Hypersonic Interceptor Technology Testbed (HITT) 1997-2000

flateric

ACCESS: USAP
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
1 April 2006
Messages
10,719
Reaction score
6,675
In 1998, SMDC commissioned the Hypersonic Interceptor Technology Testbed program
which was designed to fly between Mach 8 and 9 (project 29). This program spawned hardware which deflected
canted carbon-carbon fins into full Mach 9 airflows in under 4.5ms with piezoelectric elements. This
demonstrated that not only were these actuators capable of inducing large moments to counter the Mach 9 flows,
but they are among the world’s fastest (if not the fastest) proportional missile fin actuator ever developed.
Figure 5 shows the HITT test vehicle configuration and different fin deflections corresponding to various types
of maneuvers.
 

Attachments

  • HITT-Barret.jpg
    HITT-Barret.jpg
    338 KB · Views: 264
  • HITT-2.jpg
    HITT-2.jpg
    8.7 KB · Views: 270
  • HITT-3.jpg
    HITT-3.jpg
    10.2 KB · Views: 248
  • HITT.jpg
    HITT.jpg
    4.4 KB · Views: 239
  • Wednesday13654barrett.pdf
    3.8 MB · Views: 23
Very interesting. (Did Barrett Arms come up with the idea? ??? )
 
sferrin said:
Very interesting. (Did Barrett Arms come up with the idea? ??? )

Nope. Barrett Aerospace Technologies looks like a small consultancy run by Ronald Barrett, an Aerospace Engineering professor at Kansas University (hence the KU logo on the slide). He's Director of KU's Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory, whihc explains his interest in this project.

https://ae.engr.ku.edu/ron-barrett
 
TomS said:
sferrin said:
Very interesting. (Did Barrett Arms come up with the idea? ??? )

Nope. Barrett Aerospace Technologies looks like a small consultancy run by Ronald Barrett, an Aerospace Engineering professor at Kansas University (hence the KU logo on the slide). He's Director of KU's Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory, whihc explains his interest in this project.

https://ae.engr.ku.edu/ron-barrett

Wonder how the Barrett Arms log ended up on it.
 

Attachments

  • logo.png
    logo.png
    42.6 KB · Views: 187
It's slightly different? Three crosshairs instead of one, and not on the A.

More seriously, it looks like they stole a version of the Barrett Firearms logo. That's embarrassing.
 
In their defense, the PI had worked on a guided round for the Barrett .50 cal.
 
marauder2048 said:
In their defense, the PI had worked on a guided round for the Barrett .50 cal.

Oh, I hadn't seen that. Quite a coincidence of names, isn't it?
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom