Drones and how to kill them?

Good ol shrapnel shells could make a return but it would require advanced ranging equipment. Organ guns could also become a thing again but it could be costly. How effective are proxy fuzes against the average plastic drone?
 
Scott Kenny said:
Gigawatt?

Must be pulsing pretty hard, like 1600W for a fraction of a second.
Click to expand...
Yeah, I've been meaning to look into that. A GW is a hell of a lot unless it's only for a very short time. This is all I could find. It's probably 1kJ over a microsecond or something.


blockhaj said:
Good ol shrapnel shells could make a return but it would require advanced ranging equipment. Organ guns could also become a thing again but it could be costly. How effective are proxy fuzes against the average plastic drone?
Click to expand...
Sometimes I think the best defence is simply more drones and preferably more autonomous ones to hunt down and kill the people launching these things, as well as more long range strike weapons to blow up the people and places responsible for manufacturing them, as well as any supporting industries, plus their logistics routes to the front lines. As usual the best defence is more offence.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1790771347859112335
View: https://x.com/AirPowerNEW1/status/1790771347859112335

https://twitter.com/x/status/1790878167667704038
View: https://x.com/AirPowerNEW1/status/1790878167667704038


https://twitter.com/x/status/1790890073782698217
View: https://x.com/AirPowerNEW1/status/1790890073782698217
 
Last edited:
Forest Green said:
https://twitter.com/x/status/1790322386803274027
View: https://x.com/AirPowerNEW1/status/1790322386803274027

View attachment 728832
Click to expand...
A microwave blunderbuss..”Honey, I cooked the kids!”

Pure Captain Video.

Other drone killing arrays look like sheet rock covered road signs…

Drones may just have gotten deadlier
techxplore.com

New advance in wireless communications could help precisely pinpoint the locations of people and objects

Engineers from University of Glasgow and colleagues from the U.K. and Australia are behind a research breakthrough in a developing form of wireless communications could help precisely pinpoint the locations of people and objects indoors.
techxplore.com techxplore.com

Gee, thanks a bunch Big Brother…

Yikes
hackaday.com

New Quadcopter Speed World Record Set At Nearly 500 Km/h

Making a quadcopter go fast would seem to be quite simple: just strap on powerful motors, aim the quadcopter roughly at where you want it to go fast, and let ‘er rip. Because of aerodynamics …
hackaday.com hackaday.com
 
Last edited:
Given the proliferation of microwave anti-drone devices, is there any difference in vulnerability between fully autonomous and data-linked or pilot-in-the-loop drones?

I'd suspect that if you have comms aerials it's going to help couple RF-energy into the innards, but is it a significant difference?
 
The Houthis are racking up a pretty impressive kill-count... Have we reached the end of the Predator?

For drones, what I simply don't understand is why not AHEAD rounds from a 30-50mm autocannon - and building simply a ton of them. Is the defended area difference between that and AWPKS really that great? Every base needs point defenses so bring back (heavily modernized) AAA at WW2 scale.
 
DrRansom said:
The Houthis are racking up a pretty impressive kill-count... Have we reached the end of the Predator?
Click to expand...
I mean, it's not like Predators or Reapers have any defensive systems installed in them... No chaff or flares, no radar detectors to know they've been illuminated, no missile approach and warning systems...

Why is anyone expecting a completely undefended airframe to be able to fly around in contested skies?!?


DrRansom said:
For drones, what I simply don't understand is why not AHEAD rounds from a 30-50mm autocannon - and building simply a ton of them. Is the defended area difference between that and AWPKS really that great? Every base needs point defenses so bring back (heavily modernized) AAA at WW2 scale.
Click to expand...
Well, the 35mm AHEAD guns have a 4000m max altitude and a max range of ~4000m under radar control. APKWS has more like a 10km range.
 
Scott Kenny said:
I mean, it's not like Predators or Reapers have any defensive systems installed in them... No chaff or flares, no radar detectors to know they've been illuminated, no missile approach and warning systems...

Why is anyone expecting a completely undefended airframe to be able to fly around in contested skies?!?
Click to expand...
The skies of the Middle East's backward states used to be uncontested and perfect for the Predator, but now even Yemen is heavily contested. That's quite a change.

As for the rest, yes, to get 6 kind-of betrays a lack of imagination by US planners.

Scott Kenny said:
Well, the 35mm AHEAD guns have a 4000m max altitude and a max range of ~4000m under radar control. APKWS has more like a 10km range.
Click to expand...

It obviously won't be answered here, but what is APKWS range from ground launch against a moving target? The 10km range quoted may be air-launched against fixed target - a different range equation entirely.
 
DrRansom said:
It obviously won't be answered here, but what is APKWS range from ground launch against a moving target? The 10km range quoted may be air-launched against fixed target - a different range equation entirely.
Click to expand...
I think in this case the air-launch platform would have been a hovering heli though, so not that much difference.
 
"Israel is examining the M61 Vulcan cannon to counter drones, according to the Israel Defense Forces, with local media reporting the weapon would go atop armored personnel carriers deployed along the northern border // The Israel-based Alma Research and Education Center recently estimated that Hezbollah has more than 2,500 UAVs "

In effect bringing back the M163 VADS built in the 60's and 70's, with the 20mm Mk 149 round with its sub-caliber 12 mm depleted uranium penetrator effective range claimed to be 2.5 km.

www.defensenews.com

Israel examines M61 Vulcan for countering drones

The potential acquisition comes as Israel clashes with the Lebanon-based militant group Hezbollah, which has launched drones and missiles toward Israel.
www.defensenews.com www.defensenews.com
 
Sineva said:
You can see how difficult it is for the kamov to knock this thing out just using what I`m` assuming to be a door gunner.In the end they practically have to get right on top of this thing to take it out.
I`m honestly surprised that they`re not using a dedicated attack helo,tho these might all be needed at the front.
Barring that using something like the AT-6 atgm would seem to be the better less risky choice,imho anyway.
https://twitter.com/x/status/1787435628126228590
Click to expand...
Heres the view from inside the kamov during an interception,looks like a door gunner and also pilot operated twin 2 barrel gun pods from the sound of it.
Why they dont just use an atgm I honestly dont know..... :rolleyes:
https://twitter.com/x/status/1787449070270701670
 
DrRansom said:
The Houthis are racking up a pretty impressive kill-count... Have we reached the end of the Predator?

For drones, what I simply don't understand is why not AHEAD rounds from a 30-50mm autocannon - and building simply a ton of them. Is the defended area difference between that and AWPKS really that great? Every base needs point defenses so bring back (heavily modernized) AAA at WW2 scale.
Click to expand...

I suspect boring industrial issues are why EAPS had been killed, in favor of pursuing HPMs and modifications of existing ordnance, but I don't really have any evidence for this or anything. Introducing a novel ammunition is hard though, and between XM913's 50x228mm and EAPS's 50x330mm, the former wins because it's an existing inventory munition.

You just compensate by slapping an octuple rack of APKWS on the side of an air defense M913-armed PABM-spitting M37 Linebacker II.

DrRansom said:
The skies of the Middle East's backward states used to be uncontested and perfect for the Predator, but now even Yemen is heavily contested. That's quite a change.

As for the rest, yes, to get 6 kind-of betrays a lack of imagination by US planners.
Click to expand...

It's probably the same reason a Nighthawk got killed in Kosovo. Mission planning is more heavily constrained by political considerations than the alternative. Still, better six Reapers, than six AH-64s, or a single JSF though.

Spare UAS should just be stockpiled in flat pack crates, like how the Essexes stockpiled spare F4Us on the hangar ceiling hooks, tbh. Don't publicize the loss rates because it's a robot and it has no family, so there's no need to make a big deal about it.
 
Have there been attempts to use MMW radar to detect drones and cue an RCWS to shoot at them?

The main issue that seems to be occurring is that its hard to detect FPV drones in the first place. Jamming seems to have worked quite well against off-the-shelf drones, as the rates at which they are being used seems to have declined, and it seems like both sides are now using purpose-built drones, which are more expensive. I think passive means such as cage and bar armour might be somewhat effective against smaller drones, but modifying APS to counter drones as well would be a much better option. Active measures require means of detection, and I'm not sure what advancements have been made on that front. Perhaps MMW radar could be a solution?
 
Sineva said:
Heres the view from inside the kamov during an interception,looks like a door gunner and also pilot operated twin 2 barrel gun pods from the sound of it.
Why they dont just use an atgm I honestly dont know..... :rolleyes:
https://twitter.com/x/status/1787449070270701670
Click to expand...
There were times when the heli was close enough that if the drone had exploded, they would have been in trouble. It wasn't smart at all.
 
Jason Dykstra (Wyvern) said:
Have there been attempts to use MMW radar to detect drones and cue an RCWS to shoot at them?

The main issue that seems to be occurring is that its hard to detect FPV drones in the first place. Jamming seems to have worked quite well against off-the-shelf drones, as the rates at which they are being used seems to have declined, and it seems like both sides are now using purpose-built drones, which are more expensive. I think passive means such as cage and bar armour might be somewhat effective against smaller drones, but modifying APS to counter drones as well would be a much better option. Active measures require means of detection, and I'm not sure what advancements have been made on that front. Perhaps MMW radar could be a solution?
Click to expand...
That what the Army and Marines be using for their new Short range ADA system. Ku and shorter bands which work just fine for smacking small FPV drones.
 
uk 75 said:
This thread is not intended to discuss any individual countries use of drones as UAV are now called.
consortiq.com

A Not-So-Short History of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) - Consortiq

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV), or drones, have a very storied history. In fact, UAVs go back as far as 1783! Here's what to know.
consortiq.com consortiq.com
Rather it is to have a place where we can look at general developments in UAV technology and ways to kill drones.
Drones offer a cheaper and easier to use alternative to aircraft, missiles, and a range of systems.
Current drones are small and cheap. killing them needs expensive weapons designed to shoot down planes and missiles.
Perhaps we need to go back to more basic weapons like shotguns and cannons slaved to effective jamming and detection systems.
Click to expand...
Interference and detection is the key, although given the massive Iranian drone attack on Israel, if it is not surprising, then it will not cause damage, it is a low-grade weapon, I do not think it will work so easily against a professional and experienced army like the American one. despite being a very widespread method due to the lack of resources and an army overestimated in power like the Russian one.
 

Attachments

  • New Plane Schemes 27.jpg
    New Plane Schemes 27.jpg
    42.5 KB · Views: 6

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom