Aviation Week article on HEX includes an image with a 4-rotor tilt-wing and a conventional helicopter (looking very S-76-ish) with the hybrid drivetrain
https://aviationweek.com/aerospace/emerging-technologies/sikorsky-reveals-hex-tiltwing-demonstrator-configuration
Bell at least can point to V-22 as an example of a folding tilt-rotor which can fit into a fairly compact space, and possibly they've learned enough to make the packaging work a little better in a new generation design. Sikorsky-LM can't really cite any similar precedent, they either have to...
Bell has a far better fall back position in the civil sector than any of the other rotorcraft vendors. Surprisingly Boeing has the most risk as they have no civil rotor craft programs to speak of. Not surprising of Mr. Sikorsky to wave off on tilt rotor not because of militarily but in civil...
What if?????
Those paintings got me to wondering how it would fly if you installed the tail rotor in a hole (fenestron) cut in one half of the V tail?
Think of the tilted tail rotor on Sikorsky CH-53 ... which helps adjust pitch trim. Pitch trim is important on cargo helicopters that frequently...
Boeing Teams with Sikorsky on JMR program
http://www.shephardmedia.com/news/rotorhub/sikorsky-boeing-team-us-armys-jmr-td/
Nice way to hedge your bet. As Boeing is also teamed with Bell on Tilt-Rotor there is a good chance now that Boeing will be involved in the Joint Multi-Roll effort...
Actually there are five JHL concepts in three speed bands.
The Sikorsky X2 Lifter and Boeing ATRH (Advanced Tandem Rotor Helicopter) at <170 knots
The Sikorsky X2 High Speed Lifter in the 170-240 knot band
The Bell/Boeing QTR (Quad Tilt Rotor) and Karem Industries OSTR (Optimum Speed Tilt...
airborne forces
airlifter
airmobile
future combat systems
joint heavy lift (united states)
late 2000s
nasa
tiltrotor
transport aircraft
united states
united states army
united states marine corps
united states navy
v/stol aircraft
vtol
war on terror
Sikorsky will promote the CH-53K as the heavy solution. Boeing will advocate a larger CH-47 (already some NATO work done in this regard). Bell may or may not even consider participation, however if they did, I would expect them to advocate a Tilt Rotor.
@Scott Kenny - size growth might reduce the number of ships that would be accessible. It would also have to auto-fold per USN shipboard requirement. If "the juice is worth the squeeze" for the expense I would agree larger more productivity to the fleet would be warranted.
I think that the...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.