Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Hi Guest! Forum rules have been updated. All users please read
here.
Home
Forums
Secret (Unbuilt) Projects
Secret Naval Projects
US Navy CONFORM submarine
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Longshaor" data-source="post: 68896" data-attributes="member: 254"><p>According to Friedman, the hull for ConForm was intended to be HY-130 with HY-100 as a fall-back if the former wasn't ready in time.</p><p></p><p>The <em>Glenard P Lipscomb</em> was a great example of the ongoing turf war between McNamara's people & Rickover. Where most military officers could not oppose McNamara because of his position as SecDef, Rickover as an AEC employee could use his Congressional contacts and support - as well as the office of the AEC - to undermine McNamara. To that end,he forced through the construction of a one-off experimental sub that would never see series production (which is why McNamara tried to kill it) as a sound test bed. The idea was that if the gear whine inherent in all other USN nuclear subs was removed, the designers would have a "clean" boat to test for other sources of radiated noise. The net result was a quiet, if very slow, boat. The DC direct-drive system, known as TEDS, was much larger than originally envisaged, and in service it proved both ineffecient and unreliable.</p><p></p><p>The interesting upshot of this battle was that <blockquote><p>The TEDS fight did make OSD more wary of attacking Admiral Rickover; as a result, TEDS deeply influenced later decision in favor of <em>Los Angeles</em>.</p></blockquote><p> -Friedman, <u>US Submarines Since 1945</u>, pg. 149.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Longshaor, post: 68896, member: 254"] According to Friedman, the hull for ConForm was intended to be HY-130 with HY-100 as a fall-back if the former wasn't ready in time. The [i]Glenard P Lipscomb[/i] was a great example of the ongoing turf war between McNamara's people & Rickover. Where most military officers could not oppose McNamara because of his position as SecDef, Rickover as an AEC employee could use his Congressional contacts and support - as well as the office of the AEC - to undermine McNamara. To that end,he forced through the construction of a one-off experimental sub that would never see series production (which is why McNamara tried to kill it) as a sound test bed. The idea was that if the gear whine inherent in all other USN nuclear subs was removed, the designers would have a "clean" boat to test for other sources of radiated noise. The net result was a quiet, if very slow, boat. The DC direct-drive system, known as TEDS, was much larger than originally envisaged, and in service it proved both ineffecient and unreliable. The interesting upshot of this battle was that [quote]The TEDS fight did make OSD more wary of attacking Admiral Rickover; as a result, TEDS deeply influenced later decision in favor of [i]Los Angeles[/i].[/quote] -Friedman, [u]US Submarines Since 1945[/u], pg. 149. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Name the company which designed the F-117A Stealth Fighter
Post reply
Home
Forums
Secret (Unbuilt) Projects
Secret Naval Projects
US Navy CONFORM submarine
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top