Tupolev Tu-344

Grey Havoc

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2009
Messages
16,998
Reaction score
6,625
Just checking something, Triton. This proposal is from 2002 1999 or there abouts, correct?
 

hesham

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
28,540
Reaction score
6,266
And a 3-view, Авиация и космонавтика 2008-12
 

Attachments

  • 344.png
    344.png
    347.7 KB · Views: 521

Grey Havoc

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2009
Messages
16,998
Reaction score
6,625
According to The Bushranger over at HP&CA there were three variants, the Tu-344A with 10 seats, the Tu-344B (shown in hesham's 3-view above) would have had 24 seats, & the Tu-344C would have had 12 seats and long-range fuel tanks.
 

Wyvern

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2020
Messages
918
Reaction score
1,205
How extensive were the modifications needed to convert the Tu-22M into the Tu-344? The fuselage seems to have a bulge in order to hold the passenger cabin. Who would have operated it? Would it have been used like the MiG-25 Business jet, to transport the Soviet Union's top brass over long distances, quickly, or would it have been used in mainline passenger service? The former seems most likely to me, as it carries to few seats to make it economical in passenger service unless the tickets were wildly expensive.

Also, would there have been any problems with the sonic boom?
 
Last edited:

blackkite

Don't laugh, don't cry, don't even curse, but.....
Joined
May 31, 2007
Messages
8,081
Reaction score
4,272
Hi!
http://www.hitechweb.genezis.eu/transport2b.htm
"In the late 1990s, Tupolev introduced a new Tu-344 project aimed at rebuilding the Tu-22M-3 military bomber with a commercial supersonic aircraft. There was room for 10 to 12 passengers in the modified hull. According to the assumptions, the variable geometry used should have brought a higher range and greater efficiency compared to classically shaped aircraft. However, in the current circumstances, the return on investment in such a project is more than debatable."
 

Attachments

  • image010.jpg
    image010.jpg
    73.3 KB · Views: 86
Last edited:

Similar threads

Top