Work: Sixty Percent of U.S. Navy and Air Force Will Be Based in Pacific by 2020

Triton

Donald McKelvy
Senior Member
Joined
14 August 2009
Messages
9,707
Reaction score
2,055
Website
deeptowild.blogspot.com
"Work: Sixty Percent of U.S. Navy and Air Force Will Be Based in Pacific by 2020"
By: Sam LaGrone
Published: September 30, 2014 8:57 PM
Updated: September 30, 2014 8:57 PM

Source:
http://news.usni.org/2014/09/30/work-sixty-percent-u-s-navy-air-force-will-based-pacific-2020

More than half of U.S. Air Force and Navy forces will be based in the Asia Pacific by 2020 as part of the Pentagon’s rebalance to the Pacific, Deputy Secretary of Defense Bob Work said during a Tuesday address at the Council of Foreign Relations in Washington, D.C.

“We may not have as many forces as we would like, but 60 percent of the forces will be in the Asia Pacific region,” Work said.
“At the same time, [Pacific Command] is regaining Army units that were rotating through Afghanistan, and they’re returning with all of their equipment now, such as attack aviation assets like Apaches [attack helicopters]in Korea.”

In addition to numbers, Work said the U.S. military will base some its newest capabilities in the Pacific.

“The F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) is going to go first to the Pacific. By 2018, the very stealthy and highly capable Zumwalt destroyer [DDG-1000] will be based in the Pacific, we hope,” Work said.
“We’re putting more Aegis ballistic missile defense ships in Japan, and we’ve put a second TPY-2 missile defense radar in Japan… which closes an important gap in our sensor net.”

Work has been given the responsibility to oversee the Pacific rebalance. As part of that role, he recently returned from an extensive tour of the region.

“The purpose of my trip was to observe firsthand what was going on to the adjustments we were making to our presence out there and to discuss the strategic environment with our allies, specifically the Republic of Korea and Japan,” he said.

Work addressed the ongoing conflict between China and Japan over the Senkaku (or Diaoyu) — which both countries claim but Japan controls.

Work said that the U.S. didn’t have an interest who ultimately controlled the islands but said if China moved against Japan militarily, the U.S. would aid Japan.

“While the Senkakus are under Japanese control, Article 5 [of the Japan – U.S. Security Treaty] applies, and we would respond if there was an attempt to take the Senkakus, and we would support our Japanese allies,” Work said.

Responding to a larger question of Chinese and Russian ambitions in the Pacific, Work said the U.S. would need to carefully engage with the pair.

“They clearly are staking out their position in their near abroads,” he said.
“And this is one of the things that we’re going to have to work out over the course of the next several years on what they consider to be areas of their vital interest, and what we have to do is find a means by which to make sure that those desires do not resort to the use of force and would require an overt response militarily from us. We have to work these out and make sure that Russia and China feel secure in their near abroads.”

Work stressed that the rebalance would occur under the umbrella of ongoing budget pressure.

“The important goal that we’re trying to wrestle with right now under intense budget pressure is to get the proper mix between the forces that are forward presence forces and those based in the United States and our U.S. territories, which are our surge forces,” he said.
“That’s what we’re trying to do.”
 
How has progress been on doing this since then? Especially considering current tensions with China. I really do hope they go down...
 
Not likely, in fact we are probably going to see many more aggressive actions from the PRC, a matter of time only now. The PRC is generally being bullish and ignoring agreements around its borders.
 
The Americans are bent on hard containment and have begun dismembering high-end Chinese corporations like Huawei and TikTok using cybersecurity concerns as political cover, and are blowing every little border scrap out of proportion to provide yet more political cover for economic and military alliances in the Indo-Pacific.

With the American military (vs. the Chinese economic) advantage, it is in Washington's interests that the competition with the Chinese take on a more distinctly military character in the short term until the Chinese economy can be counterbalanced by other growing economies in the region.

A less charitable view would be that the United States, in addition to offshore balancing, has crushing the Chinese and maintaining overwhelming American hegemony as a stretch goal.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom