USCG Offshore Patrol Cutter (OPC)

Triton

Donald McKelvy
Senior Member
Joined
14 August 2009
Messages
9,707
Reaction score
2,049
Website
deeptowild.blogspot.com
Video of United States Coast Guard Offshore Patrol Cutter (OPC) concept by Vigor Industrial featuring an Ulstein X-bow.

http://youtu.be/gdxQjfQpuoM

Artist's impression of USCG Offshore Patrol Cutter by Vigor Industrial.

Source:
http://vigorindustrial.com/services/offshore-patrol-cutters-more
 

Attachments

  • SX151-OPC-Transit-2.jpg
    SX151-OPC-Transit-2.jpg
    90.5 KB · Views: 1,412
  • 8003938536_1f46f4b327_o.jpg
    8003938536_1f46f4b327_o.jpg
    247.5 KB · Views: 1,368
Artist's impression of VT Halter Marine/DCNS OPC concept.

VT Halter Marine, Inc. (VT Halter Marine), a subsidiary of VT Systems, Inc. (VT Systems), today announced its partnership agreement with DCNS to submit a proposal to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for the design and construction of the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) Offshore Patrol Cutter (OPC). VT Halter Marine will be the prime contractor and DCNS will be its exclusive subcontractor for the OPC platform design.

USCG stated in its Request for Proposal for the OPC released on September 25, 2012, that it anticipates to acquire as many as 25 OPCs to replace an aging fleet of 28 Medium Endurance Cutters consisting of 14 Reliance class cutters (210ft/64m) built between 1964 and 1969, 13 Famous class cutters (270ft/82m) built between 1983 and 1991, and one Alex Haley class cutter (282ft/86m) built in 1964.

Source:
http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=637
 

Attachments

  • 4h1Bo.jpg
    4h1Bo.jpg
    87.4 KB · Views: 1,270
  • 6K9ri.jpg
    6K9ri.jpg
    27 KB · Views: 1,258
"Who Will Build Next USCG Cutter?Multibillion-D ollar Program Draws U.S., EU Shipyards"
Oct. 15, 2012 - 10:30AM |
By CHRISTOPHER P. CAVAS

Source:

http://www.defensenews.com/article/20121015/DEFREG02/310150004

At least eight companies or teams are lining up to bid on the next large U.S. shipbuilding program, which aims to build 25 ships for about $8.1 billion and provide years of work.

But this isn’t a Navy ship — it’s for the U.S. Coast Guard’s Offshore Patrol Cutter (OPC), a program that could become the service’s largest-ever acquisition effort.

After working with vendors through several draft requests for proposal, the Coast Guard issued a final RfP Sept. 25. Interested parties have until Jan. 10 to submit proposals for the ship, which is needed to replace the fleet’s 29 210-foot and 270-foot medium-endurance cutters.

Falling between the large, 4,500-ton National Security Cutter (NSC) and small, 353-ton Fast Response Cutter (FRC), both now in production, the OPC, according to the Coast Guard, will “bridge the gap between the Coast Guard’s law enforcement/homeland security mission priorities and the Navy’s military defense mission priorities.”

The ship is expected to have a displacement of 3,500 to 4,000 tons, have a hangar able to house H-60 and H-65 helicopters, and a flight deck strengthened for all larger H-60 variants, up to the Sikorsky S-92. The core crew size is limited to 100 or fewer members.
Bidders Keeping Mum

A variety of U.S. shipyards are interested in the program, ranging from repair yards that have never built a warship or large cutter, to tried-and-true shipbuilders Huntington Ingalls and Bath Iron Works.

The Coast Guard program — for a service with a history of using foreign designs as the basis for its ships — could represent a rare opportunity for an international firm or a small, domestic shipbuilder to get in on a major contract. Several European shipbuilders, design houses, and sensor and systems suppliers, including French shipbuilding giant and electronics powerhouse Thales, also are teamed with U.S. shipbuilders or seeking a partner to bid on the OPC.

Most of the potential OPC bidders aren’t talking about their efforts, and those that do aren’t saying much:

• Huntington Ingalls, one of the Navy’s “big five” shipbuilders, already builds the Coast Guard’s Bertholf-class NSCs at its Ingalls yard in Pascagoula, Miss., along with Navy destroyers and amphibious ships.

“We intend to get a proposal together and submit it,” company spokeswoman Beci Brenton said. “We think we can be very competitive to provide the Coast Guard the best value.”

She declined to provide any details of the company’s bid.

• Both General Dynamics shipyards devoted to building surface ships — the third yard builds submarines — are interested in the OPC. But San Diego-based National Steel and Shipbuilding Co. and Maine’s Bath Iron Works will, according to a shipbuilding source, have a “firewall” between them on the project.

“Both yards are quite serious,” the shipbuilding source said. “They’ll both compete for it.”

Although Bath has built large destroyers and cruisers, it also was the lead yard for the Navy’s FFG 7 Oliver Hazard Perry-class frigates, ships only a bit larger than the OPC might be.

“This would be more in line with the FFG 7s back in the 1980s,” Bath spokesman Jim DeMartini acknowledged. “We’re not going to talk about any specifics in the design, but we fully intend to submit a proposal.”

• Bollinger Shipyards, with facilities in Louisiana and Mississippi, is a veteran supplier for the Coast Guard and is expected to submit a strong proposal, partnered with the Damen Shipyards Group in the Netherlands and U.S. design firm Gibbs & Cox.

“Damen did the design for the 87-foot patrol boats and the FRC,” noted Robert Socha, the company’s vice president of sales and marketing. “Why change a good thing?”

Damen Schelde, part of the group, designed and built the Holland-class offshore patrol vessels for the Dutch Navy. The first of the 3,750-ton, 355-foot-long ships is coming into service, and the design bears a family resemblance to the smaller FRC.

Rather than build the ships at the company’s yard in Lockport, La., which is hard at work on the FRC, Bollinger would probably expand its yard at Amelia, La., to build the larger OPCs, Socha said.

• Another partnership was revealed Oct. 1, when VT Halter Marine announced a teaming agreement with French shipbuilder DCNS, which built the LaFayette-class frigates for the French Navy.

“We envisage entering the American market through an agreement with an American partner, VT Halter, to make a joint offer for the OPC,” DCNS Executive Chairman Patrick Boissier said. “We’re offering a frigate hull design, derived from a design we have already built. The problem is to find a hull that meets needs expressed by the U.S. Coast Guard, which wants a vessel around 3,500 tons to 4,000 tons.”

DCNS would handle the ship design, he said, “with American systems.”

Thales is marketing its Integrated Mast, or I-Mast, to all OPC bidders. The Holland-class patrol vessels are equipped with the structure, which houses a phased-array radar, electro-optical sensors, electronic warfare systems and satellite communications gear. Thales has been demonstrating how the concept could be integrated into different designs.

• Another proposal comes from Vigor Shipyards, whose Washington state yards were purchased last year from Todd Shipyards. The Seattle shipyard has a long history as a repair facility for the Coast Guard, including the service’s two Polar icebreakers.

Vigor is offering a design based on the Norwegian Ulstein X-Bow, a unique concept that features a towering, bluff bow structure that narrows to a fine form at the waterline.

“Straight on, it’s actually a wave-piercing bow for smaller waves,” said Matt von Ruden, a retired Coast Guard captain who commanded two cutters and served on many more.

“For large waves, it has much more volume, allowing the energy of the ship to be controlled,” he said. “You get a gentle motion that’s a more gentle ride with reduced vertical and pitch acceleration.”

Von Ruden, Vigor’s OPC program manager, spent several days underway in the North Sea aboard one of the ships, several dozen of which operate in those stormy seas supporting the oil industry.

“I wanted to see whether the claims about reduced motion, less wear on the crew, high acceleration were true. They were,” he said.

After evaluating the bids, the Coast Guard is expected in June to award two or three firms with Phase I preliminary design contracts. The competition winner is scheduled to be chosen in October 2015, and awarded a contract and options to build up to 11 cutters. A follow-on competition would take place for the remaining 14 ships. Procurement of the first OPC is scheduled for 2017.

Pierre Tran contributed to this report from Paris.
 
Model of Huntington Ingalls Industries (HII) OPC concept.

HII's OPC features side-by-side funnels flanking a helicopter hangar. The shipbuilder already builds the larger National Security Cutters for the service.

Source:
http://blogs.defensenews.com/intercepts/2013/04/hii-shows-off-new-bmd-ship-concept-at-sea-air-space/
 

Attachments

  • BMD-OPC-130408-SeaAirSpace-HII-Lisa-Nova-Scotia-2012-658.jpg
    BMD-OPC-130408-SeaAirSpace-HII-Lisa-Nova-Scotia-2012-658.jpg
    152.2 KB · Views: 865
Artist's impression of Vigor Industrial OPC concept.

Source:
http://vigorindustrial.com/news-press/vigor_unveils_innovative_design_for_the_coast_guard_opc
http://www.eaglespeak.us/2013/03/arctic-maritime-security-america-needs.html
 

Attachments

  • opc-storm.jpg
    opc-storm.jpg
    63.9 KB · Views: 236
  • opc-graysea.jpg
    opc-graysea.jpg
    45.1 KB · Views: 210
Artist's impression of Bollinger Shipyards OPC concept.

Source:
http://chuckhillscgblog.net/category/shipbuilding-2/
 

Attachments

  • ProductLarge10179.jpg
    ProductLarge10179.jpg
    26.8 KB · Views: 232
USCG stated in its Request for Proposal for the OPC released on September 25, 2012, that it anticipates to acquire as many as 25 OPCs to replace an aging fleet of 28 Medium Endurance Cutters consisting of 14 Reliance class cutters (210ft/64m) built between 1964 and 1969, 13 Famous class cutters (270ft/82m) built between 1983 and 1991, and one Alex Haley class cutter (282ft/86m) built in 1964.

Source:
http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=637

Well I must say I am very envious in the seriousness that the United States Government takes the USCG! I wish the Australian Government would do the same and free up the RAN to do the principle job it was intended to do - as opposed to being subordinate to neo-politics and intercepting asylum seek boats! The size, displacement and capability of the OPC depicted is looks more like the design the RAN needs and should have instead of those jokes they call the Armidale Class Patrol Boat's!! :mad:

Regards
Pioneer
 
Model of Eastern Offshore Patrol Cutter concept at Sea Air Space 2014.

Source:
http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php/news/naval-exhibitions/sea-air-space-2014.html
 

Attachments

  • img_4135.jpg
    img_4135.jpg
    417.7 KB · Views: 169
  • img_4134.jpg
    img_4134.jpg
    428.3 KB · Views: 163
  • img_4133.jpg
    img_4133.jpg
    463.2 KB · Views: 142
  • img_4132.jpg
    img_4132.jpg
    322 KB · Views: 116
  • img_4131.jpg
    img_4131.jpg
    321.3 KB · Views: 109
  • img_4129.jpg
    img_4129.jpg
    390 KB · Views: 146
  • img_4128.jpg
    img_4128.jpg
    453.9 KB · Views: 198
Model of a USCG Offshore Patrol Cutter concept. Don't know who designed the concept.

The photo is from the model builder's site. http://www.scalereproductions.com/militarymodels.html
 

Attachments

  • Cutter.jpg
    Cutter.jpg
    38.3 KB · Views: 245

Eastern has really struggled with the contract, part due to their own issues and a lot due to Hurricane Michael coming through and flattening the yard and the community around it.

This is the last of four OPCs that Eastern actually has under contract and the Coast Guard is in the midst of recompeting the rest of the production run (ultimately 20+ ships) with other yards. I believe these would all be to the original Eastern design, however. No second look at the Vigor Ulstein X-Bow this time.
 
From late June, Austal won the contract for follow-on production of OPC. They're transitioning to doing steel hull construction and this will be, I think, their second steel contract, following a pair of Navy salvage tugs. So, good luck Coast Guard...

 
 
Last edited:
Of course they do...Old saying ," If it weren't for lawyers....we probably wouldn't need lawyers !
 
Of course they do...Old saying ," If it weren't for lawyers....we probably wouldn't need lawyers !

Sure. But in their position, wouldn't you do everything you could? They were screwed hard by Hurricane Michael, and losing OPC may well mean the end of the company and the jobs that it provides. They absolutely had problems before that, but USCG is a really painful customer sometimes, so I hesitate to lay all of OPC's earlier problems on the yard alone.
 
Of course they do...Old saying ," If it weren't for lawyers....we probably wouldn't need lawyers !

Sure. But in their position, wouldn't you do everything you could? They were screwed hard by Hurricane Michael, and losing OPC may well mean the end of the company and the jobs that it provides. They absolutely had problems before that, but USCG is a really painful customer sometimes, so I hesitate to lay all of OPC's earlier problems on the yard alone.
It’s worth noting that the shipbuilding facility in question is very rudimentary, to say the least. I don‘t see a huge amount of investment, and without speculating on the political aspects, I’m quite amazed they got the OPC contract to begin with. I haven’t seen any inordinate controversy over the OPC program, so I can only assume they done well enough? In any case, there’s tremendous labor shortage at the moment, so any skilled tradesmen will easily find work, especially in the building trades
 
That's the problem with ship building it's very easy to lose that" corporate knowledge" needed to accomplish more then a few tasks.
It reminds me of the trouble my country , Canada has had regrettably on several occasions.
And perhaps there is the the problems the British experienced in the late 30's .
While attempting to restart their naval heavy gun programme after a ten to twelve year hiatus.
 
Last edited:
Oct. 5, 2022
The Coast Guard today issued a notice to Austal USA, the offshore patrol cutter (OPC) Stage 2 contractor, to proceed on detail design work to support future production of OPCs. The Coast Guard issued the notice following the withdrawal of an award protest filed in July with the Government Accountability Office by an unsuccessful Stage 2 offeror.

The Coast Guard on June 30, 2022, awarded a fixed-price incentive (firm target) contract through a full and open competition to Austal USA to produce up to 11 offshore patrol cutters. The initial award is valued at $208.26 million and supports detail design and long lead-time material for the fifth OPC, with options for production of up to 11 OPCs in total. The contract has a potential value of up to $3.33 billion if all options are exercised.

The Coast Guard’s requirements for OPC Stage 2 detail design and production were developed to maintain commonality with earlier OPCs in critical areas such as the hull and propulsion systems, but provide flexibility to propose and implement new design elements that benefit lifecycle cost, production and operational efficiency and performance.

The 25-ship OPC program of record complements the capabilities of the service’s national security cutters, fast response cutters and polar security cutters as an essential element of the Department of Homeland Security’s layered maritime security strategy. The OPC will meet the service’s long-term need for cutters capable of deploying independently or as part of task groups and is essential to stopping smugglers at sea, interdicting undocumented non-citizens, rescuing mariners, enforcing fisheries laws, responding to disasters and protecting ports.
 
Oct. 5, 2022
The Coast Guard today issued a notice to Austal USA, the offshore patrol cutter (OPC) Stage 2 contractor, to proceed on detail design work to support future production of OPCs. The Coast Guard issued the notice following the withdrawal of an award protest filed in July with the Government Accountability Office by an unsuccessful Stage 2 offeror.

The Coast Guard on June 30, 2022, awarded a fixed-price incentive (firm target) contract through a full and open competition to Austal USA to produce up to 11 offshore patrol cutters. The initial award is valued at $208.26 million and supports detail design and long lead-time material for the fifth OPC, with options for production of up to 11 OPCs in total. The contract has a potential value of up to $3.33 billion if all options are exercised.

The Coast Guard’s requirements for OPC Stage 2 detail design and production were developed to maintain commonality with earlier OPCs in critical areas such as the hull and propulsion systems, but provide flexibility to propose and implement new design elements that benefit lifecycle cost, production and operational efficiency and performance.

The 25-ship OPC program of record complements the capabilities of the service’s national security cutters, fast response cutters and polar security cutters as an essential element of the Department of Homeland Security’s layered maritime security strategy. The OPC will meet the service’s long-term need for cutters capable of deploying independently or as part of task groups and is essential to stopping smugglers at sea, interdicting undocumented non-citizens, rescuing mariners, enforcing fisheries laws, responding to disasters and protecting ports.

Eastern is taking their protest to court.

 
So instead of letting the GAO protest run its course and either achieve a re-compete or hang in for the next round of buys, they've decided to try to derail the whole program in hopes of getting a sympathetic judge that will award them damages. Way to burn bridges with the Coasties, and the taxpayers.
 
IMHO it is the only way to obtain critical info on CG decision for follow-on legal activities. Bridge has been burned when after investment deal was given to the competition with apparently less credentials/references. You are not running in investment without solid deal-being that formal or informal…
 
So instead of letting the GAO protest run its course and either achieve a re-compete or hang in for the next round of buys, they've decided to try to derail the whole program in hopes of getting a sympathetic judge that will award them damages. Way to burn bridges with the Coasties, and the taxpayers.
You mean "lay off your entire workforce so you can't build anything anyways"?
 
I like that xbow concept. Seaworthy and yet able to be tall, allowing excellent height for a radar. Would also be visually easy to spot amidship. Helicopters could find it visually I am sure.
 
I like that xbow concept. Seaworthy and yet able to be tall, allowing excellent height for a radar. Would also be visually easy to spot amidship. Helicopters could find it visually I am sure.
And given the Coastie's mission, a wave-piercing bow is probably to their advantage. Especially if we're talking west coast and Bering Sea operations.
 
And given the Coastie's mission, a wave-piercing bow is probably to their advantage. Especially if we're talking west coast and Bering Sea operations.
How is that bow in the kind of icing conditions regularly experienced in the Bering Sea... and if the ice does stick, how do you remove it at sea (icing of the hull or superstructure & cargo is a common factor in ship sinkings).
 
How is that bow in the kind of icing conditions regularly experienced in the Bering Sea... and if the ice does stick, how do you remove it at sea (icing of the hull or superstructure & cargo is a common factor in ship sinkings).
Hydrophobic paint, like a permanent coat of Rain-X.
 
Hydrophobic paint, like a permanent coat of Rain-X.
That and the constant pounding of the waves keep it off.

Its the spray that freezes not the waves themselves. If you looks at any iced up boat you see a very obvious line were the water routinely hits which have no ice compare to the bits that don't have any such coontact thats have a layer of ice on it.
 
How is that bow in the kind of icing conditions regularly experienced in the Bering Sea... and if the ice does stick, how do you remove it at sea (icing of the hull or superstructure & cargo is a common factor in ship sinkings).

I will note that they use this hullform a fair bit for North Sea oil field support vessels, and some with ice hardening as "expedition" tourist ships in the Antarctic. So they seem to do OK in ice.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom