Es muy difícil argumentar contra argumentos falsos y leyendas urbanas, de las que está lleno el libro de Burzaco. Además de que tus publicaciones tienen una marcada ideología, a diferencia del creador de este tema, quien fue expulsado de este foro por llenar todas sus publicaciones de politiquería.
La compra del Sabre la explica perfectamente su protagonista en el texto de mi post anterior, se explica por qué fueron rechazados los Sabre canadienses con motor Orenda y también se explica por qué FAA finalmente se decantó por los Sabre usados de 28 de USA. Las ventajas financieras y operativas de la compra son obvias.
El Pulqui II no entró en producción porque Perón decidió que la prioridad era el consumo interno, por lo que la mayor parte del presupuesto se destinó a la producción de motocicletas, automóviles, utilitarios, refrigeradores, hornos, maquinaria agrícola, etc.
También como lo explican Tank, Horten y muchos otros. El único prototipo debía exhibirse en todas las ferias patrocinadas por el gobierno que había, por lo que los tiempos de pruebas en vuelo y en tierra se ampliaron innecesariamente debido a estas necesidades publicitarias.
Finalmente, Tank comenzó a desvincularse de las FMA antes del golpe porque las condiciones económicas de su contrato no eran óptimas debido a la alta inflación en la última etapa del gobierno de Perón y que había perdido el apoyo político del General.
There are two opinions here. Just because you don't like it doesn't mean that they are the wrong ones and the ones you like are the true ones.
The reality (beyond the political positions of each one) is that there was a popular and democratically elected government by the majority of Argentines.
It might have some errors, but overall, it represented an improvement in the situation in the country.
Let us not forget that we were coming from a stage where we were practically a colony of the United Kingdom, there were large businesses, labor exploitation, almost no unionization, little industrial development, etc., etc.
The book gives a version of that airplane purchase.
Beyond that, I emphasize again that there was a coup d'état, supported by a minority ideologically allied to the USA.
For some reason, many of the works of the Peronist government tried to destroy, stop or go back.
We all have ideology.
There could be some economic problems during the Justicialist government. But his overthrow was not the solution, as you seem to justify.
In this case, during Peronism social improvements were promoted and at least for the crisis, they did not make the poorest, nor the majority of the country, pay.
The industrial development of Peronism is indisputable.
No matter how much you try to belittle it, with the famous catchphrase of "propaganda." Social Justice was a reality.
Those who came later took us to a lamentable state.
Repression, torture, murders, Armed Forces acting as internal police, etc.
The manufacturing of cars, tractors and other items was prioritized as they were most needed. But that didn't mean leaving airplanes aside.
General Perón's idea was a self-sufficient country with independence.
And to maintain that independence, it was necessary to have weapons and manufacture them.
I don't see it as something bad to expose technological achievements to the general public, on the contrary, it helped to publicize the advances.
Perón bought (among other weapons) about 400 airplanes. Also, those that were manufactured locally.
Some had to be replaced: 100 Calquín, 100 Gloster Meteor, etc.
If you want to show that replacing more than 200 airplanes with less than 30 is a good business, it seems somewhat naive to me.
That's why ideology doesn't allow you to see reality objectively.
