Geosfera Militar
ACCESS: Restricted
- Joined
- 21 July 2026
- Messages
- 1
- Reaction score
- 0
Hello everyone. I have been analyzing the financial and technological dilemma facing middle powers regarding the soaring costs of 6th-generation programs (such as NGAD or FCAS).
Evaluating current capabilities—taking KAI’s execution speed in South Korea and Saab's mastery of software architecture and dispersal doctrine in Sweden—an interesting conceptual scenario emerges: a lambda wing design without vertical stabilizers, optimized for broadband stealth and distributed sensors in a 'smart skin'.
I have broken down the aerodynamic viability, flight control challenges with relaxed static stability, and geopolitical hurdles with Washington in a full technical analysis.
I would like to know your technical opinion: Is this a real alternative for industrial survival for nations outside the superpowers, or a logistical dead end?
Full technical analysis and conceptual blueprints here:
View: https://youtu.be/7_Ag_1Gaz_s?si=4Awt0qPatuXl_mP7
Evaluating current capabilities—taking KAI’s execution speed in South Korea and Saab's mastery of software architecture and dispersal doctrine in Sweden—an interesting conceptual scenario emerges: a lambda wing design without vertical stabilizers, optimized for broadband stealth and distributed sensors in a 'smart skin'.
I have broken down the aerodynamic viability, flight control challenges with relaxed static stability, and geopolitical hurdles with Washington in a full technical analysis.
I would like to know your technical opinion: Is this a real alternative for industrial survival for nations outside the superpowers, or a logistical dead end?
Full technical analysis and conceptual blueprints here: