Boeing Wichita Model 200 / Boeing Model 451 "Scout" (Army YL-15)

Stargazer

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
25 June 2009
Messages
13,793
Reaction score
3,120
Everyone knows this oddball observation aircraft, and yet it never had a dedicated topic here until today.

The Boeing Wichita (formerly Stearman division) Model 200 "Scout" was also known as the Model 451. It was a high-wing, single-engine all-metal two-seater, with conventional gear. The inverted vertical stabilizer was meant to provide good spin damping and to reduce the overall height of the airplane. The rudder and elevator were fabric-covered. The configuration chosen provided maximum visibility for the observer and good flight control at low speed. It could also be disassembled and transported by truck.

The Model 451-2 was presented on March 1, 1946 by Boeing in response to a letter dated February 4 from Colonel George E. Price of the A.T.S.C., announcing an informal design competition for a field artillery observation aircraft, and requesting bids. The program received the designation MX-848.

Boeing received an order as per contract W33-038-ac-15054. Two XL-15 prototype was built and ten more YL-15 preseries aircraft followed, but on completion of the test phase, the Army rejected the design. The ten YL-15s were consequently transfered to the U.S. Forest Service and the Department of the Interior, which operated them with civil registrations.

As a result, the subsequent order for 47 production L-15-BW aircraft was cancelled.

1714071168957.png

1714071897977.png

1714071913776.png

1714071992092.png

1714071940001.png

1714071958845.png
 
Last edited:
but on completion of the test phase, the Army rejected the design.

Any idea what caused the Army to reject it? Flying characteristics must have been at least somewhat acceptable or the other agencies wouldn't have taken them.
 
Any idea what caused the Army to reject it? Flying characteristics must have been at least somewhat acceptable or the other agencies wouldn't have taken them.
Hmm. Boeing is the company I have the most books about, yet none of them seems to be specific about the reasons for rejection. My hunch is that it had less to do with the aircraft being an underperformer than a rapid change in Army needs. I'll keep searching some more, the answer might be in some book or article.

Here is what I have on the Scout from various books (only those I have scans of):

1714076842503.png
Source: Boeing - The Complete Story (Haynes)

1714076911249.png
1714077008878.png
1714077046899.png
Source: Boeing Aircraft Since 1916 (Putnam)


 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom