Designing Escort ships

uk 75

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
27 September 2006
Messages
5,744
Reaction score
5,634
The armament of escort ships has become increasingly complicated.
Up until 1960 a typical Royal Navy frigate needed only a gun of some kind and anti submarine mortars or torpedos. Accordingly the vessels could be built in some numbers.
By 1970 the helicopter had become an essential tool for any RN escort ship. A basic point defence missile system (Seacat) had replaced the 40mm gun.
In the 1970s more missiles arrived. Ikara for ASW Exocet for anti-ship and Seadart and Seawolf for air defence.
26 gun and helicopter carrying Leander class ships gave way to smaller numbers of conversions (Leanders with Ikara, Exocet or Seawolf) and new build ships (T42 with Seadart and T22 with Seawolf).
By the end of the Cold War the new RN frigate (T23) carried a range of weapons unimaginable in 1960. A large ASW helo (Merlin) could be carried. Harpoon SSMs and Seawolf PDMS could deal with Soviet threats that had emerged since 1960.
Not surprisingly (except to journalists and the public) the numbers of escort ships fell dramatically.
The end of the Cold War froze RN frigate procurement for thirty years. But the 12 remaining T42 Air Defence destroyers were eventually replaced by six T45 destroyers. In US terms this was like replacing Perry class frigates with Burke destroyers.
Since 1991 RN ships have had to be able to take on a broad range of peacetime policing and relief tasks while still being able to shoot down missiles in the Gulf or provide air defences for the 2012 Olympics.
The threat from China, N Korea, Iran and Russia is not as coherent as that posed by the Soviets in the 80s. But the range of weapons at their disposal is daunting.
The six T45 are being joined by handfuls of T26 and T31 frigates. Each one of these ships is probably more capable than the whole RN frigate force in 1960 but numbers have shrunk to the figures of the 1939 battleship and battlecruiser fleet.
 
On some levels, I think that the UKRN has really let their force levels drop below a sustainable point.

There was a time when they had zero deployable submarines. Two or three were in drydock for scheduled maintenance, the others were all broke for some reason or another.

You really need about 12 ships of any given type to be able to have 3 at sea. You should be able to have 4 at sea with 12 ships of the type, but there may be one down for whatever reason. Nobody likes admitting it, but it's life and things break.
 
Until 2014 the main focus for the UK"s limited defence budget was the "war on terror" sending our small force of Army and Royal Marines around the world.
The RAF had to give up its Harrier and Tornado forces to focus on Typhoon and F35B.
The 1997 Strategic Defence Review commited the RN to building two new aircraft carriers. But with no extra money the RN had to reduce its escort and SSN force.
I have always believed that decisions in 1966, 1970 and 1981 to focus on SSNs and escorts rather than carriers were correct. The SSN force reached double figures and 13 T23 frigates entered service replacing old more manpower intensive ships.
Choices are never positive. I would have used the money spent on QE/PoW to build more SSNs and add to the escort force.
Savings could still be found by removing the amphibious sealift forces. Most of the time the RM fly into trouble spots or operate in penny packets from escorts. In a NATO contingency allied (US) shipping would be available.
 
Back
Top Bottom