Home
SPF Top Rated
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Research Topics
Propulsion
Gas Turbine Development Question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="riggerrob" data-source="post: 371269" data-attributes="member: 8794"><p>"<blockquote data-quote="CaseyKnight" data-source="post: 302647" data-attributes="member: 7844"><p>I'm replying on behalf of someone else</p><p></p><p><strong>charleybarley</strong></p><p></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Steam-turbines often ran with their turbines in a stalled condition: This had to do with the pitch of the turbine blades and the geometry of the blades, which meant they'd extract the energy to spin a turbine, but leave no surplus left over to continue to push the plane. If I recall, Alan Griffith realized this back in the late 1920's <em>(I'm not sure if this was known in the United States)</em>.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><br /> </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Proponents of gas-turbines were concerned about the excessive weight of the engine: Indicating that they did seem to understand that thrust could be produced, just that it would be too heavy <em>(it would appear that there were a multitude of reasons excessive weight were expected, of which I may not know all of them, but one might have been that steam-turbines were big and heavy)</em>.</li> </ul></blockquote><p>"</p><p></p><p>First generation gas turbines were developed from lessons already learned from steam turbines.</p><p>First generation steam turbines were Pelton wheels that deliberately run with stalled buckets or blades because their goal was to extract all the energy to turn a propeller. They were designed more like water wheels than windmills.</p><p></p><p>In 1894 Mr. Parson's ship "Turbinia" was faster than any other ship afloat, but only 20 percent as efficient at converting fuel to energy. "Turbinia" also suffered problems with propeller cavitation in sea water. "Cavitation" is another way to describe "stall."</p><p>Eventually "Turbinia" got three, direct-drive steam turbines turning three propellers each, for a total of 9 propellers!</p><p></p><p>Steam turbine fuel efficiency rapidly improved until (1906) HMS Dreadnaught was the first battleship with steam turbines. All subsequent British battleships had steam turbines.</p><p></p><p>Similarly, when (1906) Birger and Fredrick Ljunstrom invented centrifugal flow steam turbines to generate electricity, they tried to extract all the energy to drive the shaft and did not care about exhaust velocity. Ljungstrom turbines are based on a pair of counter-rotating discs studded with axial blades. These axial blades are parallel to the drive shaft and extract energy from radial (outwards) steam flow. Ljungstrom. turbines were primarily used to generate electricity in Sweden and Switzerland (Brown Boverie) and powered a few ships, but were not as efficient as axial flow steam turbines.</p><p>Now the Segata Sherpa helicopter company is developing a Ljungstrom </p><p> Turbine to power their counter-rotating rotor blades.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="riggerrob, post: 371269, member: 8794"] "[QUOTE="CaseyKnight, post: 302647, member: 7844"] I'm replying on behalf of someone else [B]charleybarley[/B] [LIST] [*]Steam-turbines often ran with their turbines in a stalled condition: This had to do with the pitch of the turbine blades and the geometry of the blades, which meant they'd extract the energy to spin a turbine, but leave no surplus left over to continue to push the plane. If I recall, Alan Griffith realized this back in the late 1920's [I](I'm not sure if this was known in the United States)[/I]. [*] [*]Proponents of gas-turbines were concerned about the excessive weight of the engine: Indicating that they did seem to understand that thrust could be produced, just that it would be too heavy [I](it would appear that there were a multitude of reasons excessive weight were expected, of which I may not know all of them, but one might have been that steam-turbines were big and heavy)[/I]. [/LIST] [/QUOTE]" First generation gas turbines were developed from lessons already learned from steam turbines. First generation steam turbines were Pelton wheels that deliberately run with stalled buckets or blades because their goal was to extract all the energy to turn a propeller. They were designed more like water wheels than windmills. In 1894 Mr. Parson's ship "Turbinia" was faster than any other ship afloat, but only 20 percent as efficient at converting fuel to energy. "Turbinia" also suffered problems with propeller cavitation in sea water. "Cavitation" is another way to describe "stall." Eventually "Turbinia" got three, direct-drive steam turbines turning three propellers each, for a total of 9 propellers! Steam turbine fuel efficiency rapidly improved until (1906) HMS Dreadnaught was the first battleship with steam turbines. All subsequent British battleships had steam turbines. Similarly, when (1906) Birger and Fredrick Ljunstrom invented centrifugal flow steam turbines to generate electricity, they tried to extract all the energy to drive the shaft and did not care about exhaust velocity. Ljungstrom turbines are based on a pair of counter-rotating discs studded with axial blades. These axial blades are parallel to the drive shaft and extract energy from radial (outwards) steam flow. Ljungstrom. turbines were primarily used to generate electricity in Sweden and Switzerland (Brown Boverie) and powered a few ships, but were not as efficient as axial flow steam turbines. Now the Segata Sherpa helicopter company is developing a Ljungstrom Turbine to power their counter-rotating rotor blades. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Research Topics
Propulsion
Gas Turbine Development Question
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top