Lockheed Martin U-2 / TR-1 / ER-2


I watched it when it was first aired on Forces Tv, and it contained a lot of information that I never new about the U-2 before.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Maybe it’s just me but I was surprised to see the paint peeling off some of the U-2s in it. Doesn’t the paint perform some kind of small ‘stealth’ function?
 
Flyaway said:
Maybe it’s just me but I was surprised to see the paint peeling off some of the U-2s in it. Doesn’t the paint perform some kind of small ‘stealth’ function?
Click to expand...

I had known about the previous attempts to add stealth technology to the U-2 shortly after the Garry Powers shoot down by adding metal string covered in Radar Absorbent Material, but it failed, could this be a modern attempt?
 
With all the RB-57D and U-2 shot down over China, Cuba (plus of course the Gary Power aircraft) - I was wondering if the Soviets examined their cameras and sensors ? Did they got any tech advances out of them ?
 
This upgrading of the U-2 makes financial and time sense. The Powers U-2 apparently crashed like a glider. I recall a photo published by the Russians that showed it on the ground with structural breaks at the usual/expected places.
 
The usual "naked provocation." I'm sure Cuba had similar thoughts during the Cuban Missile Crisis. Meanwhile, the US has to make sure that our current new Cold War enemy number one gets a good look from to time.
 
China complains on the U-2 overflight to not look embarrassed by USN carrier tempering their macho attitude toward Taiwan (3 differents military exercice on the same time) trawling around.
European nations that have lost WWII that day in Munich should be there also. Forefront.
 
FighterJock said:
Any ideas as to how the Air Force updated the software during the flight? Sounds like it was over some form of network enabled hardware. :confused:
Click to expand...

Clearly the U-2 have a datalink. That takes care of it.

------------

The bigger implications especially nowadays is that It will allow digital countermeasure or updates to weapon software to be deployed In flight. Missiles etc, can be manufactured with just basic testing algorithm without any target tracking or countermeasure algorithm etc. ESM aircraft may analyze, develop and actually patch Jammer aircraft's jammer software with real-time developed technique.
 
stealthflanker said:
FighterJock said:
Any ideas as to how the Air Force updated the software during the flight? Sounds like it was over some form of network enabled hardware. :confused:
Click to expand...

Clearly the U-2 have a datalink. That takes care of it.

------------

The bigger implications especially nowadays is that It will allow digital countermeasure or updates to weapon software to be deployed In flight. Missiles etc, can be manufactured with just basic testing algorithm without any target tracking or countermeasure algorithm etc. ESM aircraft may analyze, develop and actually patch Jammer aircraft's jammer software with real-time developed technique.
Click to expand...

Thanks for the info stealthflanker. One further question, is the datalink system Link16 by any chance? That is the only datalink that I currently know about.
 
The Global Hawk and I suspect other unmanned systems have such a link. But China cannot know...
 
Flyaway said:
As the U-2 remains one of my favourite military aircraft I thought I would start a dedicated thread for it. As well as it being one of the more venerable models of aircraft still flying.

U-2 Avionics Upgrade Paves Way For Command And Control Role | Aviation Week Network

Far from being retired, the storied U-2 is being upgraded into the U.S. Air Force’s first fully open mission systems compliant fleet.
aviationweek.com aviationweek.com
Click to expand...

I can add some old photos I took/had taken many moons ago...
 

Attachments

  • Jan16_54.jpg
    Jan16_54.jpg
    71.7 KB · Views: 108
  • Jan16_66.jpg
    Jan16_66.jpg
    92.3 KB · Views: 58
  • Jan16_53.jpg
    Jan16_53.jpg
    81.2 KB · Views: 58
  • Jan16_92.jpg
    Jan16_92.jpg
    74.7 KB · Views: 61
  • u2S017.jpg
    u2S017.jpg
    14.1 KB · Views: 108
Artuµ was created by the U-2 Federal Laboratory, which in October successfully updated the plane′s software while it was flying — a first for the U.S. military. The event was made possible by deploying Kubernetes, an open-source, containerized method for automating software updates.
Artuμ is based on a gaming algorithm known as µZero, which has been used to beat human players in chess and Go, Roper explained in an op-ed on Popular Mechanics. The U-2 lab specially trained the AI co-pilot to manipulate the U-2′s sensor suite during “over half a million” computer-simulated missions, according to the Air Force.
“With no pilot override, ARTUµ made final calls on devoting the radar to missile hunting versus self-protection,” Roper wrote.
Click to expand...
www.defensenews.com

Artoo, take the wheel: U-2 spy plane flies for the first time with an AI co-pilot

The AI entity Artuμ controlled the U-2's sensors and helped find enemy missile launchers during a training flight.
www.defensenews.com www.defensenews.com
 
Could they create new U2 airframes, from exotic materials perhaps? Just a thought, nothing behind it.
 
Foo Fighter said:
Could they create new U2 airframes, from exotic materials perhaps? Just a thought, nothing behind it.
Click to expand...
Weren’t they proposing an unmanned version of the U-2 some years back. I can’t remember now if they were going to build new airframes based on the U-2 or re-engineer existing airframes into unmanned ones.
 
Just positing that it might be a very useful thing to have in an armoury. I did hear of a project to make current aircraft selectively piloted but no idea what came of it.
 
Sorry, I was talking about the U2 rather than the QF series.
 
From, Самолеты стратегической разведки (Моделист-Конструктор. Спецвыпуск 1 2006).
 

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    488.4 KB · Views: 231
  • 2.png
    2.png
    495.5 KB · Views: 206
  • 3.png
    3.png
    490.2 KB · Views: 191
  • 4.png
    4.png
    504.8 KB · Views: 189
  • 5.png
    5.png
    473.1 KB · Views: 191
  • 6.png
    6.png
    492.7 KB · Views: 187
  • 7.png
    7.png
    479.4 KB · Views: 186
  • 8.png
    8.png
    487.8 KB · Views: 185
  • 9.png
    9.png
    479 KB · Views: 195
  • 10.png
    10.png
    453.8 KB · Views: 209
From, Innovation with purpose Lockheed Martin's first 100 years
 

Attachments

  • 2.png
    2.png
    506.1 KB · Views: 157
overscan (PaulMM) said:
Thats just a normal U-2 model, I don't see it belongs in this topic.
Click to expand...
Sorry for that my dea PaulMM,

and from this report;

and this forum;

Lockheed U2 - WattFlyer RC Electric Flight Forums - Discuss radio control eflight

Electric Ducted Fan Jets - Lockheed U2 - Would really like to build one....seems like it would be ideal.... Any kits or planes or ....well anything ??? about 6ft span?
www.wattflyer.com
 

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    75.8 KB · Views: 156
  • 2.png
    2.png
    195.2 KB · Views: 156
  • 4.jpg
    4.jpg
    126.9 KB · Views: 180
  • 3.jpg
    3.jpg
    121.1 KB · Views: 210

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom