Stargazer

ACCESS: USAP
Top Contributor
Joined
25 June 2009
Messages
14,102
Reaction score
4,194
hesham said:
in the Les Ailes journal,Mr. Gaffey,ho created a twin boom light aircraft with Ford V-8
http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k6553899m/f5.image

I was so sure I'd shared a photo of what was then a mysterious aircraft, but couldn't trace the topic despite my efforts. Our friend Tophe probably could have identified right away, since he mentions it in his Forked Ghosts and Catamarans du Ciel works, but he no longer visits this forum... Anyway, after three years of fruitless search, I happened one day on the page of a modeler who had built a nice 1:72 scale version of the elusive prototype!

Mr. Neil McGaffey from Inglewood, California, wanted to build a plane from out-of-the-shelf components: you would go to the auto parts store and get a couple of wheels, a dashboard, brakes, instruments, a seat, a big radiator, etc.
And so was born the McGaffey AV-8 Aviate (nothing new here, Mr. Harrier!). The engine was a Ford V-8. Landing lights were faired into the wheel pants. The hydraulic shock struts on the landing gear were McGaffey's own design. Wingspan was 34 ft. and wing area was 195.3 sq. ft.

I have never seen a photo of it in flight that could prove it was ever airborne, and though it probably was, it never received a Type Certificate or even a so-called Group 2 Memo approval.


Source for info/model:
www.aircraftresourcecenter.com/Gal9/8001-8100/gal8036-Aviate-Stern/00.shtm
 

Attachments

  • Strangely familiar 1.jpg
    Strangely familiar 1.jpg
    252.7 KB · Views: 297
  • 01.jpg
    01.jpg
    107.3 KB · Views: 59
  • 14.jpg
    14.jpg
    30.9 KB · Views: 51
  • 13.jpg
    13.jpg
    28.9 KB · Views: 56
  • 12.jpg
    12.jpg
    28.7 KB · Views: 204
  • 10.jpg
    10.jpg
    29 KB · Views: 220
  • 02.jpg
    02.jpg
    102.2 KB · Views: 228
  • Gaffey.JPG
    Gaffey.JPG
    42.7 KB · Views: 255
That's it Stargazer,


I also saw it before,and from Aerofiles site;
 

Attachments

  • mcgaffey.jpg
    mcgaffey.jpg
    16.5 KB · Views: 80
An interesting article by Walter Boyne from Airline Pilot in 1987 sheds more light on the subject:

The McGaffey Aviate—was an effort to meet the American public's hope that flying an airplane could be as easy and inexpensive as driving a car.

Not only did the aviation public wish to have an airplane as easy to buy as an automobile (the rock bottom price on a Model T was only $295), the manufacturers of private aircraft were equally eager to have their products perceived as airborne automobiles, with equal utility and even greater social cachet. Piper, Taylorcraft, Aeronca, and others dolled their airplanes up with phony grills, wheels instead of sticks, and interiors as much like cars as possible. Even upscale aircraft like Loening Amphibians were decorated and spoken of in limousine terms.

The lust for the best of both possible worlds also resulted in several attempts to combine the two in one vehicle, as best exemplified by the Fulton Airphibian and Molt Taylor's jewel, the Aerocar.

This infectious passion overcame even the director of the U.S. Bureau of Air Commerce, Eugene L. Vidal, a very experienced pilot trained in the Army Air Service, with a strong background in commercial air transportation. In a fit of enthusiasm, Vidal called for a national competition for an aircraft that would be right down in the Oldsmobile price range: $700, FAPD (Fly-Away Pipe Dream). It was also to be "foolproof —an achievement that still eludes all manufacturers. Vidal probably knew that, while what he was asking for was unachievable, he was certain to reap a harvest of interest in aviation. The winner of the competition was the twin-boom pusher Stearman Hammond using a Menasco engine, but it was considerably over the target price.

A more realistic competitor was the McGaffey Airplane Development Company's neat little Aviate, which used a converted Ford V-8. Neil McGaffey built the airplane in Pasadena, and Vance Breese flight-tested it at Mines Field in Los Angeles.

The announced price on the Aviate was a mere $1625. McGaffey planned to sell the engine, nominally rated at 100 horsepower but more likely generating about 95, for $350. The pod-like cabin, which featured a 1935-Ford-style grill forward and twin booms aft, carried two people. I've been told that Claire Vance had a hand in the design, and the aircraft is similar in outline to his famous Bendix entry.

The announced performance for the Aviate was creditable, with a top speed of 115 miles per hour, a cruise of 100, and a landing speed of only 38. The 34-foot-span, fabric-covered wing was built of solid spruce spars and metal ribs, with the rest of the aircraft almost all metal. The automobile motif was carried further with the use of a standard automobile radio, Ford brake drums, and other smaller components.

The Aviate appeared in mid-1935, and was in existence at least through August 1938. It would be interesting to learn of its ultimate disposition. The little monoplane would make a good radio-controlled model. For the buffs, the darker sections in the picture are battleship grey and the lighter are ivory grey, all trimmed in "green—for McGaffey—green."

Capt. Charles Spencer (Pan Am) wrote to say that his father, Capt. C. C. Spencer (Pan Am, Ret.), was a partner in the design. The senior Spencer is still flying actively with the California Forest Service. Other automobile-engined aircraft during the period included the Fahlin Plymocoupe, with a six-banger Plymouth engine; the Ford Arrow; the Campbell F (a really sleek airplane); the Horace Keene Ace; and others; but none caught on. In recent years we've seen Volkswagen, Porsche, Buick, and other automobile engines successfully converted to aircraft use. Maybe the Aviate's time has come at last!
 
A bit more background on the Vidal Safety Aircraft Competition (note that, though it got under way in 1934 it was first announced in November of 1933):




Wednesday, November 8, 1933:Director of Aeronautics Vidal announced a plan to make low-priced aircraft available for widespread private ownership. Vidal followed his announcement with a survey that indicated strong consumer interest in a plane priced at about $700. On December 28, the Public Works Administration (PWA) announced that $500,000 had been set aside for the development of such an airplane. U.S. aircraft manufacturers denounced the plan as unrealistic, however, and the PWA funds never materialized. The “Poor Man’s Airplane” project collapsed, but the Department of Commerce continued to promote development of affordable aircraft. (See July 19, 1934.)
Sunday, July 1, 1934:The name of the Aeronautics Branch was changed to Bureau of Air Commerce. At the same time, the title of the Director of Aeronautics was changed to Director of Air Commerce. The new name more accurately reflected the duties of the organization, which enjoyed the status of a bureau but had not been so designated. Also by this date there were no longer any major aeronautical functions that were structurally part of other Commerce Department bureaus.
Thursday, July 19, 1934:The Bureau of Air Commerce announced the creation of a Development Section to conduct and promote work on new types of aircraft, engines, and accessories, with specialization in the development of a low-priced airplane for general public use (see November 8, 1933). The new section reported directly to the Director of Air Commerce.
 
Last edited:
I was so sure I'd shared a photo of what was then a mysterious aircraft, but couldn't trace the topic despite my efforts. Our friend Tophe probably could have identified right away, since he mentions it in his Forked Ghosts and Catamarans du Ciel works, but he no longer visits this forum... Anyway, after three years of fruitless search, I happened one day on the page of a modeler who had built a nice 1:72 scale version of the elusive prototype!

Mr. Neil McGaffey from Inglewood, California, wanted to build a plane from out-of-the-shelf components: you would go to the auto parts store and get a couple of wheels, a dashboard, brakes, instruments, a seat, a big radiator, etc.
And so was born the McGaffey AV-8 Aviate (nothing new here, Mr. Harrier!). The engine was a Ford V-8. Landing lights were faired into the wheel pants. The hydraulic shock struts on the landing gear were McGaffey's own design. Wingspan was 34 ft. and wing area was 195.3 sq. ft.

I have never seen a photo of it in flight that could prove it was ever airborne, and though it probably was, it never received a Type Certificate or even a so-called Group 2 Memo approval.


Source for info/model:
www.aircraftresourcecenter.com/Gal9/8001-8100/gal8036-Aviate-Stern/00.shtm
I am related to Neal McGaffey. My father said that Neal tried to get it accepted and certified, but when WW II started, all interest evaporated, so he had to stop his pursuit of it. I do not know the ultimate disposition of the plane.
 
I am related to Neal McGaffey. My father said that Neal tried to get it accepted and certified, but when WW II started, all interest evaporated, so he had to stop his pursuit of it. I do not know the ultimate disposition of the plane.
Thanks a lot for dropping by and for the info! Here are a few additional tidbits I collected in recent years.
 

Attachments

  • 76782731_2332473296970491_7210260370605211648_n.jpg
    76782731_2332473296970491_7210260370605211648_n.jpg
    49.4 KB · Views: 19
  • 91324704_2011794368950679_8324659493195481088_n.jpg
    91324704_2011794368950679_8324659493195481088_n.jpg
    59.8 KB · Views: 19
  • PA 1935-10.jpg
    PA 1935-10.jpg
    84.8 KB · Views: 18
  • PA 1935-11.jpg
    PA 1935-11.jpg
    87.7 KB · Views: 28
There was a similar prototype built in the USA circa 1946. It was powered by an almost stock automobile engine (Ford?). Cantilever inverted gull wings connected the crew nacelle to a pair of pontoons that had tail feathers bolted to the rear ends.

More recently, an amphibian of similar configuration has been seen test-flying around DeLand Florida. The 4 to 6 seater Privateer also has cantilever inverted gull wings connecting the crew nacelle with twin floats. Tail feathers are bolted and glued to the rear ends of the floats/pontoons. The biggest difference is a (Walter?) turboprop engine mounted on the rear end of the crew nacelle.
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom