Forest Green
ACCESS: USAP
- Joined
- 11 June 2019
- Messages
- 14,596
- Reaction score
- 31,707
YFQ sounds more like "Why fuq" type of joke.'FQ' - near enough to 'FU' heh heh heh. I really must grow up.
I think the USAF is going to spread the wealth across a number of different primes due to the different mission types, maybe kind of like an LCS program for aircraft where the USN bought two different types of LCS but for the basic littoral mission, for the aircraft, just the inverse multiple platforms, multiple mission types. NG may have already been selected for something due to their work with the Scaled aircraft prototypes, this may be the reason for the quick YFQ-48 desigation, we still need YFQ-45, 46, and 47.
YFQ sounds more like "Why fuq" type of joke.
So, the YFQ-48A is roughly the same size as Model 437 & 401, but with a significantly smaller wingspan?
https://www.newsweek.com/exclusive-...ext-generation-jets-northrop-grumman-11153504
Jones said the new and improved Project Talon cut the weight of the drone by about half a ton and reduced the number of parts required in half, compared with the first version.
I am a little unclear concerning YFQ-48’s status. Is it officially in the running for CCA Incr1 or is it merely a candidate for Incr2? Some of the news articles seem to talk like it was a competitor to YFQ-42/44, but as far as I know NG is out of the Incr1 competition.
Anduril and GA won the development contract for Inc 1. The production contract will be recompeted amongst the wider set of suppliers. Which I think is where NG Talon comes in.I am a little unclear concerning YFQ-48’s status. Is it officially in the running for CCA Incr1 or is it merely a candidate for Incr2?
Does the YFQ-48A have an internal weapons bay? I cannot tell from the pictures.
That looks like a door in the belly.Does the YFQ-48A have an internal weapons bay? I cannot tell from the pictures.
If Increment II's requirements are similar enough to Increment 1 for Increment 1 candidates to be strong contenders then Northrop Grumman would have to be so much better than the two already funded teams that the USAF would be willing to stand up a third type with all the production work that it entails.. Its more likely that the design contracts awarded for Increment 2 suggest requirements quite a bit different from increment 1 so Northrop would at best have to modify its current offering and at worst start with something a lot different.More than likely will be a strong contender for CCA Increment II which offers more candidate offerings.
This was one option. They also said theyd be willing to consider more exquisite systems, though the language has admittedly been vague and wishy washy.I don't see the YFQ-48A being a strong contender for Increment II. Increment II has been described as seeking a higher production rate and scale at equal or lower price points.