• Hi Guest! Forum rules have been updated. All users please read here.

Project 955 Borey

flateric

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
9,047
Reaction score
874
Recently allowed for publication pics of first of Project 955 sub, Yuri Dolgorukiy, christening event published at web-log of Sergey Kuznetzov, presenter of Smotr military TV-show at Russian NTV channel.

http://pilot.strizhi.info/2007/04/17/3111#more-3111 - what everyone saw (sub's curtained tail)
http://pilot.strizhi.info/2007/05/04/3373#more-3373 - what not everyone was allowed to see (other parts of sub)
http://pilot.strizhi.info/2006/10/25/1105#more-1105 - 955 factory model at Sevmash

I advise you to visit his weblog quite often for really cool stuff.
 

flateric

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
9,047
Reaction score
874
Borey Ahoi! Yuri Dolgoruky starts sea trials on June 19, 2009

posted by 'CrazyMk' at www.forums.airbase.ru
 

Attachments

  • P1000200.JPG.jpg
    P1000200.JPG.jpg
    118.5 KB · Views: 199
  • P1000208.JPG.jpg
    P1000208.JPG.jpg
    122.7 KB · Views: 252
  • P1000211.JPG.jpg
    P1000211.JPG.jpg
    99.7 KB · Views: 164

Pioneer

Seek out and close with the enemy
Senior Member
Joined
May 22, 2006
Messages
1,838
Reaction score
197
She looks a very clean design.
The Russians have come a long way!

Regards
Pioneer
 

flateric

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
9,047
Reaction score
874
of course, some fishmen are slapping around

via CrazyMk
 

Attachments

  • cc70ee1b34ca.jpg
    cc70ee1b34ca.jpg
    93.7 KB · Views: 133

sferrin

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2011
Messages
13,393
Reaction score
1,438
Why are Russian subs always so interesting looking and US subs are tubes with fins? :'(
 

flateric

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
9,047
Reaction score
874
because Tridents are so much smaller than Sinevas...
 

aeroengineer1

ACCESS: Confidential
Joined
Jan 27, 2008
Messages
84
Reaction score
10
The reason for the difference in looks is that the US subs are a single hull construction. With this methodology, the outside of the hull is the pressure hull (except for the tapered portions of the bow and stern). Russian subs tend to be a double hull, basically a pressure hull with a fairing on it. This allows them to have slightly more streamlined shapes at higher manufacturing and materials costs. The slight gain in hydrodynamics has not been worth the extra cost for the US subs. In fact if you look at the current Russian boats, they too are moving towards the US design.

Adam
 

sferrin

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2011
Messages
13,393
Reaction score
1,438
aeroengineer1 said:
The reason for the difference in looks is that the US subs are a single hull construction. With this methodology, the outside of the hull is the pressure hull (except for the tapered portions of the bow and stern). Russian subs tend to be a double hull, basically a pressure hull with a fairing on it. This allows them to have slightly more streamlined shapes at higher manufacturing and materials costs. The slight gain in hydrodynamics has not been worth the extra cost for the US subs. In fact if you look at the current Russian boats, they too are moving towards the US design.

Adam

I know the technical reasons. It was a rhetorical question. Sorry. ;)
 

robunos

You're Mad, You Are.....
Senior Member
Joined
May 1, 2007
Messages
1,896
Reaction score
233
I know the technical reasons.

Now that was something I _didn't_ know, so that was useful to me, :)

cheers,
Robin.
 

flateric

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
9,047
Reaction score
874
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OaV8vUPhUng
 

flateric

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
9,047
Reaction score
874
via www.forums.airbase.ru
now 16 launch tubes confirmed for YD
 

Attachments

  • big-thumb-266_d859.jpg
    big-thumb-266_d859.jpg
    24.2 KB · Views: 175
  • ?0001.JPG
    ?0001.JPG
    490.3 KB · Views: 91

Austin

ACCESS: Confidential
Joined
Jan 30, 2006
Messages
194
Reaction score
3
flateric any information on that interesting shape sail on Borei ?

Thanks
 

flateric

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
9,047
Reaction score
874
...
 

Attachments

  • 955-8.jpg
    955-8.jpg
    49.4 KB · Views: 44
  • 955-4.jpg
    955-4.jpg
    52 KB · Views: 46
  • 955-3.jpg
    955-3.jpg
    50.5 KB · Views: 41
  • 955-2.jpg
    955-2.jpg
    60.3 KB · Views: 60
  • 955-1.jpg
    955-1.jpg
    40.6 KB · Views: 58

flateric

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
9,047
Reaction score
874
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tsYzh0o42OY
 

flateric

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
9,047
Reaction score
874
from www.forums.airbase.ru
 

Attachments

  • ??.jpg
    ??.jpg
    82.2 KB · Views: 122

aeroengineer1

ACCESS: Confidential
Joined
Jan 27, 2008
Messages
84
Reaction score
10
http://en.rian.ru/mlitary_news/20090716/155543654.html

This is a link to a Russian news story about the recent test of the new missile to be deployed on the 955 "class" and its failure. Of the last 11 test 6 of them have ended in failure. It will be interesting to see how this effects the 955's as the class was delayed because the the first missile slated to be used with the boat also had a handful of failures and it was decided to go with the current missile.

Adam
 

flateric

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
9,047
Reaction score
874
oh, Adam, you are hitting a raw nerve...
today morning's rumor is that Solomonov lost his position as MIT chief...
 

Austin

ACCESS: Confidential
Joined
Jan 30, 2006
Messages
194
Reaction score
3
This failure of first stage seems to be Quality control issue , seems more to me like a deliberate attempt to sabotage or delay the program perhaps by rival design bureau.

They have first stage failure before and its impossible that post failure analysis this is a fundamental design flaw issue.
 

Triton

Donald McKelvy
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
9,719
Reaction score
503
Website
deeptowild.blogspot.com
Found these computer-generated models of the Project 955 Borey while surfing.
 

Attachments

  • 95560tf8.jpg
    95560tf8.jpg
    87.8 KB · Views: 97
  • 95562uj0.jpg
    95562uj0.jpg
    79.4 KB · Views: 89
  • 95561er3.jpg
    95561er3.jpg
    105.6 KB · Views: 101

Firefly 2

ACCESS: Secret
Joined
Jun 30, 2009
Messages
461
Reaction score
8
Those models show the Borey with a full complement of 4*65cm, 4*53 cm and 6 outside tubes remensicent of your modern Russian attack sub.... Wouldn't that be a little overkill for a boomer?
 

flateric

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
9,047
Reaction score
874
via CrazyMK at http://forums.airbase.ru/
she's glamorous!


 

Grey Havoc

The path not taken.
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2009
Messages
11,788
Reaction score
1,922
Firefly 2 said:
Those models show the Borey with a full complement of 4*65cm, 4*53 cm and 6 outside tubes remensicent of your modern Russian attack sub.... Wouldn't that be a little overkill for a boomer?

Maybe they were planning a companion SSGN class at one time?
 

Sea Skimmer

ACCESS: Secret
Joined
Jul 13, 2008
Messages
394
Reaction score
35
The external tubes are probably only be used for large submarine simulator type decoys. IIRC some earlier commie submarines had dedicated tubes for this too, in contrast to the USN which fires its submarine simulator out of the normal tubes (displacing weapons internally as a resulting) while having only small dedicated tubes for smaller types of decoys and noisemakers.

The mix of 65cm and 53cm tubes is logical enough for the Russians. They have some very long range anti submarine missiles you can only shoot out of 65cm, but most of the main anti submarine torpedo types they have are 53cm. So you need both. This is just what you get when you let the Russians design weapons, they love specialization. They'd design a different torpedo and torpedo tube caliber for each class of western SSN if given the chance.
 
Top