• Hi Guest! Forum rules have been updated. All users please read here.

Mig 7.01

Antonio

ACCESS: Top Secret
Staff member
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2006
Messages
3,466
Reaction score
195
Superb, thanks again!

Antonio
 

elider

ACCESS: Confidential
Joined
Feb 16, 2006
Messages
122
Reaction score
2
Tease on! Tease on! Wonderful renderings from you on several topics. Thanks.
 

blackkite

Don't laugh, don't cry, don't even curse, but.....
Joined
May 31, 2007
Messages
7,378
Reaction score
2,557
What a beauty! Blended wing body double delta. It must be a super cruiser. We can appreciate it's sharp configuration only by Jozef's 3D model!
 

overscan (PaulMM)

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 27, 2005
Messages
12,360
Reaction score
3,395
Indeed it has no trace of Mikoyan heritage, looking much more like a Sukhoi design.
 

frank

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
May 20, 2006
Messages
617
Reaction score
13
Isn't it supposedly based on a Su design? One of the T-60S relatives?



overscan said:
Indeed it has no trace of Mikoyan heritage, looking much more like a Sukhoi design.
 

pesholito

ACCESS: Restricted
Joined
Jun 9, 2008
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Jozef , would you please post more renderings of the MiG 70.1. I am sure I speak not just for myself.
 

PlanesPictures

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
May 13, 2006
Messages
977
Reaction score
475
I'm working on it. I'm not fully satisfied with last pictures and I migrate Mig 7.01's model it in my next renderer (Vue Infinite) and I will try to do them there.
 

Eppy1951

ACCESS: Restricted
Joined
Dec 30, 2007
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
We have Sc 1 :) and Sc 3, :) both of which are marvelous. Sc 2 ??? ??? ??? :(
 

Avimimus

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Dec 16, 2007
Messages
1,968
Reaction score
83
Er... wasn't the T-60s concept referred to actually a mislabelled 7.01? ;)
 

kilokb

ACCESS: Restricted
Joined
Feb 19, 2008
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Very nice concept. I'd like to see one with TV nozzles and twin canted tails. By the way have you published renderings of the NG 2018 bomber project... the one that looks like the X-47?
Again, your work makes me jealous, thanks :D
 

flateric

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
9,045
Reaction score
871
What for heavy long-range interceptor needs thrust vectoring?
 

overscan (PaulMM)

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 27, 2005
Messages
12,360
Reaction score
3,395
Low drag manouvering at supersonic cruise speeds? Elimination of vertical tail to save weight (and drag)?
 

pesholito

ACCESS: Restricted
Joined
Jun 9, 2008
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Wow, very nice Jozef! My compliments on your skills and talent! And of course ...we want more!
 

kilokb

ACCESS: Restricted
Joined
Feb 19, 2008
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
What for heavy long-range interceptor needs thrust vectoring?

I'm assuming that the dorsal mounted inlet is to reduce RCS, and therefor wondering about the single vertical ( 90deg. corner reflector)stab. as far as TV, Overscan is right... and they can also reduce RCS. Don't get me wrong, love the image, just wondering.
 

Merv_P

ACCESS: Confidential
Joined
Jul 29, 2006
Messages
115
Reaction score
5
I also have Carrara; but your work is proof that it's the skill of the artist rather than the quality of the software that matters.

Do you model in Carrara as well as render, Josef?
 

PlanesPictures

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
May 13, 2006
Messages
977
Reaction score
475
As modeller I use Rhinoceros 3. Its NURBS are excellent.
I have two renders - Carrara 5 Pro and Vue 6 Infinite (but long years I used freeware PovRay). Carrara is very fast but needs backgrounds from other sources. Vue is fantastic landscape engine but it is relatively slower.
 

Gavin

ACCESS: Confidential
Joined
Apr 4, 2006
Messages
59
Reaction score
3
kilokb said:
What for heavy long-range interceptor needs thrust vectoring?

I'm assuming that the dorsal mounted inlet is to reduce RCS, and therefor wondering about the single vertical ( 90deg. corner reflector)stab. as far as TV, Overscan is right... and they can also reduce RCS. Don't get me wrong, love the image, just wondering.

The design apparently isn't meant to have "all-around" stealth. But from the forward hemisphere, especially against ground-based radars, it should have a very low RCS indeed. Considering the range at which this aircraft would engage targets, would all-around stealth and TVC be worth the additional cost and complexity? It seems Mikoyan didn't think so.

Either way, the renderings are spectacular.
 

Similar threads

Top