Lockheed Martin TR-X (RQ-X/UQ-2)

Thanks.

Of course LM is happy to talk about their products merits, whereas NG has to keep quiet about everything, so its hard to know exactly I suppose.
 
I suppose they can talk about it more as its aimed at Air Force & not other clients who might want an even greater degree of classification.
 
Air Force Skeptical Of Lockheed U-2 Replacement Advances Insidedefense.com

Lockheed Martin is courting the Air Force with a U-2 replacement, but service officials are not expressing enthusiasm for a new platform.

While Lockheed has not made a formal proposal yet to the Air Force, the company presented its high altitude TR-X program to the media Sept. 14. The company is proposing a stealthy, high altitude intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance platform which would leverage the existing U-2 engine, according to Scott Winstead, Lockheed’s strategic business manager for the U-2 program. The platform could be fielded as early as 2025, a Lockheed spokesman said.

During a Sept. 14 media roundtable, Air Force Gen. Robert Otto, deputy chief of staff for ISR, expressed skepticism over the TR-X, particularly regarding its stealth capabilities, which he said could drive up the cost of the platform.

“If we were going to look at a new platform, the question I’d ask is what else does that buy us?” he said. “It could be something worth looking at, but I don’t know yet.”

While the Global Hawk still unmanned air vehicle has several upgrades pending before it can reach parity with the U-2, those changes would cost significantly less than a new platform, according to Otto. Estimates on the cost of upgrading the Global Hawk with U-2 sensors have shifted, but Otto indicated that the addition of an electro-optical sensor and Optical Bar Camera are surmountable challenges for the Global Hawk. A Defense Department Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation analysis also showed Global Hawk’s cost per flying hour decreases in the late 2020’s, he said.

“I think we’ve got to come up with a solution to be able to image the Gaza Strip (and) Golan Heights in a similar image,” Otto said. “That would imply either finding a way to make the wide area sensor work or another payload adapter to put the Optical Bar Camera in there.”

Lockheed’s TR-X pitch may be unsolicited, but company officials argued the first generation U-2 platform also emerged out of an unsolicited program in its Skunk Works. The company is proposing to get ahead of the Air Force’s needs, even if the service has not asked for many of the upgrades that would come on the TR-X platform.

Lockheed is proposing an aircraft with longer wings for high altitudes, though its U-2 engine would only be able to lift the TR-X to 73,000 feet. The TR-X would also include multiple line of sight links to support communications gateways and collaborative operations, a new see and avoid system and electronically scanned array radar that would double the current U-2’s range, Winstead said.

“If you’re looking at the 2030-40 timeframe, how much is technology going to advance in our adversary’s portfolio?” Winstead said. “The new design allows you bring a modular payload, so you can be adaptable.” -- Leigh Giangreco
Click to expand...
 
http://breakingdefense.com/2015/09/bye-bye-u-2-cia-legend-allen-predicts-end-of-manned-reconnaissance/
 
Here's a higher-res image of LM's proposed TR-X (UQ-2). -SP
 

Attachments

  • LM TR-X Concep-smallt.jpg
    LM TR-X Concep-smallt.jpg
    109.8 KB · Views: 1,012
from http://www.lockheedmartin.com/us/news/features/2015/webt-u2-innovation.html
 

Attachments

  • lockheed_tr-x.jpg
    lockheed_tr-x.jpg
    330.2 KB · Views: 939
I assume this is a solution looking for a requirement like the SR-72 which is why we're hearing about it directly from LM.

The emphasis on communications makes me think that one of it's primary jobs will be acting as a relay node to allow aircraft/ships/ground forces with otherwise incomparable comms to communicate as the couple of converted civilian aircraft have been doing I've Afghanistan and elsewhere (can't remember the program name off hand).

Do we know much about whether special forces units are set up to talk directly with stealth aircraft with LPI comms?
 
I wonder if this Design study might be for an "optionally manned (er, inhabited)" aircraft?
The various airframers have referred to that technology as a possible option in their presentations for Hypothetical 6th generation fighter aircraft.
 
You're not missing much, event for LT that's a poor piece.
 
Flyaway said:
Not your fault but I refuse to visit a site that demands you turn off your ad blocker.
Click to expand...

Try it on your mobile and switch to reader mode in your mobile browser.
 
Changed its name again.

Lockheed's 30-aircraft TR-X plan priced at $3.8 billion

www.flightglobal.com

Lockheed's 30-aircraft TR-X plan priced at $3.8 billion

Lockheed Martin's plan to construct a fleet of 30 high-altitude, single-engined tactical reconnaissance aircraft from cannibalised U-2S Dragon Lady and RQ-4B Global Hawk components would take 10 years and cost approximately $3.8 billion if adopted, a company official says.
www.flightglobal.com www.flightglobal.com
 
Flyaway said:
Changed its name again.

Lockheed's 30-aircraft TR-X plan priced at $3.8 billion

https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/lockheeds-30-aircraft-tr-x-plan-priced-at-38-bill-423190/
Click to expand...

And no longer optionally manned, I see.
 
"single-engined tactical reconnaissance aircraft from cannibalised U-2S Dragon Lady and RQ-4B Global Hawk components would take 10 years"


It didn't take that long to go from a clean sheet to a flying Blackbird.
 
sferrin said:
"single-engined tactical reconnaissance aircraft from cannibalised U-2S Dragon Lady and RQ-4B Global Hawk components would take 10 years"


It didn't take that long to go from a clean sheet to a flying Blackbird.
Click to expand...

Indeed.
 
sferrin said:
"single-engined tactical reconnaissance aircraft from cannibalised U-2S Dragon Lady and RQ-4B Global Hawk components would take 10 years"


It didn't take that long to go from a clean sheet to a flying Blackbird.
Click to expand...

Re-read it. Their plan involves using U-2 components from "planes flying" as them come in for their scheduled rebuild. It's that rebuild schedule, based on the life of the U-2 airframes and the Global Hawks, that is making it take 10 years to build 30 of them. If they were building them from scratch, I am sure it would be much faster. IIRC, the Blackbirds weren't rebuilt using components of previously flying operational aircraft. ;)
 
TR-X Goes Black

—John A. Tirpak3/17/2016

Lockheed Martin will formally pitch the Air Force a program to replace the U-2 and Global Hawk in the coming months, Scott Winstead, the company’s strategic business manager, told reporters Tuesday. The aircraft will have low-observable, or stealth features, so previous images of what Lockheed calls the TR-X are obsolete, and the company won’t release new ones, he said. After long analysis, Lockheed determined that USAF will run seriously short of strategic air-breathing reconnaissance capacity and capability starting when the U-2 retires circa 2019, through the Global Hawk’s mid-2030s retirement. The jet would not be stealthy enough to survive in the toughest air defenses, but could be “risked” if a commander deems it necessary, Winstead said. Lockheed determined the “sweet spot” for operations and efficiency is 70,000 feet with one engine, giving the aircraft a 300-mile look over a target country’s borders. The company would re-use the U-2’s GE F118 engine, and sensors and software from the U-2 and Global Hawk to reduce costs, as the fleet transitions to a single-type unmanned platform. Though 77,000 feet was more operationally useful and survivable, “you need two engines to get there,” Winstead said, and the cost caused Lockheed to discard the two-engine option. Existing 45KVA generators—with ample room for growth—would also be used to power laser sensors and radars, and the wingspan would be the same as the Global Hawk’s to avoid USAF having to build new hangars. The jet would be autonomically air-refuelable to extend its mission time to around 40 hours, Winstead reported; longer than either the U-2’s 12-hour maximum or Global Hawk’s 22-hour limit. (See also High-Altitude ISR at Risk from the March issue of Air Force Magazine.)
 
huh
 

Attachments

  • MDC 1997 UCAV.jpg
    MDC 1997 UCAV.jpg
    808.1 KB · Views: 1,096
FighterJock said:
I think that was before McDonnell Douglas got taken over by Boeing.
Click to expand...
Captain O. agrees
 
High-altitude stakes soar for U-2 successor

www.flightglobal.com

OPINION: High-altitude stakes soar for U-2 successor

Since the Space Shuttle's final mission in 2011, Americans have had to explain to their children that the only way to space now is via a Russian Soyuz spacecraft, blasting off from Kazakhstan. This storyline is only being corrected with the development of the Boeing CST-100 Starliner and SpaceX...
www.flightglobal.com www.flightglobal.com
 
Lockheed’s TR-X Reconnaissance Aircraft Will Have Stealthy Shape, Skin
Aviation Week & Space Technology
As Russia and China develop advanced missile technologies that can shoot down aircraft from greater distances, the U.S. Air Force’s long-serving reconnaissance platforms—Lockheed Martin’s manned U-2 and Northrop Grumman’s Global Hawk unmanned aircraft systems (UAS)—are being forced to operate farther and farther from enemy borders. Lockheed Martin believes its Skunk Works has the answer to this challenge, revealing previously unknown details about the ...

Lockheed’s TR-X Reconnaissance Aircraft Will Have Stealthy Shape, Skin | Aviation Week Network

Successor to the U-2, the unmanned TR-X, will eventually have a stealthy shape and skin, allowing it to penetrate deep into enemy territory.
m.aviationweek.com m.aviationweek.com
 
Tangentially related.

Chris Pocock may know more about the U-2 than anyone who doesn’t possess a very high security clearance. He’s written four books about the planes and is passionate about the black beauties. Here’s his take on whether Northrop Grumman’s Global Hawk can rival or surpass the capabilities of the U-2. Read on. The Editor.
Click to expand...

http://breakingdefense.com/2017/03/u-2-expert-says-global-hawk-just-cant-compare/
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom