Clearly the air flow in the case of the Tank's Pulqui-II, goes to the sides of the cabin and not below it, with better aerodynamics.Aardvark said:Very interesting work!
It seems to me to eat questions on a combination of the channel of an air inlet and a cabin, feet of the pilot couldn't is in an air stream, whether not so?
Whether saw you these photos
http://www.mincyt.cba.gov.ar/site/fabricamilitar/images/fotos/foto231z.jpg
http://www.mincyt.cba.gov.ar/site/fabricamilitar/images/fotos/foto230z.jpg
here:
http://www.mincyt.cba.gov.ar/site/fabricamilitar/fotos/fotos009.html
Judging by a photo the nasal part has slightly other rivets of a line!
According to the panel lines can be others?
You couldn't compare Pulki II with Lavochkin La-168 and Lavochkin La-176?
http://www.aviastar.org/air/russia/la-168.php
http://www.aviastar.org/air/russia/la-176.php
There is something the general, whether a lie?
B.R. Serge
Hammer Birchgrove said:While I doubt Sweden (under a Social Democratic government) would sell SAAB J-29 Tunnan (or any other military aircraft) to Franco's Spain, it would probably gladly sell to India, which didn't happen.
Were the aerodynamic and the other possible issues with the Palqui II going to be solved?
This is true.MC72 said:Hammer Birchgrove said:While I doubt Sweden (under a Social Democratic government) would sell SAAB J-29 Tunnan (or any other military aircraft) to Franco's Spain, it would probably gladly sell to India, which didn't happen.
Were the aerodynamic and the other possible issues with the Palqui II going to be solved?
Sweden makes good airplanes! But its policy of extrict neutrality, preclude the sale of this aircraft...........a country like France more "open-minded" would have done great business with this same model.....No doubts!!
However there is a exception, the Tunnan was sold to the then "neutral" Austria, and even participates to the UN-forces for the secessionist conflict in the Congolese province of Katanga.
MC72 said:Hammer Birchgrove said:While I doubt Sweden (under a Social Democratic government) would sell SAAB J-29 Tunnan (or any other military aircraft) to Franco's Spain, it would probably gladly sell to India, which didn't happen.
Were the aerodynamic and the other possible issues with the Palqui II going to be solved?
Sweden makes good airplanes! But its policy of extrict neutrality, preclude the sale of this aircraft...........a country like France more "open-minded" would have done great business with this same model.....No doubts!!
However there is a exception, the Tunnan was sold to the then "neutral" Austria, and even participates to the UN-forces for the secessionist conflict in the Congolese province of Katanga.
MC72 said:There were no shortage of potentials Buyers outside the major alliances (USA-CCCP); The Spain of General Franco (friend of Argentina) needed replacements for their old fighters; There were some who need to begins to shoot right away, like the Arab countries or........... the explosive Indian sub-continent, of the time.
These could have been possible colors of the "Export" Pulqui-II.
The IA-33 Pulqui II, a swept-wing jet fighter designed by German engineer Kurt Tank, has been plagued with bad fortune, with the successive crash of two prototypes. Flight testing has recently resumed and has been described as especially satisfactory both in terms of maneuverability and speed — the speed of sound being attained in a dive. It is now likely that this aircraft will be produced. The United States are reportedly willing to acquire a Pulqui II in order to test it.
Motocar said:I have the cutaway drawing Pulqui II