Self-proclaimed sceptics of the "mainstream" are often the most gullible.Arjen said:It would be nice if the people critical of 'established' history would exercise their critical faculties on their own sources.
A 'result' of his car crash in 2010 ?flateric said:The most sorrow, some cosmonauts go into that shit as well
Ahhhhhhh !!!!!Michel Van said:yep he was mocking the journalist
but in 2019 The Autonomous Landing and Navigation Module (ALINA) will land near the Apollo 17 landing site and deploy two Audi Lunar Quattro rovers.
in other words the Germans will check whether US moon landings really happened...
Sorry Harro, what I meant was anyone who has one in orbit. I'm sure the Soviets would have pointed it out a very long time ago with the proof, anything to embarrass NASA ----Hobbes said:No telescope on Earth today is large enough to do that (you need about 25 m of aperture to have enough resolution to see the landers).
Are you referring to this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_Side_of_the_Moon_(film)?kcran567 said:It seems like the Russians would have been able to know if it was faked or not.
Still the people who claim it was all a hoax make some interesting points. Stanley Kubrick being
Involved in staging and filming a fake
A myth. Kubrick, as is well known, hated travel. He sent his assistants to comprehensively map and document the moon and built a full-size replica of the entire moon in the studio. Likewise Florida.AndrewN said:Stanley Kubrick was an absolute perfectionist and he insisted on filming on location... ;D
martinbayer said:I wonder whether the mention of an air disaster with over 2300 victims might have been motivated by Kubrick's documented fear/aversion of flying, especially since it purportedly occurred en route between his two places of residence of New York and London...