zebra159357
I really should change my personal text
- Joined
- 30 November 2018
- Messages
- 157
- Reaction score
- 542
Just the congress..What other rounds of approval do they need?
Just the congress..What other rounds of approval do they need?
Finland’s first F-35 jets have arrived in the country
Key Points
- Finland's first two F-35A fighter jets landed at the Lapland Air Wing in Rovaniemi on Sept. 18, 2026, after a ferry flight from Texas.
- Finland plans to field all 64 jets by the end of 2030, reaching initial operational capability in early 2028.
FMS needs Department of State approval before sending the proposal to Congress.What other rounds of approval do they need?
Well 48 are all that are approved (and presumably asked for) at this stageI wonder how many they will get eventually.
U.S. Department of State approval has been givenFMS needs Department of State approval before sending the proposal to Congress.
Correct, but I was attempting to explain that FMS is a two-step process.U.S. Department of State approval has been given
Surprised nobody's posted this yet... There's a fair bit of exposed rivets here (for those who like to claim the F-35 has no exposed rivets), and I don't think we've ever had this good a look at some of these finer details before:Luftwaffe F-35 roll out
Source: Lockheed Martin FB page
View attachment 824099View attachment 824100View attachment 824101
Look more like removable fasteners than rivets to meSurprised nobody's posted this yet... There's a fair bit of exposed rivets here (for those who like to claim the F-35 has no exposed rivets), and I don't think we've ever had this good a look at some of these finer details before:
Yeah, I momentarily forgot what it's called -- English isn't my native language as you might have guessedLook more like removable fasteners than rivets to me
Not what they're doing with the F-22 LO-pylons.
Assuming they are working on a similiar solution for the F-35 is not unreasonable.
I always thought it was the obvious Tornado replacementI never figured the F-35 was going to see Luftwaffe service, it didn't seem like it would fill any particular role for them
Not seeing the problem.That just had to happen Erdosain, the Saudi's getting State Department approval for the F-35A, I wonder how many they will get eventually.
Same concern as with Turkey having Russian radar specialists lookin at detection data on the S-400 tracking Turkeys own F-35.Not seeing the problem.
Same concern as with Turkey having Russian radar specialists lookin at detection data on the S-400 tracking Turkeys own F-35.
The Chinese and Saudi have deepening ties when it comes to military and military adjacent techs, the field of radar included
They could also buy ASRAAMS from the UK.In theory the IRIS-T missile shouldn't be that hard to integrate on the outer wing pylons, but considering how software development for the F-35 still manages to be a complete mess somehow, I'm guessing they're just buying AIM-9Xs.
Why would we do that when we went through all the hassle of booting Turkey out?Same concern as with Turkey having Russian radar specialists lookin at detection data on the S-400 tracking Turkeys own F-35.
The Chinese and Saudi have deepening ties when it comes to military and military adjacent techs, the field of radar included
Or just not fly the F-35A with short range missiles at all. It's a strike fighter and replaces a fighter-bomber first and foremost. It'll carry A2G ordnance most of the time and for everything else AIM-120 is good enough, which is already in stock due to the Eurofighter.They could also buy ASRAAMS from the UK.
Hill investigates after F-35 parts diverted to Hong Kong
Sensitive F-35 fighter jet technology was unexpectedly diverted to Hong Kong this summer, sparking an inquiry on Capitol Hill and raising the possibility that China could have access to key components of the highly classified weapon system.
A shipment of F-35 parts bound for the United States for repairs was rerouted as it transited the Pacific Ocean from Australia, according to three people familiar with the matter who were granted anonymity to discuss private conversations. The Pentagon confirmed the disappearance of some components.
The parts, which an intermediary was transporting on behalf of F-35 manufacturer Lockheed Martin, instead wound up in Hong Kong. It’s not clear why the equipment was rerouted or who has possession of it now.
Speaking of the risk of F-35 secrets being exposed due to partnerships: https://www.politico.com/news/2026/09/18/congress-f-35-china-investigation-01083647
Two arrived. But there were three on the way. One was left behind on the way. Perhaps in Portugal?
Exactly what are you trying to say here??Speaking of the risk of F-35 secrets being exposed due to partnerships
Germany has already ordered, or will order, the following weapons for their F-35 fleet...Or just not fly the F-35A with short range missiles at all. It's a strike fighter and replaces a fighter-bomber first and foremost. It'll carry A2G ordnance most of the time and for everything else AIM-120 is good enough, which is already in stock due to the Eurofighter.
It mostly just seemed pertinent to all the noise about who can or should be allowed in the program.Exactly what are you trying to say here??
Cannot make a pylon real stealthy, they are attached externally and are going to have at least a minimal return, same goes for the new F-22 "shaped" composite external tanks, maybe gives you a little more advantage but I could be wrong as well, just going by my just enough to be dangerous experience.They are not. As has been discussed many times there are aerodynamic issues with external tanks on the F-35, and no one wants to pay to solve these issues.
They are not. As has been discussed many times there are aerodynamic issues with external tanks on the F-35, and no one wants to pay to solve these issues.
Aussie defense chief confirms missing F-35 parts, says none are ‘sensitive’
After parts reportedly made their way to Hong Kong, a Lockheed Martin spokesperson told Breaking Defense that the missing components “are unserviceable and deemed low risk for exploitation."
Current admin has quite a family business tie to the Saudis in the billions of dollars. Turkey - millions at best.Why would we do that when we went through all the hassle of booting Turkey out?
Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.Current admin has quite a family business tie to the Saudis in the billions of dollars. Turkey - millions at best.
Notably, Kushner launched Affinity Partners. Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund (PIF), chaired by Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS), committed $2 billion to the start-up despite domestic criticism that Kushner had little experience in financial management.
Trump family also has mutiple active real estate projects with the Saudis in which Trump personally hold 80% of the equity.
It's also important to note that the ban on Turkey was enacted by Congress not Trump. Trump has openly called for the ban to be lifted. Maybe Congress will step in to enact a ban on Saudis but Saudis influence on our Congress isn't on the same level as Turkey no offense to our Turkish friends.
Corruptions aside, I'm conflicted on these bans. as @bring_it_on said, we at a point where we either lose these markets completely or live with the fact that we can't control how these countries buy their weapons.