USAF Penetrating Electronic Attack

GeorgeA

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2006
Messages
706
Reaction score
77
Hawk Carlisle on PEA and PCA in AF Magazine daily report:

Twenty years after the Air Force gave up its EF-111 stand-in jamming platform, it is again looking to create an escort electronic warfare aircraft capability, inheriting the mission from the Navy.

Air Combat Command chief Gen. Hawk Carlisle, in a recent interview with Air Force Magazine, said the service is aiming to field a Penetrating Electronic Attack platform in the 2030-2035 timeframe.

“We believe we need not only Penetrating Counter-Air, we also believe we need Penetrating Electronic Attack,” he said of aircraft capable of getting past high-end air defense systems. The platform could be a variant of the PCA aircraft, or “we have something that can go a little faster in that realm,” or it could be an unmanned platform. “So there’s a lot we’re thinking about” with the PEA, he said.

“The Navy is kind of leaning toward a standoff capability” in electronic warfare, “because of the way the fleet operates,” Carlisle noted. “We, in the Air Force, responsible for theater-level airpower, believe we need penetrating as well and so, my guess is, there will be…a synergy there where the Navy concentrates on a standoff capability, we concentrate on a stand-in capability. And then we marry those two together to make the greatest electronic attack capability we can.”

The Navy has included the Air Force in its EA-6B Prowler and later EA-18 Growler missions since the EF-111 “Spark ‘Vark” was retired, allowing electronic warfare exchange officers to fly on those aircraft in the jamming/escort role.

Carlisle said that after a now-underway service-wide Enterprise Capability Collaboration Team review of multi-domain command and control, it will do one on electronic warfare and flesh out EA plans. The services are also working a joint look at theater electronic attack and electronic warfare launched by Deputy Defense Secretary Robert Work last year.

NB: I interpreted his comment

we have something that can go a little faster in that realm

As meaning something that could programmatically emerge earlier, rather than a faster aircraft, based on the context of the article (persistence).
 

bring_it_on

I really should change my personal text
Joined
Jul 4, 2013
Messages
2,655
Reaction score
1,006
I also read it as something that can go faster through the acquisition cycle. The P-AEA mission has been in their horizon for a while now.
 

marauder2048

"I should really just relax"
Joined
Nov 19, 2013
Messages
3,158
Reaction score
523
bring_it_on said:
I also read it as something that can go faster through the acquisition cycle. The P-AEA mission has been in their horizon for a while now.

SCO is sponsoring MALD-X for example.
 

MaverickSawyer

ACCESS: Restricted
Joined
Aug 30, 2016
Messages
12
Reaction score
7
MALD would work to an extent, but what about something a little larger, like the UTAP-22?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lcP66syzQls
 

RetiredAFGuy

20 years of Phantom Phun
Joined
Jan 10, 2019
Messages
16
Reaction score
22
Another task for NGAD's family of drones to handle as a hunter killer team with the manned NGAD aircraft acting as mission director?
 

jsport

what do you know about surfing Major? you're from-
Joined
Jul 27, 2011
Messages
3,707
Reaction score
1,424

FighterJock

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Oct 29, 2007
Messages
2,058
Reaction score
904

Similar threads

Top