When the Wright brothers left the ground 105 times and the witnesses of 1904 in wonderment

Status
Not open for further replies.

simplex

I really should change my personal text
Joined
14 June 2017
Messages
2
Reaction score
9
The Wrights and their impossible 1904 flights

This is the most recent free book about one of the greatest technical frauds of the twentieth century. The work is based only on primary sources, mainly documents of the period 1903-1905, in majority letters of the two brothers and the answers received by them, plus newspaper articles (all quoted in full).

After reading the letters and articles you start to ask yourself how is it possible that so many authors credit Wilbur and Orville Wright with building the first heavier-than-air man carrying plane that ever flew when, in fact, the two inventors just tried to fool the newspapers (especially those of Dayton), Octave Chanute (a personality of the aeronautic world of the time), Georges Spratt (a fellow aviation enthusiast), Carl Diesentbach (the New York correspondent of the German journal "Illustrierte Aeronautische Mitteilungen") and both the US War Department and British War Office, by pretending they had performed no less than 105 flights in 1904 and, in many instances, describing aerial trips that are physically impossible, like the ones of August 13, 1904, when the plane, Flyer II, got energy from the headwind, which accelerated the apparatus.

"The Press", the only newspaper that, on May 26, 1904, furnished a list of witnesses (friends of the Wright family and an unnamed reporter) who saw the alleged flight of the same day, later in the year, on December 17, 1904, acknowledged that nobody had ever seen the two inventors flying powered planes.

The-Wrights-and-their-impossible-1904-flights 10 percent.jpg

"The Wrights and their impossible 1904 flights", by Bogdan Lazar, April 5, 2021.
 
You are Bogdan Lazar and I claim my prize.

Honestly, It's very hard to read and I'm not sure why I should try. I'm sure the Wright Brothers probably exaggerated their successes and minimised their problems. They were entrepreneurs, it kind of goes with the territory. In contrast this article is desperate to claim first flight for anyone else, no matter how minuscule their achievement.
 
Last edited:
This discussion will lead to nothing here.
Who is interested in it, should get the mentioned free book, and then maybe
discuss it with the author directly.
Cleaned and locked
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom