Home
SPF Top Rated
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Discussion and Speculation
Alternative History and Future Speculation
The Suez Crisis 1956
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dilandu" data-source="post: 376624" data-attributes="member: 9998"><blockquote data-quote="uk 75" data-source="post: 376620" data-attributes="member: 234"><p>In 1956 the Soviets were not so capable at sea,</p></blockquote><p></p><p>Doesn't matter, because we already were quite capable in air. We already have Tu-16KS and Tu-4K bombers, armed with KS-1 ("Kennel") anti-ship missiles, as well as Tu-16T and Tu-28T torpedo bombers, armed with RAT-52 rocket-propelled torpedoes. What exactly Royal Navy of 1956 could do with the massed attacks of modern fast bombers, carrying standoff cruise missiles? </p><p></p><p>The only deck all-weather interceptor they have was "Sea Venom", which was actually slower than Tu-16 (not a lot, but still), and was armed only with cannons. To intercept Soviet attacking bombers with anything like high probability of success, it would be forced to initiate tail chase - not exactly the best idea, when the target is as fast as you are.</p><p></p><p>And behind "Sea Venom"'s there were essentially nothing, that could actually stop attacking missile. Ok, maybe STAAG mounts could (theoretically) shot it down, if they get lucky. But I wouldn't exactly bet much on it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dilandu, post: 376624, member: 9998"] [QUOTE="uk 75, post: 376620, member: 234"] In 1956 the Soviets were not so capable at sea, [/QUOTE] Doesn't matter, because we already were quite capable in air. We already have Tu-16KS and Tu-4K bombers, armed with KS-1 ("Kennel") anti-ship missiles, as well as Tu-16T and Tu-28T torpedo bombers, armed with RAT-52 rocket-propelled torpedoes. What exactly Royal Navy of 1956 could do with the massed attacks of modern fast bombers, carrying standoff cruise missiles? The only deck all-weather interceptor they have was "Sea Venom", which was actually slower than Tu-16 (not a lot, but still), and was armed only with cannons. To intercept Soviet attacking bombers with anything like high probability of success, it would be forced to initiate tail chase - not exactly the best idea, when the target is as fast as you are. And behind "Sea Venom"'s there were essentially nothing, that could actually stop attacking missile. Ok, maybe STAAG mounts could (theoretically) shot it down, if they get lucky. But I wouldn't exactly bet much on it. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Discussion and Speculation
Alternative History and Future Speculation
The Suez Crisis 1956
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top