Standard Missile Discussion

Northrop Grumman Corporation was awarded a $94.3 million contract by the U.S. Navy to develop and qualify a new 21-inch diameter second-stage solid rocket motor (SSRM) for the Navy’s extended-range missile programs to deter and defeat fast-moving air, surface and hypersonic threats.
https://www.navalnews.com/naval-new...-for-second-stage-solid-rocket-motor-program/
Sounds like this could be going on the SM-3/6 and GPI.
 
Northrop Grumman Corporation was awarded a $94.3 million contract by the U.S. Navy to develop and qualify a new 21-inch diameter second-stage solid rocket motor (SSRM) for the Navy’s extended-range missile programs to deter and defeat fast-moving air, surface and hypersonic threats.
https://www.navalnews.com/naval-new...-for-second-stage-solid-rocket-motor-program/
Sounds like this could be going on the SM-3/6 and GPI.
Thought there was talk of the 21" SM-6 getting cancelled?
 

Raytheon partners with US Department of War to expand critical munition production​

https://www.navalnews.com/naval-new...f-war-to-expand-critical-munition-production/
Raytheon entered into five landmark framework agreements with the U.S. Department of War to significantly increase production capacity and speed deliveries of Land Attack and Maritime Strike variants of Tomahawk, AMRAAM missiles, Standard Missile-3 Block IB interceptors (SM-3 IB), Standard Missile-3 Block IIA interceptors (SM-3 IIA), and Standard Missile-6 (SM-6).

Applicable to multiple threads but leaving here: 1770304213261.png
A
 
Last edited:
Good catch. Is that the 21” SRM Northrop/Orbital were working on?
 
NMM sounds more like a shakeup of a vendor monopoly more than anything. It doesn't seem to threaten Standard SM-2 dominance in the short term.

Zumwalt's PVLS needs further development for frigates and destroyers. The current form has room for 7.9 meter weapons, which is a substantial space. PVLS is a great evolution and should have a variant for shorter missiles. Maybe RTX should do sort of an SM-3L (L = Lite) to cut down reliance on SM-2 variations and counter NMM. SM-3L would be specifically designed around a shorter PVLS system for smaller vessels. The shorter PVLS could house a single SM-3L, two SM-2, or a quad pack of ESSM. But of course RTX would lobby for only SM-3L to simplify logistics for the Navy.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom