Wayne Hale: "How We Nearly Lost Discovery."

R

RGClark

Guest
How We Nearly Lost Discovery.
Posted on April 18, 2012
Now that Discovery is safely delivered to the Smithsonian, I think I can tell the story of how we nearly lost her in July of 2005, and how well-intentioned, highly motivated, hard-working, smart people can miss the most obvious.
It’s tough to know people who have died. Many of us knew the astronauts on Challenger and Columbia well. We had met with them daily, we had visited in their homes, we knew their families, their children. It is not an easy thing to lose a colleague; especially one who entrusted their safety to you. So don’t question whether we were motivated to prevent another loss.
Discovery was the shuttle return to flight vehicle after the Challenger was lost; two and a half years were spent from January 28, 1986 until Discovery flew in September 1988. Many improvements were made which resulted in a safe space flight.
Discover was the shuttle return to flight vehicle after Columbia was lost; two and half years were spent from February 1, 2003 until Discovery flew in July 2005. Many improvements were made but safety was not assured.
It was not until Discovery again flew in July of 2006 before she flew safely. That counts as the third “return to flight” mission for Discovery.
You see, we dodged a bullet in 2005. One we should have seen coming but didn’t.
.
http://waynehale.wordpress.com/2012/04/18/how-we-nearly-lost-discovery/


The lesson he draws is that you're never as smart as you think you are, even among rocket scientists.


Bob Clark
 
Very good, and sobering, stuff.

One of the comments was almost more interesting than the article:

"I seem to remember an earlier classified Pentagon mission of Atlantis that came closer than this to ending in tragedy. That was back in 1988, I believe. The crew were not allowed to down-link high res video of the damage to the wing and heat shield due to the nature of that mission. Engineers did not realize how bad the damage was until Atlantis was safely on the ground."

I assume this was one of the standard "classified DoD missions", and that showing video of the damage was a no-no as the camera might've inadvertently shown a glimpse of the payload.
 
SOC said:
Very good, and sobering, stuff.

One of the comments was almost more interesting than the article:

"I seem to remember an earlier classified Pentagon mission of Atlantis that came closer than this to ending in tragedy. That was back in 1988, I believe. The crew were not allowed to down-link high res video of the damage to the wing and heat shield due to the nature of that mission. Engineers did not realize how bad the damage was until Atlantis was safely on the ground."

I assume this was one of the standard "classified DoD missions", and that showing video of the damage was a no-no as the camera might've inadvertently shown a glimpse of the payload.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STS-27
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom