What should such a book be called?
SAAB's thought process?
SAAB's thought experiments?
SAAB's combat aircraft projects?
SAAB's air force projects?
I am interested. I like the last name, but maybe add a date to it (EX: 1940 - 1950).
Or maybe i should just call it Swedish secret air force projects and include weaponry as well?

Swedish secret air force projects: 1926-1976?
I like it. It sounds nice.
 
I should write a book or something on this. There are so much shit that SAAB designed over the years. Anyone interested in that?
I have already the money ready to buy that :D
Well i need funding for the book :p

What i need to write such a book:
  • A full season busscard. (ca 1000 euro)
  • Rent money for a year: (ca 4200 euro)
  • Material money (document scans) (idk 1000 euro?)
  • Someone who can draw detailed and correct aircraft blueprints based on old linedrawings etc.
  • Beer money to not go mad. (ca 1300 euro)
  • A contact at Saab to clear up all their modern projects and numbers etc.
Ok: I'll start to buy a lot of lottery tickets! I'll call you if I'll win something :D
 
Hi! 1300-71D. (1371D).
Wing plan form and horizontal tail stabilizer shape between wind tunnel test model and three side view drawing are different.
Three side view drawing source : AIR Enthusiast No.90, SECRET SAAB PROJECTS, Tony Buttler.

https://intscalemodeller.com/viewtopic.php?t=25589
https://tecnodefesa.com.br/saab-36-o-bombardeiro-supersonico-da-suecia/

"1300 Project
The end of World War II showed that humanity would enter, for decades to come, a polarized and tense world.
For the countries of Europe, the epicenter of this division of the world, there were moments of anguish and apprehension about the spectre of communism that was advancing mainly throughout Eastern Europe.
The scenario was even worse for non-aligned nations and, like Sweden. With relatively small territory, a lean economy that could not invest large amounts in defence and was immediately in front of the former Soviet Union, it was necessary to have deterrent elements to prevent its territory from being invaded in the event of a conflict.
Although qualitatively inferior, the military might of the countries of the former Warsaw Pact was much higher in numerical terms.
The scenario was even worse for non-aligned nations and, like Sweden. With relatively small territory, a lean economy that could not invest large amounts in defence and was immediately in front of the former Soviet Union, it was necessary to have deterrent elements to prevent its territory from being invaded in the event of a conflict.
One of the moves to ensure their safety was studies for the creation of nuclear weapons.
Although the country later did not effectively develop these weapons, it was necessary to have a vector that would transport and launch the bomb at the target.
It was then that the Project 1300, a supersonic bomber designed to reach altitudes of 60,000 feet (or 18,200m), maximum speed of Mach 2.14 (2,642km/h) and take a crew member, emerged. At 17m long and 9.6m in wingspan, the empty weight was nine tonnes and could carry an 800kg pump internally. Its engines were two Bristol Olympus engines, the same as the English Avro Vulcan bombers.
Apparently two other studies were done for the project which also became known as Saab A36. For both cases it would be single-engine, one version with the air intake under the fuselage (A36-76C) and the other with on this (A-36-77A)."
 

Attachments

  • Bj_xLd2IAAAqph1.jpg
    Bj_xLd2IAAAqph1.jpg
    92.6 KB · Views: 609
  • JPM_7572.jpg
    JPM_7572.jpg
    366.6 KB · Views: 336
  • 40027107010_9fba872db6_b.jpg
    40027107010_9fba872db6_b.jpg
    46.3 KB · Views: 398
  • saab-a36-comcept-model.jpg
    saab-a36-comcept-model.jpg
    68.7 KB · Views: 425
  • 1371D.jpg
    1371D.jpg
    205.1 KB · Views: 454
Last edited:
I think this wind tunnel test model wing shape and horizontal tail stabilizer shape looks like project 1338's one.
But fuselage shape is different.
 

Attachments

  • 1338.jpg
    1338.jpg
    116.1 KB · Views: 422

Attachments

  • The Saab 1508 A2 was to be powered by three RB168 Spey engines.jpg
    The Saab 1508 A2 was to be powered by three RB168 Spey engines.jpg
    20.6 KB · Views: 386
  • Project 1534 as it appeared on 10 January 1962..jpg
    Project 1534 as it appeared on 10 January 1962..jpg
    24.5 KB · Views: 351
  • A three-view of the 1562 project. Presented in November 1961, this configuration looks like a ...jpg
    A three-view of the 1562 project. Presented in November 1961, this configuration looks like a ...jpg
    19.5 KB · Views: 339
  • The aircraft 37 TK 1 (type configuration 1) as it looked on 6 June 1962..jpg
    The aircraft 37 TK 1 (type configuration 1) as it looked on 6 June 1962..jpg
    25.6 KB · Views: 547

Attachments

  • 12295378_1234576159902947_8693448620409220002_n.jpg
    12295378_1234576159902947_8693448620409220002_n.jpg
    176.3 KB · Views: 564
  • tumblr_64968a392598753319f3d4c23d633f88_643a7665_640.jpg
    tumblr_64968a392598753319f3d4c23d633f88_643a7665_640.jpg
    94.7 KB · Views: 585
Last edited:

Attachments

  • FVMF.003218.jpg
    FVMF.003218.jpg
    3.3 MB · Views: 414
  • FVMF.003219.jpg
    FVMF.003219.jpg
    3 MB · Views: 309
BTW: J-51 doesn't fit too much with Flygvapnet number series. The contemporary Draken was J-35, while the much later Viggen was "37" and Gripen is "39". Following the sequence I imagine that J-51 is expected to be used for some Flygvatnet frontline fighter in a distant future.
Saab's numbering systems did wander about a bit. The J-51 does have good credentials, being first published in a contemporary Swedish journal. It looks not unlike the first iteration of the Lildraken, before they cut back the intakes. A reasonable guess might be that it was the initial fighter design study which led to the Lildraken, and that the resulting Draken proper was then developed based on the success of the Lildraken's midlife nose job.
Intriguingly, it is basically a double-delta flying wing with twin engines which presumably had to find room later for a single but much larger engine.
 
Is there more information about this variant of the Saab 18 :
  • B 18R - Suggested jet variant equipped with STAL jet engines. The project came fairly far and an airframe was selected to be converted into the prototype in 1945. The plan was never followed through due to the development of the T 18B taking priority.
 
Beat me to it.

Which tallies with the top one stemming from a slightly more recent periodical than the bottom one.
 
So the J 29 with aden cannons was prototyped.
ywB8yyi.jpg

mqDyqlW.jpg
Here is an update on this test from the Swedish Historical Aviation Forum: https://forum.flyghistoria.org/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=8775
See the latest post.
 
From this Russian magazine.
 

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    709.4 KB · Views: 258
  • 0.png
    0.png
    1.1 MB · Views: 257
Hi,

SK 29 – Planned training version. It could have featured a two-seated cockpit, with seats placed side-by-side, no armament and limited fuel capacity. Cancelled.
J 29R – All-weather fighter version equipped with an air intercept radar. Cancelled.

 
Hi,

SK 29 – Planned training version. It could have featured a two-seated cockpit, with seats placed side-by-side, no armament and limited fuel capacity. Cancelled.
J 29R – All-weather fighter version equipped with an air intercept radar. Cancelled.

29R
 

Attachments

  • 1715520423343.png
    1715520423343.png
    413.3 KB · Views: 89
  • 1715520440048.png
    1715520440048.png
    216.8 KB · Views: 101
No drawing F.L.

From the same site,

Saab 37 Eurofighter – Proposed replacement for NATO F-104 Starfighter. None built.
Saab 37 X – Proposed version to be exported to Norway. None built.

 
Is there any drawings of the SK 29 ?
Apparently there were two variants of the Sk29: one with side-by-side cockpit and the other with tandem seating.
 

Attachments

  • sk29andj29rdrawings.jpg
    sk29andj29rdrawings.jpg
    73.1 KB · Views: 101
  • sk29sidebysideimpression.jpg
    sk29sidebysideimpression.jpg
    59 KB · Views: 96
  • sk29tandem.jpg
    sk29tandem.jpg
    81.6 KB · Views: 104
J 29R - I have read that it was also considered to place the radome in the center of the air inlet. Any known drawings?
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom