Obscure or fake German AAM

Petrus

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2006
Messages
641
Reaction score
396
Here you've got a picture from https://www.deviantart.com/nino39/art/Luftwaffe-ME-1000-758308083. As you may see it is an alternate universe fighter from the late 1960s in the III Reich Luftwaffe markings. Obviously it is a quite decent drawing of the HA-300 albeit with some additions. Namely there is a gun port and a drop tank, which the actual (i.e. prototype) HA-300 lacked, while under the wing there is an air-to-air missile.
The missile doesn't resemble anything I know. So I wonder whether it is a pure invention of the picture's author or rather he/she used a might-have-been missile developed sometime in the 1960s. Such a near-real missile would have been German, I suppose, as if the AU Luftwaffe in 1967 had used German aircraft they would have used German missiles too.

Can anyone here recognise the missile?

Piotr

luftwaffe_me_1000_by_nino39_dcjh69f-fullview.jpg
 

Dilandu

I'm dissatisfied, which means, I exist.
Joined
May 30, 2013
Messages
1,757
Reaction score
1,421
Website
fonzeppelin.livejournal.com
The missile doesn't resemble anything I know. So I wonder whether it is a pure invention of the picture's author or rather he/she used a might-have-been missile developed sometime in the 1960s. Such a near-real missile would have been German, I suppose, as if the AU Luftwaffe in 1967 had used German aircraft they would have used German missiles too.

Hm...

A very strange-looking missile; almost as it have a booster. Could it possibly be that author simply do not knew exactly what he doing?
 

Tzoli

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 1, 2011
Messages
1,775
Reaction score
1,084
I've asked him, will post the answer if he answers.
 

Grzesio

ACCESS: Secret
Joined
Mar 20, 2008
Messages
275
Reaction score
110
Website
chemnitzer27kb.blogspot.com
Are you serious?
Don't you see a second homing head immediately behind forward wings (i.e. wings of the inner missile)? And a lower fin of the inner missile partially protruding under the fuselage of the outer missile, just forward of its lower wing?
And two launchers under the wing? :)
 

Jemiba

Moderator
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2006
Messages
8,348
Reaction score
1,542
Grzesio is right, I think, that's here is one of the two missiles under the left wing.

1588845508586.png

Perhaps not meant as an AAM ...
 

Petrus

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2006
Messages
641
Reaction score
396
Don't you see a second homing head immediately behind forward wings (i.e. wings of the inner missile)? And a lower fin of the inner missile partially protruding under the fuselage of the outer missile, just forward of its lower wing?
And two launchers under the wing? :)
You're quite right indeed, appatently I must have overlooked the details. Frankly I haven't looked there carefully enough, for I assumed that under each wing there is space only for one hardpoint, as the HA-300's wingspan was 5.84 m (each wing's span was around 2+ m). That the drawing's author put there two hardpoints indicates rather clearly that the missile cannot be a real thing. It has also ridiculous proportions being short (approx. 2.25 m) and fat (appox. 0.25 m).

As for the real HA-300 I suspect it was to carry missiles (Sidewinders of course) not under wings but at wing-tip rails. Such an arrangment was used by Messerschmitt in the VJ-101B design (see the drawing attached hereto, also https://www.secretprojects.co.uk/threads/ewr-vj-101c-d-e-vtol-fighter-projects.964/#post-116566), which had a new fuselage housing eight engines but its wings were almost identical to those of the HA-300. The VJ-101B sports missiles also under its fuselage, but personally I doubt that the HA-300 would have carried missiles in that manner, as its fuselage was much narrower than that of the VJ-101B, which left no space for missile rails under intakes.

Piotr
 

Attachments

  • VJ-101B1.jpg
    VJ-101B1.jpg
    84 KB · Views: 37
Last edited:

Similar threads

Top