- Joined
- 1 May 2007
- Messages
- 2,530
- Reaction score
- 1,731
While looking for something else, I came across this,
from page 408 of Putnam's 'Handley Page'...
" ...the more urgent aspects of improving bomber effectiveness had become
Godrey Lee’s direct concern in December 1941, when he reported on the
optimisation of high-altitude bomber design. Lee suggested an aircraft of
Halifax size, but of much better aerodynamic shape and lower drag, with
four Merlin 60 engines mounted transversely in pairs, buried in a forward
extension of the centre-section leading edge, with each pair geared to a
contra-rotating coaxial airscrew unit mounted in a slender nacelle at each
end of the centre-section, thereby combining the power and reliability of
four engines withthe low drag of a half-submerged twin powerplant installation.
This project would have been heavily defended with nose, dorsal and
ventral turrets, and would have had a nosewheel and a sideways-retracting
main undercarriage. Lee’s proposal was too advanced and idealistic for
immediate implementation in 1942 and he did not attempt to design the
structure in detail, but concurrent experience with the Consolidated B-24
Liberator had shown the benefit of choosing a high aspect ratio."
Does anyone have any more information on this?
cheers,
Robin.
[font=]
[/font]
from page 408 of Putnam's 'Handley Page'...
" ...the more urgent aspects of improving bomber effectiveness had become
Godrey Lee’s direct concern in December 1941, when he reported on the
optimisation of high-altitude bomber design. Lee suggested an aircraft of
Halifax size, but of much better aerodynamic shape and lower drag, with
four Merlin 60 engines mounted transversely in pairs, buried in a forward
extension of the centre-section leading edge, with each pair geared to a
contra-rotating coaxial airscrew unit mounted in a slender nacelle at each
end of the centre-section, thereby combining the power and reliability of
four engines withthe low drag of a half-submerged twin powerplant installation.
This project would have been heavily defended with nose, dorsal and
ventral turrets, and would have had a nosewheel and a sideways-retracting
main undercarriage. Lee’s proposal was too advanced and idealistic for
immediate implementation in 1942 and he did not attempt to design the
structure in detail, but concurrent experience with the Consolidated B-24
Liberator had shown the benefit of choosing a high aspect ratio."
Does anyone have any more information on this?
cheers,
Robin.
[font=]
[/font]