Vickers Valiant Mk-4 105mm

JAZZ

ACCESS: Secret
Joined
Mar 12, 2006
Messages
297
Reaction score
124
In 1976 it was annouced that the UK had developed a new armour - Chobam. Vickers as a private venture sought to take advntage and develop a tank that would use the armour and meet the needs of countries unable to operate Leopar-2, Mi and FV4030-3's.

The Valiant was completed in 1979, hull was aluminium to which Chobham armour could be added, turrret was steel, with a layer of applique Chobham on the front and sides, and fitted with a 105mm L7A3 tank gun. Rolls Royce CV12 TCA deisel developing 915bhp was used. The tank had an all up weight of 43,600kg.
 

Attachments

  • UK- Vickers Valiant Mk-4 105mm_0023.jpg
    UK- Vickers Valiant Mk-4 105mm_0023.jpg
    123.1 KB · Views: 1,442

goose

ACCESS: Restricted
Joined
Jul 14, 2010
Messages
29
Reaction score
2
Love this tank! Are there any more pictures of it out there-I can't find any on the internet.
 
C

CostasTT

Guest
Here are some I found in my computer.
 

Attachments

  • valiant_02.jpg
    valiant_02.jpg
    33 KB · Views: 864
  • valiant_03.jpg
    valiant_03.jpg
    7.2 KB · Views: 899
  • valiant_04.jpg
    valiant_04.jpg
    13.5 KB · Views: 814
  • valiant_05.JPG
    valiant_05.JPG
    191.9 KB · Views: 809
  • valiant_06.JPG
    valiant_06.JPG
    147.7 KB · Views: 785

John21

ACCESS: Confidential
Joined
May 28, 2007
Messages
148
Reaction score
3
I guess this fell through because Chobham was/is never really offered for export except for NATO or strategic partners?
 
C

CostasTT

Guest
Nice! These two photos, like the first one in my post, show the 120mm armed prototype.
 

goose

ACCESS: Restricted
Joined
Jul 14, 2010
Messages
29
Reaction score
2
Thanks a million for the pictures-I haven't see these before either. From what I have read the project failed because the hull was made from aluminium. The idea was to maximise the weight of armor that the tank could carry by minimising the hull weight. What killed the project was that the hull suffered from stress corrosion. This is surprising as Britian has experience in alloy AFVs-Scorpion series-but I surpose a 45 ton MBT is a different beast to an 8 ton light tank-sorry 'Combat Vehicle Recconasonce'!
 

goose

ACCESS: Restricted
Joined
Jul 14, 2010
Messages
29
Reaction score
2
Just a short observation, do you think that the first road wheel is too far back?
 

Jemiba

Moderator
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2006
Messages
8,348
Reaction score
1,545
goose said:
Just a short observation, do you think that the first road wheel is too far back?

You're right, I think, that it is further back, than in other tanks. But "too far" would mean, that it
would degrade performance. I think, if weight distribution allows, this arrangement can improve
the ability to overstep obstacles or trenches ?
(drawings used from http://www.mainbattletanks.czweb.org/indexeng.htm, http://dayerses.com/photos/giat-amx-30/09/,
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/m60.htm, http://www.inetres.com/gp/military/cv/tank/Leopard2.html )
 

Attachments

  • tank_comp.gif
    tank_comp.gif
    185.6 KB · Views: 270
Top