• Hi Guest! Forum rules have been updated. All users please read here.

Scaled Composites Model 401

XP67_Moonbat

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Joined
Jan 16, 2008
Messages
2,154
Reaction score
16
http://www.scaled.com/images/uploads/news/Scaled_Completes_First_Flight_of_Experimental_Aircraft_20171011.pdf
 

XP67_Moonbat

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Joined
Jan 16, 2008
Messages
2,154
Reaction score
16
http://www.aviationpros.com/press_release/12373947/scaled-completes-first-flight-of-experimental-aircraft
 

AeroFranz

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
May 4, 2008
Messages
2,166
Reaction score
30
Neat. I hope we find out what the application is. I don't think you invest IRAD money unless you think there's a need for this. Was it maybe a demonstrator for something black? The fact that it's got a cockpit doesn't mean it wasn't supposed to be unmanned or optionally piloted (see Firebird).
 

marauder2048

"I should really just relax"
Joined
Nov 19, 2013
Messages
2,332
Reaction score
79
Maybe a customer who doesn't want to pay General Atomics' asking price for Avenger.
 

fightingirish

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2006
Messages
2,173
Reaction score
194
Video:
https://dq0mmww6n9gqf.cloudfront.net/mco/2017/10/11/59de8564e4b0cf92c3b07f52/59de8573e4b0bdc8d4556b42_t_1507755385987_mobile.m3u8
Source:
https://www.defensenews.com/air/2017/10/11/scaled-composites-reveals-mysterious-new-model-401-prototype/
 

XP67_Moonbat

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Joined
Jan 16, 2008
Messages
2,154
Reaction score
16
Makes me wonder if there's a line of research tying the 401 and General Atomic's MQ-25 bid.
 

bobbymike

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Joined
Apr 21, 2009
Messages
9,289
Reaction score
352
Would you test a sub scale wing of the B-21?
 

kcran567

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Joined
Aug 15, 2009
Messages
664
Reaction score
4
Would make a good "Red Air" threat simulator to work alongside the older Aggressors too?
 

sferrin

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2011
Messages
12,446
Reaction score
529
MQ-25 subscale demonstrator maybe? ???
 

NeilChapman

Interested 3rd party
Joined
Dec 14, 2015
Messages
928
Reaction score
19
It's more likely that they're building two low cost platforms for Flight Research, their neighbor. They do government contracted services.
 

Flyaway

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Joined
Jan 21, 2015
Messages
2,675
Reaction score
505
Scaled Composites @ScaledC
Scaled is proud to say that today was the first flight of our newest experimental aircraft, Model 401! #firsts (link: http://bit.ly/M401FF) bit.ly/M401F

Press release on link above.

https://mobile.twitter.com/ScaledC/status/918185829951987712
 

Airplane

CLEARANCE: Secret
Joined
Oct 3, 2015
Messages
432
Reaction score
1
Ahhhh.... No. I would imaging that those windmills on the ground are closer to the B-21 than the demonstrator in the pic.
 

bobbymike

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Joined
Apr 21, 2009
Messages
9,289
Reaction score
352
Airplane said:
Ahhhh.... No. I would imaging that those windmills on the ground are closer to the B-21 than the demonstrator in the pic.
Not talking about the whole aircraft obviously, so you would never test different wing planforms or configurations?
 

TomS

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2008
Messages
3,326
Reaction score
193
It's hard to tell, but in the video, it looks like the wingtips are slightly drooped?
 

Orionblamblam

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2006
Messages
7,460
Reaction score
357
Website
www.aerospaceprojectsreview.com
Well, *finally.* Quiet Bird was born in the early sixties, but took more than fifty years to fly. Looks like it's aging slowly... right now it's in that gangly awkward early teenager stage. Soon it'll break out in sensor blisters...
 

flateric

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
8,831
Reaction score
315
bobbymike said:
bobbymike said:
Would you test a sub scale wing of the B-21?
Understanding one is an artist's rendering but are the wings similar? Hiding testing in plain site?
Raider has diffirent LE sweep to start with. About 40'.
 

Airplane

CLEARANCE: Secret
Joined
Oct 3, 2015
Messages
432
Reaction score
1
If there was a need to get a subscale model of the Raider some 'air time' I imagine this would be the easiest and cheapest method....

 

bobbymike

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Joined
Apr 21, 2009
Messages
9,289
Reaction score
352
flateric said:
bobbymike said:
bobbymike said:
Would you test a sub scale wing of the B-21?
Understanding one is an artist's rendering but are the wings similar? Hiding testing in plain site?
Raider has diffirent LE sweep to start with. About 40'.
Thanks flateric appreciate the response.
 

sublight is back

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2012
Messages
743
Reaction score
11
Orionblamblam said:
Well, *finally.* Quiet Bird was born in the early sixties, but took more than fifty years to fly. Looks like it's aging slowly... right now it's in that gangly awkward early teenager stage. Soon it'll break out in sensor blisters...
And still Boeing maintains that they've "lost" all the records on quiet bird.....
 

flateric

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
8,831
Reaction score
315
Airplane said:
If there was a need to get a subscale model of the Raider some 'air time' I imagine this would be the easiest and cheapest method....

O'RLY?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=PyugEAF3CCk
 

Airplane

CLEARANCE: Secret
Joined
Oct 3, 2015
Messages
432
Reaction score
1
This isn't a Raider thread, but I am sure all the subscale modeling and wind tunnel testing and prototyping and demonstrator testing is loooong since done at this point. Likely the outer mold line has been settled and they are turning that into a manufacturable set of components/drawings and doing the hum drum boring stuff of tolerance stacks, and design for service, manufacturability, and etc etc....
 

flateric

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
8,831
Reaction score
315
Airplane said:
Likely the outer mold line has been settled and they are turning that into a manufacturable set of components/drawings
It has been for a while.
“Our biggest activity right now is putting out drawings to build the bomber,” Walden said, the airplane having passed its first major milestone—Preliminary Design Review. The next task is to “get on with the first builds of the structure.”
 

GTX

All hail the God of Frustration!!!
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2006
Messages
2,707
Reaction score
64
Website
beyondthesprues.com
marauder2048 said:
Maybe a customer who doesn't want to pay General Atomics' asking price for Avenger.
It does look like a manned version of a Avenger doesn't it:

 

cluttonfred

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2008
Messages
1,325
Reaction score
18
Website
cluttonfred.info
Maybe a proof of concept for a low cost, somewhat stealthy alternative to the Textron AirLand Scorpion?
 

AeroFranz

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
May 4, 2008
Messages
2,166
Reaction score
30
Not a bad idea, in principle. I don't see much internal bay volume on this vehicle, though...and it would make no sense to hang things externally. Definitely screams test article/demonstrator to me - but for what? is it just the structures, as they claimed?

I wonder of the presence of dihedral is to get acceptable flying qualities, which would point at the lack of FBW. Not unrealistic in a low cost demonstrator.
 

TomcatViP

Hellcat
Joined
Feb 12, 2017
Messages
1,096
Reaction score
105
great idea, if so.

Dihedral: the engine seat on the top -> CG is higher -> lateral stability is lessened -> exacerbated dihedral increases the margin of stability for cheap.

Alternatively, with a lower altitude of flight (30k ft) the aspect ratio is increased, what "could" benefits the RCS (test?) given the refined shape of the wing planform.

But given the habit of SC to tune everything aerodynamically at the extreme, it could well be only in order to have the wing whashout acting better on the V-Tail at cruise level (lifting tail -> less trim drag -> less drag).

Obviously, the real motive could be none of that or to force bloggers to waste some extra watt of energy. ::)
 

XP67_Moonbat

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Joined
Jan 16, 2008
Messages
2,154
Reaction score
16
Perhaps it's demonstrating tech for a possible U-2 replacement.
 

AeroFranz

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
May 4, 2008
Messages
2,166
Reaction score
30
Maybe. One thing to keep in mind is that this vehicle doesn't necessarily have to be at representative scale. Depending on what you are trying to demonstrate, you can retire a lot of the risks doing something as small as half scale.
The more i think about it, the more a structures demonstrator (which is what they said) makes sense. It would justify not having a weapons bay or FBW.
 

Sundog

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2006
Messages
2,653
Reaction score
82
Don't forget, BoP was a a low cost structures stealthy demonstrator. It didn't represent a production configuration, but lead to the X-45.
 

litzj

BLOG : http://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/
Joined
Feb 4, 2012
Messages
228
Reaction score
9
Website
jaesan-aero.blogspot.com
it reminds me Tacit Blue of Northrop

stealthy and lomg endurance

probably for stealth tanker or reconaisance
 

Airplane

CLEARANCE: Secret
Joined
Oct 3, 2015
Messages
432
Reaction score
1
litzj said:
it reminds me Tacit Blue of Northrop

stealthy and lomg endurance

probably for stealth tanker or reconaisance
The 401 is anything but stealthy. LO is in the details and details are not stealthy.
 

flateric

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
8,831
Reaction score
315
Are you Dr.Cashen?
 

litzj

BLOG : http://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/
Joined
Feb 4, 2012
Messages
228
Reaction score
9
Website
jaesan-aero.blogspot.com
Airplane said:
litzj said:
it reminds me Tacit Blue of Northrop

stealthy and lomg endurance

probably for stealth tanker or reconaisance
The 401 is anything but stealthy. LO is in the details and details are not stealthy.

basically u are right, but this prototype aircraft has potential to be stealthy

it seems like small demonstration for bigger real one

if it will not pursue stealth, there is no need for that complex layout
 
Top