Suggested projects for the future

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hi,

the Mr. C. Langley very large aircraft and Mr. Howard Hughes and
Mr. Henry J. Kaiser seven engine twin boom flying boat of 1942.
http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1942/1942%20-%202480.html
 

Attachments

  • Langley.JPG
    Langley.JPG
    65.7 KB · Views: 73
  • HK.JPG
    HK.JPG
    65.4 KB · Views: 89
Thanks Hesham for the Kaiser Hughes HK new picture. I knew several of them but not this one.
Image18.gif

sources: "Howard Hughes and his Hercules", Aeroplane Spotter IV
 
Thank you my dear Tophe very much,

and Also from Flightglobal,a composite flying boat.
http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1942/1942%20-%202259.html
 

Attachments

  • Composite flying boat.JPG
    Composite flying boat.JPG
    36 KB · Views: 87
Hi,

a twin engined composite bomber.
http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1942/1942%20-%202317.html
 

Attachments

  • bomber.JPG
    bomber.JPG
    65.3 KB · Views: 89
Hesham,

These are not projects but 'recognition exercises' for the readers of Flight.
The drawings are a made up of parts taken from several existing aircraft..
 
As far as I am concerned, I love drawings, no matter if they are industrial projects or journalists' dreams. Do you mean, Lark, that they should be posted in another part of this site? (please don't tell Hesham: post them no more)... Here or there, they are wonderful.
 
Dear Tophe,
I was not judging the searchwork of Hesham.The remark was made because the two illustrations
from Flight are not aircraft projects.
It should be a good idea to place them in a separate chapter with commercial/advertisement
illustrations and the like.
(just as was done with the patent drawings)
 
OK my dears Lark and Tophe,

and thank you,from Flightglobal also,a fighter-dive bomber with the
pilot in the prone position.
http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1942/1942%20-%200349.html
 

Attachments

  • Fighter-dive bomber.JPG
    Fighter-dive bomber.JPG
    41.7 KB · Views: 276
Hi,

here is the Argosy development.
http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1929/1929%20-%200419.html
 

Attachments

  • Argosy.JPG
    Argosy.JPG
    26.6 KB · Views: 303
(Hope this works as I'm a newbie here)
The 'New Medium Glider' concept from GAL as a replacement for the Horsa.
I can't help thinking that shared some ideas with the Universal Freighter/Beverley
 

Attachments

  • New Medium Glider 2.jpg
    New Medium Glider 2.jpg
    34.1 KB · Views: 252
aeronut said:
The 'New Medium Glider' concept from GAL as a replacement for the Horsa.
I can't help thinking that shared some ideas with the Universal Freighter/Beverley

Nice find.

You may be right about this 'New Medium Glider' leading to the Universal Freighter. But according to Air International (41-5, Nov 1991), the GAL.60 concept descends from the Mercury 31-powered Hamilcar Mk X conversions rather than a Horsa replacement.

The original idea behind the GAL.60 was for a tactical transport able to "delivery men and supplies right into the forward combat area". Specifically, it was to "operate into and out of short, unprepared landing strips". Obviously, GAF was planning a powered aircraft from the outset.

Perhaps the 'New Medium Glider' and GAL.60 simple share a common parentage. In the latter case, other layouts were actively considered at first. -- including twin-boomed and variations with a detachable pod (with its own tracked u/c for low air drops -- also see pilot's notes below). Only later, with the 'pod' now permanently attached, did the GAL.60 strongly resemble the 'New Medium Glider'.

BTW, the earlier version of what became the GAL.60 was to have 4 x Merlin 90s. by Hercules (as per GAL.60) and an enlarged version was to be Centaurus-powered (presaging the B-101 Beverly Mk 2).
-----------------
From Beverly pilot notes for sale on ebay.nl

"BLACKBURN BEVERLEY C.Mk.1 - PILOT'S NOTES AP 4512A-P.N.

The origins of the Beverley lie in a series of design studies carried out by General Aircraft Ltd (GAL) in 1945, looking at the problems of large cargo-transport aircraft. During World War 2, GAL had been responsible for the design of the huge Hamilcar tank-carrying glider, most of which were built by sub-contractors. The development of the all-wood Hamilcar culminated in the Mk X version fitted with two Bristol Mercury engines. Employing the operational lessons learnt from the wartime use of the Hamilcar, GALs studies projected a twin-finned, four-engined, fixed-undercarriage, pod and boom aircraft with a detachable cargo compartment. Subsequent studies evolved a substantially larger aircraft with a fixed freight compartment, but retaining the same general layout.

In 1946 the Air Ministry issued specification C.3/46 calling for a medium-range tactical transport which could safely use small airfields. GAL submitted a refined version of it's design, designated G.A.L.60 Universal Freighter, and in 1948 was awarded a contract for two prototypes. The second prototype was later cancelled. As GAL was a fairly small company, with only limited production capacity, it began looking for a partner to help it develop the design. At the same time, Blackburn Aircraft Ltd was looking for additional work to keep its Brough factory busy, and saw good future prospects in the GAL design. Consequently, on 1 January 1949 General Aircraft Ltd merged with Blackburn Aircraft Ltd, to form Blackburn and General Aircraft Ltd."
 
I found the glider's details and that picture in a Catalogue of Airborne Forces Equipment published by the Army Air Transport Development Centre in 1950.
I'm away from home at the moment but when I get back I'll dig out the information I have on the Blackburn B108 Beverley development, the Airspeed Ayrshire and the Military Herald as I have the manufacturers brochures for all three.
 
Hesham, I thought your posts about high speed seaplanes deserve their own topic so I sent it there:

http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,5008.msg39712/topicseen.html#msg39712

Antonio
 
Hi,

a Bristol strange airliner aircraft.
http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1943/1943%20-%202284.html
 

Attachments

  • Bristol.JPG
    Bristol.JPG
    52.9 KB · Views: 213
Hi,

a strange Germany autogiro.
http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1932/1932%20-%200538.html
 

Attachments

  • autogiro.JPG
    autogiro.JPG
    24.4 KB · Views: 233
Hi,

the Wilmot Frog IV interceptor of 1932.
http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1932/1932%20-%201135.html
 

Attachments

  • Frog IV 1.JPG
    Frog IV 1.JPG
    38.2 KB · Views: 89
  • Frog IV 2.JPG
    Frog IV 2.JPG
    29.1 KB · Views: 108
Hi,

Stanavo aviation fuels and oils,and a strange airliner.
http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1936/1936%20-%200319.html
 

Attachments

  • Stanavo.JPG
    Stanavo.JPG
    35.4 KB · Views: 59
hesham said:
Hi,

the Wilmot Frog IV interceptor of 1932.
http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1932/1932%20-%201135.html

Hi Hesham,
very cool, but, its an article about a model airplane. ;)

Jon
 
Yes my dear Jon,

but we can consider it as a new fighter design in that time.

Also a strange pusher aircraft,which was intended as civil
primary trainer project.
http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1932/1932%20-%201127.html
 

Attachments

  • Trainer.JPG
    Trainer.JPG
    23.6 KB · Views: 229
Hi,

a very strange Empire flying bioat project,it was designed in 1907.
http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1936/1936%20-%201580.html
 

Attachments

  • flying boat of 1907.JPG
    flying boat of 1907.JPG
    46.1 KB · Views: 266
Wilmot Frog IV interceptor of 1932.
some additional info
 

Attachments

  • Escanear0001.jpg
    Escanear0001.jpg
    142.5 KB · Views: 214
  • Escanear0002.jpg
    Escanear0002.jpg
    155.5 KB · Views: 221
  • Escanear0003.jpg
    Escanear0003.jpg
    173.3 KB · Views: 209
  • Escanear0004.jpg
    Escanear0004.jpg
    163.2 KB · Views: 82
Hesham,

This 1907 design has nothing to do with the Empire Flying boats.
The illustration is one of the several Davidson "Gyropter" or 'rotary flying wing' designs
produced between 1896 and 1912.
One of the last concepts used 3 sets of biplane wings in tandem with large rotary lifters
in between providing propulsion and lift.

Full story in : 'Davidson's Folly' -Aeroplane Monthly Agust 1973.
 
Hi,

a two hypothetical single seat fighters armed with guns.
http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1939/1939-1-%20-%201600.html
 

Attachments

  • fighters.JPG
    fighters.JPG
    40.5 KB · Views: 106
These are just drawins for comparison of a future fighter armament against
the then current fighters. There's no relation to any real project, I'm afraid :-\
 
Thank you my dear Jemiba,

and a design combined aeroplane and gyroplane,with single bladed rotor.
http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1940/1940%20-%203175.html
 

Attachments

  • FIG.1.JPG
    FIG.1.JPG
    11 KB · Views: 768
  • FIG.2.JPG
    FIG.2.JPG
    37.7 KB · Views: 47
Hi,

a pusher transport aircraft.
http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1940/1940%20-%203715.html
 

Attachments

  • fig.1.JPG
    fig.1.JPG
    19.7 KB · Views: 63
hesham said:
Hi,
a pusher transport aircraft.
http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1940/1940%20-%203715.html
and this is a sesquiplane, which was very rare in 1940. Thanks a lot. Very interesting, with good reasons: wide short solid undercarriage while there is a high wing so a short distance ground-seats... Boeing & Airbus should think about it.
 
Hi,

anther pusher fighter design.
http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1941/1941%20-%202835.html
 

Attachments

  • pusher fighter.JPG
    pusher fighter.JPG
    32.6 KB · Views: 122
Thanks for this beautiful design. The text provides also good reasons to choose this layout. Much interesting. This could have been proposed in the US pusher-fighter competition XP-54/55/56... Taylor XP-53 or XP-57 (instead of the Curtiss XP-53 or Tucker XP-57). Great!
 
Hi,

Flightglobal suggested a twin boom fighter configuration with powered by
two engine,push-pull concept.
http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1942/1942%20-%200364.html
 

Attachments

  • fighter.JPG
    fighter.JPG
    18.4 KB · Views: 86
Hesham,
I'm afraid that the twinboom is not a project but rather
a design exercise by a Flight correspondent....
 
After the famous Fokker D-XXIII prototype, many enthusiasts asked "why don't we design this way?". And many design bureaux did, in the US, Japan, Germany, USSR, Hungary, even England (Pemberton-Billing, Martin-Baker, etc.). So this (push-pull twin-boom) drawing is more a schematic family than an actual project, but many similar projects were on the drawing board...
 
Hi,

a high speed monoplane of 1921.
http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1921/1921%20-%200016.html
 

Attachments

  • monoplane.JPG
    monoplane.JPG
    32.8 KB · Views: 557
Hi,

the Flightglobal suggested an aircraft for Alula wing.
http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1920/1920%20-%200814.html
 

Attachments

  • untitled.JPG
    untitled.JPG
    37.7 KB · Views: 450
Hi,

http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1924/1924%20-%200759.html
 

Attachments

  • Flettner.JPG
    Flettner.JPG
    22.4 KB · Views: 421
Hi,

a suggesting from Flightglobal.
http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1931/1931%20-%201242.html
 

Attachments

  • Pteroautogirentedacty.JPG
    Pteroautogirentedacty.JPG
    36.3 KB · Views: 400
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom