I'm honestly expecting something like a "Century Series" of CCAs, relatively rapidly getting more and more capable like the F100-F111 series did.
And yes, probably some adjustments on the "disposable-attritable-non-attritable" axis. (Disposable is 1 mission, essentially a missile. Attritable is more than 1 mission, maybe 10-15 for expected life. Non-attritable is planning on a longer life yet, but I'm not sure how long an aircraft would really last over Taiwan or Crimea.)
Holy crap, 3000nmi ranges for the non-attritable CCAs?!?
Crud, I was more impressed by the ranges.
IMO, at the high end they were considering UAVs of much larger size than most of what we’ve seen. A half dozen AAMs and ranges in the thousands is a large aircraft, even if purely subsonic. I don’t see how you are not heavily runway dependent.
I think there will be several manufacturers of CCAs, if not all five companies already involved. Using different models not only allows for quick iterations, it also allows avrapid build up of capacity.
ETA: I will say that the CCA 5 is my idea of a core capability. A pair of missiles for a single target and short range passive sensors for such, with runway independence. Only every third or forth aircraft needs to successfully kill an opponent fighter to break even.
The CCA 1/2 seem like pipe dreams - runway independent, supersonic, very long range, and with heavy war loads?
Last edited: