It’s been pointed out elsewhere that this person has a credibility issue in that he doesn’t believe that Space X reuses their rockets.Thunderf00t second strike -
About Starship ? yes he is very sceptic man on that
It’s been pointed out elsewhere that this person has a credibility issue in that he doesn’t believe that Space X reuses their rockets.Thunderf00t second strike -
No the Falcon 9. I can’t take seriously someone who can’t even believe the self evident like the reuse of the Falcon 9.It’s been pointed out elsewhere that this person has a credibility issue in that he doesn’t believe that Space X reuses their rockets.Thunderf00t second strike -
About Starship ? yes he is very sceptic man on that
It’s been pointed out elsewhere that this person has a credibility issue in that he doesn’t believe that Space X reuses their rockets.Thunderf00t second strike -
While retired officials involved with the effort — including Harry Reid, the former Senate majority leader — hope the program will seek evidence of vehicles from other worlds, its main focus is on discovering whether another nation, especially any potential adversary, is using breakout aviation technology that could threaten the United States.
Well did they ever discover who this so called unknown domestic entity was then, after all it has been over seventy years later?The New York Times writer appears to have studied no history. A 'memo' written in 1947 by the commander of Air Materiel Command at Wright Field in Dayton Ohio clearly states that it was possible at that time to build a similar aircraft as the 'flying discs.' It included the idea that that these aircraft were produced by some domestic entity unknown to them or the USAAF. Asking the same questions for decades has yielded no other answers. Assuming that some UFOs crashed does not identify them since that information is not available aside from a select few.
Even the title is misleading. It should read: "Want hard evidence for UFOs? You won't find it here."
them :Well did they ever discover who this so called unknown domestic entity was then, after all it has been over seventy years later?The New York Times writer appears to have studied no history. A 'memo' written in 1947 by the commander of Air Materiel Command at Wright Field in Dayton Ohio clearly states that it was possible at that time to build a similar aircraft as the 'flying discs.' It included the idea that that these aircraft were produced by some domestic entity unknown to them or the USAAF. Asking the same questions for decades has yielded no other answers. Assuming that some UFOs crashed does not identify them since that information is not available aside from a select few.
Even the title is misleading. It should read: "Want hard evidence for UFOs? You won't find it here."
Well did they ever discover who this so called unknown domestic entity was then, after all it has been over seventy years later?The New York Times writer appears to have studied no history. A 'memo' written in 1947 by the commander of Air Materiel Command at Wright Field in Dayton Ohio clearly states that it was possible at that time to build a similar aircraft as the 'flying discs.' It included the idea that that these aircraft were produced by some domestic entity unknown to them or the USAAF. Asking the same questions for decades has yielded no other answers. Assuming that some UFOs crashed does not identify them since that information is not available aside from a select few.
Even the title is misleading. It should read: "Want hard evidence for UFOs? You won't find it here."
them :Well did they ever discover who this so called unknown domestic entity was then, after all it has been over seventy years later?The New York Times writer appears to have studied no history. A 'memo' written in 1947 by the commander of Air Materiel Command at Wright Field in Dayton Ohio clearly states that it was possible at that time to build a similar aircraft as the 'flying discs.' It included the idea that that these aircraft were produced by some domestic entity unknown to them or the USAAF. Asking the same questions for decades has yielded no other answers. Assuming that some UFOs crashed does not identify them since that information is not available aside from a select few.
Even the title is misleading. It should read: "Want hard evidence for UFOs? You won't find it here."
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iT-erlyuCpY
Burp... sorry.
So what, exactly, was Trump getting at in this interview? One interpretation is that Trump riffed on the possible threat of aliens to talk about how much he had done for the U.S. military. Indeed, the president has spent approximately $2.5 trillion on defense, though there’s been no real increase in America’s overall military strength and number of weapons.
The other possibility? This was Trump directly threatening aliens—or, more likely, the foreign governments behind the UAPs that the Pentagon is investigating—with military action.
You don't need to threaten a threat that doesn't exist.The president appears to be threatening aliens with the US military. Well not quite.
So what, exactly, was Trump getting at in this interview? One interpretation is that Trump riffed on the possible threat of aliens to talk about how much he had done for the U.S. military. Indeed, the president has spent approximately $2.5 trillion on defense, though there’s been no real increase in America’s overall military strength and number of weapons.
The other possibility? This was Trump directly threatening aliens—or, more likely, the foreign governments behind the UAPs that the Pentagon is investigating—with military action.
Trump Acknowledges UFOs, Threatens Aliens With Military Action
There's so much we need to unpack here.www.popularmechanics.com
Nope, too much angles.And another of these photos again from an F/A-18. In spite of what it says in the article it still looks like semi-deflated balloon to me.
Leaked DoD Photo of Purported Unidentified Aerial Phenomena
Taken from the cockpit of an F/A-18 fighter jet, the photo is claimed to show unidentified aerial phenomena hovering over the ocean.thedebrief.org
According to Greenewald, around 10,000 Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) reports were required to obtain the PDFs and the process was an excruciatingly long one. He scanned the documents by hand.
“Around 20 years ago, I had fought for years to get additional UFO records released from the CIA,” Greenewald said in an email to Motherboard. “It was like pulling teeth! I went around and around with them to try and do so, finally achieving it. I received a large box, of a couple thousand pages, and I had to scan them in one page at a time.”
According to a blog announcing the archive, the CIA created a CD-ROM containing previously released records as well as those the Black Vault was attempting to unseal. To ensure the Black Vault has as complete a record of CIA documents as possible available, it purchased this CD-ROM in mid-2020.
The Black Vault blog notes that the CIA claims that this represents all its documents on the file, but there may be no way to verify that and other documents may be out there.
“Researchers and curious minds alike prefer simplicity and accessibility when they look at data dumps such as these,” Greenewald said. “The CIA has made it INCREDIBLY difficult to use their records in a reasonable manner. They offer a format that is very outdated (multi page .tif) and offer text file outputs, largely unusable, that I think they intend to have people use as a “search” tool. In my opinion, this outdated format makes it very difficult for people to see the documents, and use them, for any research purpose.”
It takes money to keep updating formats over the years.What interested me about this wasn’t the UFO nonsense but this section of the article.
According to Greenewald, around 10,000 Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) reports were required to obtain the PDFs and the process was an excruciatingly long one. He scanned the documents by hand.
“Around 20 years ago, I had fought for years to get additional UFO records released from the CIA,” Greenewald said in an email to Motherboard. “It was like pulling teeth! I went around and around with them to try and do so, finally achieving it. I received a large box, of a couple thousand pages, and I had to scan them in one page at a time.”
According to a blog announcing the archive, the CIA created a CD-ROM containing previously released records as well as those the Black Vault was attempting to unseal. To ensure the Black Vault has as complete a record of CIA documents as possible available, it purchased this CD-ROM in mid-2020.
The Black Vault blog notes that the CIA claims that this represents all its documents on the file, but there may be no way to verify that and other documents may be out there.
“Researchers and curious minds alike prefer simplicity and accessibility when they look at data dumps such as these,” Greenewald said. “The CIA has made it INCREDIBLY difficult to use their records in a reasonable manner. They offer a format that is very outdated (multi page .tif) and offer text file outputs, largely unusable, that I think they intend to have people use as a “search” tool. In my opinion, this outdated format makes it very difficult for people to see the documents, and use them, for any research purpose.”
You Can Now Easily Download All CIA UFO Documents to Date
The Black Vault has released hundreds of public PDFs containing CIA information on UFOswww.vice.com
jeeezz i didnt think they were in an information crisis or somethingIt takes money to keep updating formats over the years.What interested me about this wasn’t the UFO nonsense but this section of the article.
According to Greenewald, around 10,000 Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) reports were required to obtain the PDFs and the process was an excruciatingly long one. He scanned the documents by hand.
“Around 20 years ago, I had fought for years to get additional UFO records released from the CIA,” Greenewald said in an email to Motherboard. “It was like pulling teeth! I went around and around with them to try and do so, finally achieving it. I received a large box, of a couple thousand pages, and I had to scan them in one page at a time.”
According to a blog announcing the archive, the CIA created a CD-ROM containing previously released records as well as those the Black Vault was attempting to unseal. To ensure the Black Vault has as complete a record of CIA documents as possible available, it purchased this CD-ROM in mid-2020.
The Black Vault blog notes that the CIA claims that this represents all its documents on the file, but there may be no way to verify that and other documents may be out there.
“Researchers and curious minds alike prefer simplicity and accessibility when they look at data dumps such as these,” Greenewald said. “The CIA has made it INCREDIBLY difficult to use their records in a reasonable manner. They offer a format that is very outdated (multi page .tif) and offer text file outputs, largely unusable, that I think they intend to have people use as a “search” tool. In my opinion, this outdated format makes it very difficult for people to see the documents, and use them, for any research purpose.”
You Can Now Easily Download All CIA UFO Documents to Date
The Black Vault has released hundreds of public PDFs containing CIA information on UFOswww.vice.com
And they did not blast them with the Vulcan because?Multiple Destroyers Were Swarmed By Mysterious 'Drones' Off California Over Numerous Nights
The disturbing series of events during the summer of 2019 resulted in an investigation that made its way to the highest echelons of the Navy.www.thedrive.com
Don't agree. Try flying a Cessna unannounced at night on top of some USN destroyers and tell me you wont be killed. It is not a coincidence this happened in the same area as the "Tic Tacs". Some of the crew talked last year and this ended up on twitter. The leakers said they looked like Tic Tacs. But the Navy called them "UAV" because the Navy didnt want the UFO crowd to go nuts again.What about one of those flat vessels often referenced as narco-submarines using normally used to offload cargo drones to harass and distract navy vessels the time she exited safely their detection range?
If such drones does exit, they are probably powerful and have range (hence loiter time) plus deniability means (small explosive, water way to sink rapidly...). That would explain the guidance enigma (you'd offload a buoy with antennas attached to your vessels through a fiber optic cable - Narco-submarines would use that to decorelate their geo position to any ESM localisation meanings).
Please understand that here it doesn't change anything if the fleeting vessel is involved in the narco traffic or something else, is a sumi-submerged ship or a full submarine. The modus of operation is simply easier to understand with that example