Shorts Tigercat

Jemiba

Moderator
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
11 March 2006
Messages
8,614
Reaction score
3,107
From the French Aviation Magazine, July 1960, a picture showing a proposed
version of the Shorts Tigercat:
 

Attachments

  • Tigercat.jpg
    Tigercat.jpg
    120.4 KB · Views: 495
Here is another drawing of the Centurion-based Tigercat launcher. It seems the system might have an all-weather (at least 'dark fire' if not blind-fire) capability: note the radome of what could have been a tracking radar.

Btw do you have any idea whether there was a blind-fire version of the towed Tigercat ever envisaged or developed (afaik such a version has never seen service).

Piotr
 

Attachments

  • Tigercat_Centurion.jpg
    Tigercat_Centurion.jpg
    163.6 KB · Views: 247
Was there ever a "self-contained" Tigercat system which entered service? The Tigercat system did enter service, but its director and missiles were towed behind separate vehicles in most cases. Was there ever an attempt to tow the missiles behind a vehicle with the director already mounted on it?
 
Btw do you have any idea whether there was a blind-fire version of the towed Tigercat ever envisaged or developed (afaik such a version has never seen service).

Yes it conducted Marconi ST850 firing tests around 1974 and was marketed with it shortly afterwards. Argentina showed interest in it as an upgrade, proposing up to eight radars, but I guess the money wasn't there.

The brochure arrangement was one radar directing two batteries with a third optical battery as backup.

Edit: from Radar Systems International No29, 1980 or later, apparently the ST850 Tigercat system was delivered to at least one customer! Detection range > 20km.
 

Attachments

  • Marconi_ST850.png
    Marconi_ST850.png
    156.8 KB · Views: 27
  • Marconi_ST850_news.png
    Marconi_ST850_news.png
    643.2 KB · Views: 37
Last edited:
I know that TigerCat/SeaCat started out as anti-tank missiles, did they retain an anti-surface capability as SAMs?

An early quote from Shorts was "If you hit a surface vessel with Seacat it will leave a very large hole".

Late 70s option was capacitance-based heightfinding* that prevented the missile from descending below 20ft; prior to that the controller could smash it into anything on the surface if he/she so wished.

* Embedded in a wing, took 15 mins to install on existing missiles with a bit of re-wiring involved. Presumably not applicable to the Hellcat ASM variant.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom