• Hi Guest! Forum rules have been updated. All users please read here.

PAK DA ""Poslannik" program - Tupolev 'Izdeliye 80' bomber

Acatomic

ACCESS: Restricted
Joined
Oct 18, 2020
Messages
36
Reaction score
50
I would assume Russia would also be developing an advanced EA platform to help escort its bomber.
Not really. Russia was never fond to dedicated EA-type platforms, mostly developing external sets for frontline bombers for that role (Su-24 and now 34 as examples)
What about Su-27?

Maybe we could add the name "Messenger" to the topic name.
 

Deino

ACCESS: Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2006
Messages
2,873
Reaction score
770
I would assume Russia would also be developing an advanced EA platform to help escort its bomber.
Not really. Russia was never fond to dedicated EA-type platforms, mostly developing external sets for frontline bombers for that role (Su-24 and now 34 as examples)
What about Su-27?

Maybe we could add the name "Messenger" to the topic name.


Why? Only since a fan-site mentions and so so far obscure name?
 

tequilashooter

ACCESS: Secret
Joined
Jan 2, 2021
Messages
249
Reaction score
210
https://topcor.ru/19177-raskryty-vo...64316904169-prestable-app-host-sas-web-yp-164 same kind of source but calling the bomber the messenger. Also some artwork of "I wish this is how it looked like" images

View attachment 653534View attachment 653535
View attachment 653536


I won't complain if the real PAK-DA would end like this but how likely is such a design?
I am assuming not likely because the NK-32 tier 2 is meant to have a lower thrust which would seem that it would ideally look like the Su-70 but only bigger. But I still get mixed news on the speeds like this https://vpk.name/news/405588_pak_da_stanet_legche_bystree_i_malozametnee.html

The strategic bomber of the prospective long-range aviation complex (PAK DA), which began construction in Russia, will be more speedy and light, said Yuri Sytnik, a member of the board of the all-Russian organization "Officers of Russia".

He noted that today in service with long-range aircraft vks of Russia are built in the 1950s strategic bombers Tu-95, as well as Tu-160, whose age exceeds 30 years.

"We have very good developments, and on the basis of the KLA, where we gathered the best designers and the best engineers who set the tone for the entire world aviation industry, a new strategic bomber is being created, which will be, in particular, more high-speed. Motor-building companies are preparing the engine for it on the latest developments," he told RIA Novosti.

Sytnik stressed that modern technologies allow the use of composite materials in construction, due to which aircraft become lighter and not so much heated at supersonic speeds.


I am no aerodynamic expert but I am guessing if it really does go supersonic which that chances of that might be very low it might get shaped in some form like that, but I dont know.

@Acatomic thanks for that file.
 

Acatomic

ACCESS: Restricted
Joined
Oct 18, 2020
Messages
36
Reaction score
50
I think one of the most important questions is how high will it fly.

Will it be the same as B-21 or less? Personally I hope it will be the same as B-21's or higher. Maybe that report about high (subsonic) speed is somehow in connection with how high will it fly....maybe.
 

GARGEAN

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
May 7, 2018
Messages
581
Reaction score
275
He noted that today in service with long-range aircraft vks of Russia are built in the 1950s strategic bombers Tu-95, as well as Tu-160, whose age exceeds 30 years.
Gosh I love this type of shit) Oldest Tu-95MS is from 1983, so essentially same as B-1B. But sure, "russian bombers belong to a museum" (unlike B-52 youngest of which was made in 1965).
 

kaiserbill

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Jun 7, 2006
Messages
1,431
Reaction score
391
I suspect that this exists worldwide, and is simply a way of keeping programmes nudging forward.
Is there any OFFICIAL indication of when this aircraft is likely to be unveiled?
I am aware that the final general configuration, minus tweaks, is settled.
 

tequilashooter

ACCESS: Secret
Joined
Jan 2, 2021
Messages
249
Reaction score
210

MOSCOW, April 2 - RIA Novosti. The Russian Defense Ministry has approved the final look of the stealth bomber, also called the Perspective Long-Range Aviation Complex (PAK DA), which is being created by Tupolev, with priority given to reducing the aircraft's signature and long-range weapons, a source in the military-industrial complex told RIA Novosti.

"Based on the results of a series of tests of aircraft mock-ups for radar signature, as well as the results of checks of the aerodynamic qualities of aircraft mock-ups at TsAGI, the Russian military department approved the final technical appearance of the PAK DA. Development work under the program is at the detailed design stage, several prototypes of a promising bomber are under construction. ", - said the interlocutor of the agency.

According to him, the new bomber will be built according to the "flying wing" aerodynamic scheme, will receive a subsonic speed and a long flight duration, it will use only intra-fuselage weapons, including promising long-range cruise missiles and hypersonic missiles, the on-board equipment of the aircraft will be maximally automated, up to to optional unmanned use, and the priority in the PAK DA concept is given to "stealth" technologies and appropriate tactics of use, including "long arm" (long-range weapons).

"It is also assumed that the bomber will be able to control groups of unmanned aerial vehicles and will be able to use the entire range of air-to-air missiles," the source added.
 

In_A_Dream

ACCESS: Secret
Joined
Jun 3, 2019
Messages
254
Reaction score
112
I think it's important to keep in mind that it's entirely possible that Russia has kept a manned flying wing test article under wraps for quite some time.
 

Acatomic

ACCESS: Restricted
Joined
Oct 18, 2020
Messages
36
Reaction score
50
So that thing in the pictures is what they're making?
No.

Approving the final design while at the same time already building prototype's probably means that when we see the first flight in late 2023 there will be some things missing on the aircraft, maybe flat nozzle.
 

overscan (PaulMM)

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 27, 2005
Messages
12,802
Reaction score
4,535
He noted that today in service with long-range aircraft vks of Russia are built in the 1950s strategic bombers Tu-95, as well as Tu-160, whose age exceeds 30 years.
Gosh I love this type of shit) Oldest Tu-95MS is from 1983, so essentially same as B-1B. But sure, "russian bombers belong to a museum" (unlike B-52 youngest of which was made in 1965).
Tu-95MS is a still essentially a 1950s plane design, just built in the 1980s.
 

GARGEAN

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
May 7, 2018
Messages
581
Reaction score
275
He noted that today in service with long-range aircraft vks of Russia are built in the 1950s strategic bombers Tu-95, as well as Tu-160, whose age exceeds 30 years.
Gosh I love this type of shit) Oldest Tu-95MS is from 1983, so essentially same as B-1B. But sure, "russian bombers belong to a museum" (unlike B-52 youngest of which was made in 1965).
Tu-95MS is a still essentially a 1950s plane design, just built in the 1980s.
Not sure man who said that phrase is aware of that. And pretty sure his feelings about B-52 are different.
 

Evgeniy

ACCESS: Confidential
Joined
Mar 30, 2020
Messages
83
Reaction score
102
Speculation?

View: https://twitter.com/FelonFrazor/status/1384533850504695810?s=20

EzbaCyvXIAAJI8i
 

flateric

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
9,142
Reaction score
1,256
This is Piotr Butowski graphics from the last A&C.
 

flanker

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Mar 20, 2008
Messages
893
Reaction score
122
Unicornski has an uncanny way of you know... being correct. It is almost as if he knows what he is talking about and has good sources. So yeah, i am willing to bet some shekels this is pretty decent approximation to what the real thing will be like.
 

Josh_TN

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Sep 4, 2019
Messages
764
Reaction score
396
I’ve no doubt the wings and fuselage will adhere to that shape; it’s the logical shape for any low RCS bomb unless you are trying to break the sound barrier. The placement and shape of intakes seems less convincing. Presumably we’ll know in a couple years.
 

Similar threads

Top