Destinus hypersonic plane

Zoo Tycoon

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
27 May 2008
Messages
1,042
Reaction score
2,002
I just don’t get this;-

This is a hypersonic hydro-lox powered endo-atmospheric transport which has just funded at stage A to 29 million $.

The CEO is Mikhail Kokorich who just 8months ago was tied into an investor fraud dispute for the last company he started Momentus, a rocket start up.


Looking at the SPAC ;-

How The Momentus SPAC Started

Stable Road Acquisition Corp., the SPAC that merged with Momentus, was formed in May 2019 with the idea to do a deal in the cannabis industry. As stated in their Prospectus, filed on 11/8/19:

“While our efforts to identify a target business may span many industries and regions worldwide, we intend to focus our search for prospects within the cannabis industry…”

The complaint was;-

“Internal company documents defined success as 100 thruster firings, each lasting at least one minute, but the thruster failed to perform even one firing of that duration, and only three of 23 produced any plasma. Momentus lost contact with the satellite three months into a six-month mission.” And “ While company executives, including Kokorich, were aware of the problems with the satellite, they did not disclose them either publicly or in discussions with Stable Road prior to their October 2020 merger announcement. ”

The claim was settled as follows;-

“ All the parties involved other than Kokorich agreed to settle the SEC’s charges. Momentus will pay a $7 million fine, while Stable Road will pay a $1 million fine and Kabot a $40,000 fine.”

So who on this planet gives the guy another 29million$ for his next company ?
 
I just don’t get this;-

This is a hypersonic hydro-lox powered endo-atmospheric transport which has just funded at stage A to 29 million $.
I especially like the statement that "the craft is far from completion".
 
It's good that they named it nearly after how they think approaching their investors.
A significant progress, indeed.
 
A russian "serial entrepreneur" - what could possibly go wrong these days...
 
why do i have this strange feeling ?
That those programs suddenly get truckload of money...
 
This is all over the aerospace news but couldn't find a thread about it.


Although the guy seems to be a fraud, so forget it. Probably not worth a thread considering the two links thereafters.



How on earth (or off it) is anyone still giving him money? Is "due diligence" not even a thing anymore? A Google search for the guy's name should send them all running.

Or is this just a money laundering scheme -- "investors" put money in, "Entrepreneurs" pretend to spend the money, and said money mysteriously ends up in bank accounts owned by other "investors."
 
Radio ctrld?! Very light model (see liftoff dynamics). The audio is even dubiously original...

But I guess every investor get to get collectibles... A printed T-shirt and a mug?
 
It’s a big model aeroplane powered by gas turbines. Nothing hydrogen or hypersonic.
Ever heard of scaled flying demonstrators?

Yeah, done a few non flying technology demonstrators myself;-My philosophy is to focus on the difficult technology itself not the fluff.

As flying models, I’ve seen a vacuum cleaner fly just for laughs. Destinus isn’t demonstrating anything, it’s not even an appropriate hypersonic aero shape, ref LE displaced bow shocks.
 
"As flying models, I’ve seen a vacuum cleaner fly just for laughs."

Famously, Snoopy + Kennel: IIRC, there were even plans in one of the model mags...
 
...
As I understand, LoFlyte was also built to fly for laughs, and ESA and ONERA aerodynamicists are clowns?

Pull up a chair and I’ll explain;-

When a vehicle travels at hypersonic speed it produces a shock wave ahead of it called a bow shock. The shock is where air in front of the vehicle is being squished by it’s forward movement and so is big rise in pressure (known as the stagnation pressure). In compliance with Charlie’s law there’s also a big rise in temperature. The concentration of heat energy depends on the feature generating it;- sharp or point features generate vast amounts of heat. The problem here is thermal management of the material at the tip becomes deeply challenging indeed, if subject to this for more than seconds to a minute or so, it becomes impossible. The problem is the inability to conduct the heat away fast enough to prevent an unacceptable temperature raise. Hence it builds and builds until the tip burns, melts or sublimes. A good example of this phenomenon can be seen on the X15 VHF mast in the attached photo (credit NASA);-

So what’s done to avoid this is the use of curved Leading Edges with quite generous radii. This moves the bow shock forwards, indeed off from the structure hence i) reducing the intensity of the pressure/temperature, ii) improving the heat flow from the hot zone and iii) allowing cooler air to flow onto the surface. The surface behind the bow shock still gets really hot to the point high temperature refractory materials such as Carbon-Carbon are required in order to survive. An example is attached together with a picture of the Space Shuttle wing leading edge to illustrate just how big the radii needs to be.

Now the ESA Onera test craft has generous curved leading edges which is consistent with addressing hypersonic kinetic heating issues. So by its appearance it can be seen as a very genuine attempt to investigate how hypersonic shapes fly at low airspeeds.

However Desintus is all sharpe edges and points. It’ll be ok up to about mach3 if made in stainless steel or Titanium but a chocolate teapot above this. Remember they’re claiming this is a demonstration of a Mach 6-10 designed by Europes leading hypersonic engineers.
 

Attachments

  • DB466DE1-3110-4869-8787-B48D37BE5BB7.jpeg
    DB466DE1-3110-4869-8787-B48D37BE5BB7.jpeg
    69.4 KB · Views: 29
  • B24F73B5-76D3-4AEA-896B-4294F101841A.jpeg
    B24F73B5-76D3-4AEA-896B-4294F101841A.jpeg
    32.7 KB · Views: 24
  • 1C1B5EC3-539C-4CC2-9E3F-AF947FA90AE5.jpeg
    1C1B5EC3-539C-4CC2-9E3F-AF947FA90AE5.jpeg
    18.5 KB · Views: 32
...
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20230425_024644_ReadEra.jpg
    Screenshot_20230425_024644_ReadEra.jpg
    706.4 KB · Views: 28
  • Screenshot_20230425_024945_ReadEra.jpg
    Screenshot_20230425_024945_ReadEra.jpg
    625.6 KB · Views: 25
  • Screenshot_20230425_025344_ReadEra.jpg
    Screenshot_20230425_025344_ReadEra.jpg
    118.6 KB · Views: 29
  • Scigliano_AIAA.pdf
    4.7 MB · Views: 2
Remember they’re claiming this is a demonstration of a Mach 6-10 designed by Europes leading hypersonic engineers.
Where they are claiming this?
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20230425_030512_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20230425_030512_Chrome.jpg
    665.8 KB · Views: 36
I just remember how sharp inlet/wing LE were on HEXAFLY WT model I saw - and Destinus aerodynamicysts (with ExoMars Schiaparelli EDM and Space Rider design experience) literally say that their design was inspired by LAPCAT/STRATOFLY/HEXAFLY aerodynamic configuration (i.e.waverider).
 

Attachments

  • hexafly-int-820x410.jpg
    hexafly-int-820x410.jpg
    42.3 KB · Views: 30
  • 4b744d7e633194b76974d1a2538e6c48.jpg
    4b744d7e633194b76974d1a2538e6c48.jpg
    111.7 KB · Views: 24
  • 73c4812079c0bf3bb2b5907530c5dbad (1).jpg
    73c4812079c0bf3bb2b5907530c5dbad (1).jpg
    140.4 KB · Views: 26
  • 7fdf8e066c79f3914cadabb7080a0ed7.jpg
    7fdf8e066c79f3914cadabb7080a0ed7.jpg
    112.7 KB · Views: 28
  • tumblr_nxdp9tbu9n1qiw9xho5_r1_1280.jpg
    tumblr_nxdp9tbu9n1qiw9xho5_r1_1280.jpg
    233.4 KB · Views: 31
  • tumblr_nxdp9tbu9n1qiw9xho7_r1_1280.jpg
    tumblr_nxdp9tbu9n1qiw9xho7_r1_1280.jpg
    200.3 KB · Views: 28
  • Screenshot_20230425_034503_ReadEra.jpg
    Screenshot_20230425_034503_ReadEra.jpg
    167.4 KB · Views: 30
Last edited:
...
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20230425_033512_ReadEra.jpg
    Screenshot_20230425_033512_ReadEra.jpg
    314.2 KB · Views: 44
  • We_programm_DLR_13eng.pdf
    5.4 MB · Views: 10
Some great progress:

3bce82bee03621d3c644af7fcda64422



Regarding post above, accute V-shaped inlets are called inward Inlets
 
Last edited:
From attached article, Destinus claims ;-

“Instead of carbon dioxide and nitrogen oxide, hydrogen emits only heat and water vapor.”

Factually incorrect, nitrogen oxide forms when air is heated above temperatures required for propulsion by whatever means. Ref https://www3.epa.gov/ttncatc1/dir1/fnoxdoc.pdf

And as for Introducing a hydrogen pipe into the exhaust of a model jet engine and claiming it’s a hydrogen afterburner….they really are exploiting widespread ignorance of what these components do.

Remember from first post in thread;-

“While company executives, including Kokorich, were aware of the problems”…. “they did not disclose them either publicly or in discussions with Stable Road prior to their October 2020 merger announcement.”
 
Last edited:

However Desintus is all sharpe edges and points. It’ll be ok up to about mach3 if made in stainless steel or Titanium but a chocolate teapot above this. Remember they’re claiming this is a demonstration of a Mach 6-10 designed by Europes leading hypersonic engineers.

As I understand it, the holy grail of materials technology in design for hypersonic flight is something that can have a sharp leading edge without being destroyed by the intense heating that would result. Indeed, even earlier designs that have sharp leading edges have wide, wedge-like noses to spread the heat with the wing leading edges well behind the shock cone - the X-43 is a prime example (unbuilt 'X-43C' shown below). The reason for this is to allow relatively easy transition though the supersonic regime to the hypersonic, and relatively efficient aerodynamics at transonic and supersonic speeds.

I think there's been a lot of research into ceramic-based materials that can allow a sharp leading edge that can be formed into aerodynamic shapes and survive hypersonic heating. There's also been talk at least of active cooling. 3-D printing or advanced milling techniques could perhaps put capillaries in panels, through which the fuel circulates before going to the engines for example, but it's bound to be expensive to perfect.

Judging by renders, Lockheed's 'SR-72' probably employs one of these. I would suppose a company with their experience and resources could manage it.

If I were a Destinus rep, I'd be boasting about how I had made one of these solutions work practically and show off test data to prove it. If in fact I'd actually seen this done of course... Right now, that's the dog that's not barking.
 

Attachments

  • x-43c_coming.jpg
    x-43c_coming.jpg
    468.7 KB · Views: 19
Last edited:

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom