Russian ten year weapon procurement plan

bobbymike

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2009
Messages
11,567
Reaction score
3,257
MILPLEX
Moscow (AFP) Feb 24, 2011

Russia launched a $650 billion rearmament plan Thursday to counter the West's military dominance by adding eight nuclear submarines and hundreds of warplanes to its creaking armed forces. Details of the long-flagged Kremlin procurement plan through 2020 see Russia acquiring a total of 20 submarines and more than 600 warplanes in place of a outdated fleet of jets and vessels that have been losing international clients. Analysts said the ambitious plan would in effect create a brand new Russian armed forces that finally cut links with its Soviet past. "Russia is so unprepared for conventional warfare that its nuclear threshold is quite low -- and the chances of it using nuclear weapons quite high," said military affairs columnist Pavel Felgenhauer. "This lowers the threat of nuclear war breaking out."

The programme revealed by Deputy Defence Minister Vladimir Popovkin sees Russia building 100 new ships and acquiring 1,000 helicopters -- figures that would dramatically swell the number of modern and battle-ready craft. "The main task is the modernisation of our armed forces. Nineteen trillion rubles ($653 billion) will be allocated for this," news agencies quoted Popovkin as saying.

The Kremlin has vowed repeatedly to boost spending on a dilapidated military whose 2009 exercises were scoffed at by the United States' mission to NATO in cables published by the WikiLeaks website. A US official said the war games showed that Russia was only capable of engaging in a small to mid-sized local conflict that did not require the engagement of more than one branch of the armed forces. The assessment added that Russia "continues to rely on aging and obsolete equipment" and further suffers from a "manpower shortage". A Moscow newspaper reported in September that another in a series of poor army drafts brought the armed forces' total number to about 800,000 troops -- well short of the million-man army foreseen in planning. The Kremlin has spent recent years trying to devise a military strategy that targets spending on high-profile weapons that enable Russia to compete with the West both on the battle field and the open arms market. The strategy announced Thursday sees Russia funnelling much of its resources on nuclear submarines and next-generation anti-missiles defences to replace the already-popular S-300 system that has been sought by nations such as Iran. It envisions the nuclear submarines equipped with a new generation of ballistic missiles and supported by highly manoeuvrable frigates and other small destroyers. Yet Russia's strategy of regaining naval parity with the United States was hurt by confirmation that the military did not earmark any spending on new aircraft carriers.

That will leave Russia with just one carrier for the coming decade compared to the 11 in operations and six kept in reserve by the United States. The air force also appears to be delaying plans to launch its next generation of strategic bombers -- a project that has been advertised through the media for much of the past decade. Analysts said the plan was many years overdue. "Only about 10 percent of Russia's armed forces may be really be described as modern," said independent military analyst Alexander Golts. But he added that the plan threatened to get bogged in Russia's layered military industrial complex -- a Communist-era system that involves dozens of opaque state enterprises with murky spending practices. "Without a radical reorganisation of our defence industry, this money will just go to waste," said Golts.
 

Grey Havoc

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2009
Messages
17,454
Reaction score
7,194
Via Naval Technology:


Russia Unveils New Missile Frigate

06 April 2011


The Russian republic of Tatarstan Shipbuilders has unveiled a second Gepard Class frigate, the Dagestan, for the Russian Navy, Zelenodolsk Shipyard has said.

The 102m-long Dagestan has a displacement capacity of 2,000t and can carry a crew of 103 at a cruising speed of 23kt.

The frigate is armed with the Uran-E anti-ship missile system, a 76.2mm gun mount AK-176M, a Palma air defence artillery system, two 30mm gun mounts AK-630M, and 533mm torpedo tubes.

A Gepard Class frigate can carry a Ka-28 or a Ka-31 Helix naval helicopter and is designed to attack surface ships, submarines and air targets as well as perform escort and patrol tasks.

The frigate is expected to join the Caspian Flotilla in 2011 after undergoing a series of sea trials, according to RIA Novosti.

The first frigate, the Tatarstan, has been serving the Russian Navy as the flagship of the Caspian Flotilla since 2002.


http://www.naval-technology.com/news/news115248.html
 

jsport

what do you know about surfing Major? you're from-
Joined
Jul 27, 2011
Messages
4,318
Reaction score
1,915
MILPLEX
Moscow (AFP) Feb 24, 2011

Russia launched a $650 billion rearmament plan Thursday to counter the West's military dominance by adding eight nuclear submarines and hundreds of warplanes to its creaking armed forces. Details of the long-flagged Kremlin procurement plan through 2020 see Russia acquiring a total of 20 submarines and more than 600 warplanes in place of a outdated fleet of jets and vessels that have been losing international clients. Analysts said the ambitious plan would in effect create a brand new Russian armed forces that finally cut links with its Soviet past. "Russia is so unprepared for conventional warfare that its nuclear threshold is quite low -- and the chances of it using nuclear weapons quite high," said military affairs columnist Pavel Felgenhauer. "This lowers the threat of nuclear war breaking out."

The programme revealed by Deputy Defence Minister Vladimir Popovkin sees Russia building 100 new ships and acquiring 1,000 helicopters -- figures that would dramatically swell the number of modern and battle-ready craft. "The main task is the modernisation of our armed forces. Nineteen trillion rubles ($653 billion) will be allocated for this," news agencies quoted Popovkin as saying.

The Kremlin has vowed repeatedly to boost spending on a dilapidated military whose 2009 exercises were scoffed at by the United States' mission to NATO in cables published by the WikiLeaks website. A US official said the war games showed that Russia was only capable of engaging in a small to mid-sized local conflict that did not require the engagement of more than one branch of the armed forces. The assessment added that Russia "continues to rely on aging and obsolete equipment" and further suffers from a "manpower shortage". A Moscow newspaper reported in September that another in a series of poor army drafts brought the armed forces' total number to about 800,000 troops -- well short of the million-man army foreseen in planning. The Kremlin has spent recent years trying to devise a military strategy that targets spending on high-profile weapons that enable Russia to compete with the West both on the battle field and the open arms market. The strategy announced Thursday sees Russia funnelling much of its resources on nuclear submarines and next-generation anti-missiles defences to replace the already-popular S-300 system that has been sought by nations such as Iran. It envisions the nuclear submarines equipped with a new generation of ballistic missiles and supported by highly manoeuvrable frigates and other small destroyers. Yet Russia's strategy of regaining naval parity with the United States was hurt by confirmation that the military did not earmark any spending on new aircraft carriers.

That will leave Russia with just one carrier for the coming decade compared to the 11 in operations and six kept in reserve by the United States. The air force also appears to be delaying plans to launch its next generation of strategic bombers -- a project that has been advertised through the media for much of the past decade. Analysts said the plan was many years overdue. "Only about 10 percent of Russia's armed forces may be really be described as modern," said independent military analyst Alexander Golts. But he added that the plan threatened to get bogged in Russia's layered military industrial complex -- a Communist-era system that involves dozens of opaque state enterprises with murky spending practices. "Without a radical reorganisation of our defence industry, this money will just go to waste," said Golts.
 

Grey Havoc

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2009
Messages
17,454
Reaction score
7,194

GARGEAN

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
May 7, 2018
Messages
774
Reaction score
563
Ah, falling apart for 20 years in a row. Became classic already.
 

Ahriman

ACCESS: Restricted
Joined
Dec 20, 2021
Messages
8
Reaction score
9
Russia, at the moment, needs this "suitcase without a handle"? I mean Ukraine.
IMO, it is more important what it doesn't need: first strike weapons and NATO infrastructure deployed on Ukranian soil. From that POW preemptive war might make sense.
Regardless, I can't see what Ukraine has to do with Russian rearmament programm, excluding some authors make-believe doom preaching
 

dan_inbox

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2006
Messages
1,101
Reaction score
745
It is surprising that Russsian losses by abandoning tanks and APCs are as high or higher than by destruction.
This is as bad as the performance of Arab armies in past MEA wars.
It points out either to cowardice (which would be new for Russians), or more likely to lack of motivation and morale.
Which in turn points out to very incompetent leadership at all levels.

If so, it bodes ill for their outlook in this war: incompetent leadership cannot be fixed in a few weeks. The top man can be replaced with a coup, but fixing sargeants, lieutenants and captains takes a lot of time.
 

jsport

what do you know about surfing Major? you're from-
Joined
Jul 27, 2011
Messages
4,318
Reaction score
1,915
Top