Vision for the 2026 Surface Fleet

Triton

Donald McKelvy
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
9,715
Reaction score
1,053
Website
deeptowild.blogspot.com
Vision for the 2026 Surface Fleet by Commander, Naval Surface Forces, January 2014
http://www.public.navy.mil/surfor/Documents/2026Vision.pdf
 

Attachments

  • 1-4bb1415e75.jpg
    1-4bb1415e75.jpg
    215.6 KB · Views: 137

Triton

Donald McKelvy
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
9,715
Reaction score
1,053
Website
deeptowild.blogspot.com
"U.S. Navy Must Move Toward Energy Weapons, Offensive Lethality"
by Michael Fabey mike.fabey@aviationweek.com
January 12, 2014

Source:
http://www.aviationweek.com/Article.aspx?id=/article-xml/awx_01_12_2014_p0-653887.xml&p=1

The U.S. Navy surface fleet must steer away from depending on defensive missiles and must move toward becoming more offensively lethal, says the admiral in charge of those ships.

“The surface force must greatly improve its offensive lethality,” says Vice Adm. Thomas Copeman, commander of the Naval Surface Force and U.S. Pacific Naval Surface Force.

“We must move beyond the missile as a defensive system,” he says in his “Vision for the 2026 Surface Fleet” report, which was released earlier this month in advance of the Surface Navy Association Conference and Symposium being held Jan. 14-16 in Arlington, Va.

“The cost per engagement ratio vs. adversary weapons limits the capacity our nation can afford and missiles take up a lot of space, limiting the number of weapons that can be carried by ships,” Copeman says.

“Our weapons development and purchasing trajectory must rebalance in favor of energy-based weapons for defense that will affordably deliver the capability and capacity required to conduct prompt and sustained combat operations through the coming decades.”

At the same time, Copeman says, the Navy must focus more on offense. “In recent decades, our surface combatant weapon systems have become predominantly defensive,” he says.

Copeman notes the recent “sailing directions” by Adm. Jonathan Greenert, chief of naval operations, “state clearly that we must deliver ‘credible capability for deterrence, sea control and power projection,’ so our current defensive posture must change.

“The Navy will not be able to fight its way into denied environments and maintain open sea lines of communication without the Surface Force being able to take the fight to the enemy in environments where air assets are not available or are unable to effectively or persistently operate,” Copeman says.

In a world where computing power doubles every 18 months, he says, “our primary anti-surface and antisubmarine weapons today are based on technology that is far older than most of the sailors that operate them.”

Unfortunately, the acquisition system is not flexible enough to meet today’s technological realities, says Copeman.

“The system currently in place evolved to be accountable, not agile,” he says. “The success in making the acquisition accountable has come at the cost of diminishing the surface fleet’s ability to successfully conduct prompt and sustained combat operations in a rapidly evolving world.

“Weapons that could dramatically improve the lethality of the surface force are available in the near term, and, with the right support, I believe the surface Navy could quickly and significantly improve the anti-surface and antisubmarine lethality of our ships in short order, without compromising accountability, and while reducing variance within our ship classes,” Copeman says.

“All of the ships we build, from the Littoral Combat Ships, to DDG-1000, to our multi-purpose amphibious assault ships, must absolutely be built to win in major combat operations,” he says. “At the same time, we must recognize as we buy, build and plan to operate our ships that the great majority of their operations over expected service life will be in [more routine] operations.”
 

Triton

Donald McKelvy
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
9,715
Reaction score
1,053
Website
deeptowild.blogspot.com
"Building the Surface Fleet of Tomorrow"
by Rear Admiral Thomas Rowden

Source:
http://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2014-01/building-surface-fleet-tomorrow
 

Rhinocrates

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Sep 26, 2006
Messages
801
Reaction score
1,552

TomS

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2008
Messages
4,980
Reaction score
2,568
I'm pretty sure 'Arctic' will appear in every RFP and specification for everything from now on.

FFG(X) Flight II to be ice-hardened?

(Mostly kidding)
 

shin_getter

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Jun 1, 2019
Messages
617
Reaction score
678
"U.S. Navy Must Move Toward Energy Weapons, Offensive Lethality"
by Michael Fabey mike.fabey@aviationweek.com
January 12, 2014

Source:

The U.S. Navy surface fleet must steer away from depending on defensive missiles and must move toward becoming more offensively lethal, says the admiral in charge of those ships.
With the dramatic increase in firepower projection range of ground based forces to global levels with space, long range aircraft and ground launch munitions, naval offensive capability is one that is unnecessary in a lot of scenarios.

The surface ship's ability to defend maritime transport is however unparalleled. This role will continue being the most important and irreplaceable one.
 

Moose

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2010
Messages
1,564
Reaction score
694
Accommodation hulks/barges have been around forever. Old cruise ships are not always available in good condition at competitive prices.
 

Foo Fighter

I came, I saw, I drank some tea (and had a bun).
Senior Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2016
Messages
2,453
Reaction score
1,409
I understand but there has been an opportunity there for a while. Probably past that window now.
 

Rhinocrates

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Sep 26, 2006
Messages
801
Reaction score
1,552

Similar threads

Top