Unindefied VFX(?) from NASA's Glenn Research Center site

flateric

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
9,305
Reaction score
1,886
At least looks very VFX-sky
 

Attachments

  • 1974_00652L.jpg
    1974_00652L.jpg
    17.5 KB · Views: 699

Orionblamblam

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2006
Messages
8,978
Reaction score
3,511
Website
www.aerospaceprojectsreview.com
flateric said:
At least looks very VFX-sky

Given the seriously badass nature of the engine, the study this was related to might not have been a fighter study, but an engine study. The exhaust setup looks a lot like a Marquardt supercharged ejector ramjet (SERJ); a number of notional ideas were tossed around for aircraft powered by these engines, this might be one.
 

flateric

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
9,305
Reaction score
1,886
Bird I must say looks very un-proportional...and that bloody engine nozzle as well...
 

Robert Hilton

ACCESS: Restricted
Joined
May 13, 2007
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Orionblamblam said:
flateric said:
At least looks very VFX-sky

Given the seriously badass nature of the engine, the study this was related to might not have been a fighter study, but an engine study. The exhaust setup looks a lot like a Marquardt supercharged ejector ramjet (SERJ); a number of notional ideas were tossed around for aircraft powered by these engines, this might be one.
With a variable ejector nozzle?
 

Matej

Multiuniversal creator
Joined
Feb 13, 2006
Messages
2,610
Reaction score
212
Website
www.hitechweb.genezis.eu
I have the similar picture labeled as McDonnell Douglas VFX proposal, but I am not 100% sure about that.
 

Attachments

  • MDD_VFX.jpg
    MDD_VFX.jpg
    17.7 KB · Views: 383

frank

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
May 20, 2006
Messages
617
Reaction score
22
That thing makes me think of a scaled-down, single seat, single (big) engine, F-111. Or an 'Americanized' MiG-23!
 

starviking

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2006
Messages
1,276
Reaction score
450
Matej said:
I have the similar picture labeled as McDonnell Douglas VFX proposal, but I am not 100% sure about that.

From a cursory look all the details seem to match, cockpit style, wing/inlet relationship, wing angle + trailing edge, tail surfaces...if it isn't the McDD VFX proposal it's a clone.

BTW - from the extreme sweep - it should be a VG wing - but I can't see the wing gloves or pivot point...artistic licence?

Starviking
 

Matej

Multiuniversal creator
Joined
Feb 13, 2006
Messages
2,610
Reaction score
212
Website
www.hitechweb.genezis.eu
starviking said:
BTW - from the extreme sweep - it should be a VG wing - but I can't see the wing gloves or pivot point...artistic licence?

Probably yes, but at least I can see a low visible beginning of the wing. I highlighted it with red colour.
 

Attachments

  • MDD_VFX2.jpg
    MDD_VFX2.jpg
    18.4 KB · Views: 322

flateric

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
9,305
Reaction score
1,886
For me they are the same aircrafts. So, thanks God, another good artist's rendering of MacAir VFX found.
 

Matej

Multiuniversal creator
Joined
Feb 13, 2006
Messages
2,610
Reaction score
212
Website
www.hitechweb.genezis.eu
To clear the thing - I am absolutely sure that on both pictures is the same plane, but I am not so sure, if it is really MDD and if it is really VFX proposal.
 

Skybolt

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2006
Messages
2,295
Reaction score
214
Sorry for being so late... but the art depicts a single seat airplane, so not VFX. As for the similarity with the TFX, my gut feeling is that this is the McAir submission to the VAX competiton: both Boeing and GD are known to have submitted scaled down, single seat, single engine version of thei TFX submission.
 

lark

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2006
Messages
1,811
Reaction score
122
In "US Jet fighters since 1945" by Robert F.Dorr
Blandford Press -London- 1988

the black and white illustration is captioned as the
McDonnell entry in the US Navy VFX competition...
 

TinWing

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2006
Messages
896
Reaction score
117
Skybolt said:
Yep, Paul, but looking at the 3-view, either the painter had sight problems or the author is wrong .. ::)

3-view? What 3-view?
 

overscan (PaulMM)

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 27, 2005
Messages
13,696
Reaction score
8,023
There's a 3 view of McDonnell-Douglas' VFX submission - its the one with the canards and VG wings.

I think this is a different project entirely.
 

TinWing

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2006
Messages
896
Reaction score
117
overscan said:
There's a 3 view of McDonnell-Douglas' VFX submission - its the one with the canards and VG wings.

I think this is a different project entirely.

I would agree.

I don't even think that the drawings in question depict a TF-30 or F401 powered project, but something built around an even larger diameter turbofan of some sort?

Of course, the proportions might just be off.
 

Skybolt

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2006
Messages
2,295
Reaction score
214
If you scale down a TFX by 50 % (actually less, I'd say 30 per cent) probably everything will look larger .. ;D
 

Skybolt

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2006
Messages
2,295
Reaction score
214
And I think that 1974 is the date of publication/release... the VAX was from 1963.
 

flateric

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
9,305
Reaction score
1,886
I think artist wasnt' an idiot - just look at the glowing nozzle of the thing. Turboramjet?
 

Similar threads

Top