US Army - Lockheed Martin Long Range Precision Fires (LRPF)

Reliable, proven hypergliders existed decades before reliable, proven scramjets first burned. The TPS on C-HGB functions fine.

The "weird" part is that the same company that had fairly little trouble adapting Tomahawk to ground launch, developing a ground launched boost-glide missile, and are making the Zumwalts into hypersonic missile cruisers somehow can't make a B-52 drop a rocket reliably.

ARRW's problems all stemmed from relatively more simple things like shroud separation, shackle release failure, and booster ignition issues.

LM Space vs LM Missiles and Fire Control? Some of the primes have incredible internal turf wars - e.g. working at "Northrop" or working at "Grumman"
 
Last edited:
Not really if you stop to think bout it.

We been messing around with Ram/Scramjets types since what the 50s? With multiple different designs that just missed making it prime time due to multiple reasons ranging from do we need this to budget. We have loads of experience with thise that we can just look over at the old file cabinet and pull out a design to dust off. Like hell isn't HAWC basically the unholy hybrid of the ASLAM and X43?

While the boost gliders always been a fairly niche deal due to their inherent limitations. That one always been a cool trick to mess around with and rarely a serious weapon idea til recently. Even the old Pershing and Starbolt was more of a MARV then a hypersonic.
They were going to blow the dust off ASALM/SLAT/etc. for LRASM-B but got scared off almost before the ink was dry on the announcement. "Too hard."
 
Fasthawk was another missed opportunity. 700lb warhead for 700 miles at Mach 4 and fit in a Mk41 VLS. That was the claim anyway.

Seriously, what is wrong with the US and its start-stop, start-stop, start-stop attitude to the development of hypersonic missiles and propulsion? If they'd started and funded consistently (Emphasis on the consistently part) several of these programmes over the years and decades they'd have several operational systems by now. A good example of where the US DOD really dropped the ball was with the ASALM for example.

Another site’s story

That will be causing some serious heartburn in the PLA's high command;):p:D.
 
So there's still a "Grumman" and a "Northrop"? do please tell.
Its just an internal lingo thing - if you're an east coast "old guy" you describe your job as being at "Grumman" but the west cost boomers call it "northrop".

But how it actually manifests: the big contractors have internal entities with separate P&Ls. So in a hypothetical LRPF example, if someone at LM Space decides to buy a radar (or whatever) from LM Missiles and Fire Control, the manager at M&FC has near-to-no incentive to be helpful if LMS changes requirements on them.
 
Typhon. (Seems a bit ambitious of a name if you ask me. Now if they'd put Project Pluto into production. . .)
The open core nuclear ramjet?

That has a greater likelihood to be used as a planetary probe over at NASA than as a missile... Send one into the atmospheres of Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Titan, etc.
 
More Typhoon launchers can always be deployed;).
Sod it, deploy the converted oil rig already.

Typhon. (Seems a bit ambitious of a name if you ask me. Now if they'd put Project Pluto into production. . .)
I think all ground-based Tomahawk launchers have to end in '-phon'. It's the law. Gryphon, Typhon....
 
Concerning the Typhon being deployed to the Phillipines well Defense Updates has just put out a video about that:


The U.S. Army has sent its Typhon system overseas for the first time, to take part in an exercise in the Philippines.
A press release stated, “In a historic first, the 1st Multi-Domain Task Force successfully deployed the Mid-Range Capability (MRC) missile system to Northern Luzon, Philippines, on April 11, 2024, as part of Exercise Salaknib 24. This landmark deployment marks a significant milestone for the new capability while enhancing interoperability, readiness, and defense capabilities in coordination with the Armed Forces of the Philippines.”
The system was transported by a C-17 Globemaster III.
Viewers may note that US Army Pacific commander Gen. Charles Flynn told reporters last year the new launcher would be bound for the Indo-Pacific region, but didn’t disclose where or if the US had struck a deal with a foreign government to rest it on its soil.In this video, Defense Updates analyzes why US Army sending Typhon to the Philippines is a significant message to China ?
Chapters:
00:11 INTRODUCTION
02:12 TYPHON WEAPONS SYSTEM
03:37 SM-6 MISSILE
05:55 TOMAHAWK MISSILE
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom