Grumman Space Shuttle : Design 518 & 532 to H-33

hesham

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
26 May 2006
Messages
32,495
Reaction score
11,579
Hi,

I found that report about the Grumman H-33,they said it was drawing number
518,and I don't know if they mean G-518 or not.

http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19720005228_1972005228.pdf
 

Attachments

  • H-33.JPG
    H-33.JPG
    33.7 KB · Views: 501
  • H-33 Data.JPG
    H-33 Data.JPG
    30 KB · Views: 421
The G-518 appears in my list as an "early orbiter project" so I guess it's safe to say that this is indeed a Model G-518 related proposal.
 
Stargazer2006 said:
The G-518 appears in my list as an "early orbiter project" so I guess it's safe to say that this is indeed a Model G-518 related proposal.

The Grumman Design 518 orbiter was an entirely different vehicle. See attached photos of the correct 518 orbiter, from the Grumman model shop. Note how the number 518 is cleverly painted on the orbiter's vertical fin.
 

Attachments

  • Grumman Design 518 01.jpg
    Grumman Design 518 01.jpg
    92.7 KB · Views: 542
  • Grumman Design 518 02.jpg
    Grumman Design 518 02.jpg
    135 KB · Views: 530
circle-5 said:
The Grumman Design 518 orbiter was an entirely different vehicle.

Maybe so. But then the same model number could refer to quite a series of alternate designs. In case you did not see it in the photograph, it says "DRAWING NUMBER: 518 MOD 826". It seems logical that "518" indicates the model and "826" the variant.
 
Re: Grumman 518

That's a very handsome bird...

I like the proportions, the dihedral...

Thank you.
 
Another view of the 1970 Grumman Design 518 Orbiter model, plus a Grumman rendering of the 518 separating from its manned booster, plus a rendering of the H-33. Let's see if the H-33 has anything in common with Design 518, that would justify identical model numbers.

The H-33 was proposed later, in 1971, during the third contract of Shuttle Phase B studies; it had three, smaller main engines instead of two on the 518; it used a completely different, Boeing G-3 booster and was attached in a dorsal, not ventral, configuration; it was much smaller than the 518 and was not fully reusable. It was considered a stage-and-a-half design, while the 518 was fully reusable. The H-33 relied on two disposable LH2 external tanks (over 25 metric tons ea.) mounted on the fuselage sides, whereas the 518 carried all of its propellants internally -- note H-33 wind tunnel model photo caption: without external tanks. Design 518 had a radically different, lifting body type airframe; it also had a much higher staging velocity than the H-33, and the list goes on. Of course, the anti-glare shields on both orbiters are black, so that could make them "related" projects.

It is, in fact, *not* correct to assume that Drawing Number 518 could be anything other than just that -- a drawing number. The actual item Description in Hesham's document is "Basic H-33 Orbiter Body". It appears just above said drawing number.

Both renderings were lifted off the Internet -- thank you to the forgotten sources.
 

Attachments

  • Grumman H-33 Stack.jpg
    Grumman H-33 Stack.jpg
    45.9 KB · Views: 206
  • Grumman Design 518 04.jpg
    Grumman Design 518 04.jpg
    27.1 KB · Views: 210
  • Grumman Design 518 03.jpg
    Grumman Design 518 03.jpg
    89 KB · Views: 455
And here is a 3-View drawing of the Grumman H-33 orbiter, from the NTRS document.
 

Attachments

  • Grumman H-33 3-View.jpg
    Grumman H-33 3-View.jpg
    76.3 KB · Views: 159
Grumman Boeing H33 space shuttle booster, sans orbiter, concept model found on eBay.

URL:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Original-Vintage-1960s-Experimental-Grumman-Boeing-Space-Shuttle-Desktop-Model-/270863765527?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item3f10bd1017

Seller's description:
Original experimental concept flyback space shuttle booster. This is a Grumman Aerospace Corporation-Boeing concept. I do not believe very many of these desktop models were made. I have done a fair amount of research and have only located one other one.The other is on display at the Smithsonian in New York City [sic]. It is 17 1/2 inches tall with a 11 inch wingspan. This model originally had a orbiter vehicle attached to the back of the booster. It has not been with the booster since I have owned it. The booster is in good condition but does have several paint chips that are visibly seen in the photos provided.
 

Attachments

  • $(KGrHqZHJC4E7BcviTwoBO1V,h8!sw~~60_3.jpg
    $(KGrHqZHJC4E7BcviTwoBO1V,h8!sw~~60_3.jpg
    34 KB · Views: 131
  • $(KGrHqRHJC4E7BcvhWyTBO1VbZyT5!~~60_3.jpg
    $(KGrHqRHJC4E7BcvhWyTBO1VbZyT5!~~60_3.jpg
    43.5 KB · Views: 105
  • $(KGrHqNHJCME63(5DhVhBO1VbGd94g~~60_3.jpg
    $(KGrHqNHJCME63(5DhVhBO1VbGd94g~~60_3.jpg
    46.9 KB · Views: 108
  • $(KGrHqRHJDcE63Z(lQ40BO1Vbr(IC!~~60_3.jpg
    $(KGrHqRHJDcE63Z(lQ40BO1Vbr(IC!~~60_3.jpg
    29.2 KB · Views: 119
  • $(KGrHqZHJDcE63Z(mmt(BO1V,QGzVg~~60_3.jpg
    $(KGrHqZHJDcE63Z(mmt(BO1V,QGzVg~~60_3.jpg
    43.9 KB · Views: 116
  • $(KGrHqZHJDIE7Bcviu-zBO1VZ-JOWw~~60_3.jpg
    $(KGrHqZHJDIE7Bcviu-zBO1VZ-JOWw~~60_3.jpg
    63.5 KB · Views: 113
  • $(KGrHqZHJ!8E63SLifzpBO1V,z55cQ~~60_3.jpg
    $(KGrHqZHJ!8E63SLifzpBO1V,z55cQ~~60_3.jpg
    39.5 KB · Views: 123
  • $(KGrHqFHJCsE7BcvggltBO1VZq7UZg~~60_3.jpg
    $(KGrHqFHJCsE7BcvggltBO1VZq7UZg~~60_3.jpg
    47.3 KB · Views: 389
Grumman Boeing H33 space shuttle booster, sans orbiter, concept model found on eBay.
 

Attachments

  • $(KGrHqVHJCME63(5Ety5BO1Vb-giPQ~~60_3.jpg
    $(KGrHqVHJCME63(5Ety5BO1Vb-giPQ~~60_3.jpg
    44.4 KB · Views: 108
  • $(KGrHqFHJBEE63St8HCFBO1VcR)Ggw~~60_3.jpg
    $(KGrHqFHJBEE63St8HCFBO1VcR)Ggw~~60_3.jpg
    57.5 KB · Views: 126

Attachments

  • 6.JPG
    6.JPG
    20.7 KB · Views: 116
  • 5.JPG
    5.JPG
    37.8 KB · Views: 116
  • 4.JPG
    4.JPG
    35 KB · Views: 111
  • 3.JPG
    3.JPG
    33.9 KB · Views: 98
  • 2.JPG
    2.JPG
    37.8 KB · Views: 102
  • 1.JPG
    1.JPG
    45.1 KB · Views: 120
Last edited by a moderator:
circle-5 said:
Grumman H-33: yes. Grumman Design 518: no.

If you know more about the designations used by Grumman for the H-33, please tell us.

What I have in my list is that the G-518 slot was used for a series of orbiter projects, including H-33 (518 MOD 826).
 
Hopefully this hasn't been posted before - I came across it while looking for something else:

 

Attachments

  • 20160012503_Page_037.png
    20160012503_Page_037.png
    642.9 KB · Views: 253
  • 20160012503_Page_032.png
    20160012503_Page_032.png
    105.8 KB · Views: 219
  • 20160012503_Page_031.png
    20160012503_Page_031.png
    155.8 KB · Views: 207
  • 20160012503_Page_030.png
    20160012503_Page_030.png
    104.8 KB · Views: 215
  • 20160012503_Page_029.png
    20160012503_Page_029.png
    169.7 KB · Views: 232
  • 20160012503_Page_028.png
    20160012503_Page_028.png
    65 KB · Views: 427
  • 20160012503_Page_027.png
    20160012503_Page_027.png
    60.6 KB · Views: 449
  • 20160012503_Page_023.png
    20160012503_Page_023.png
    480 KB · Views: 467
  • 20160012503_Page_021.png
    20160012503_Page_021.png
    560.9 KB · Views: 501
  • 20160012503_Page_007.png
    20160012503_Page_007.png
    326 KB · Views: 510
Amazing find my dear Paul,

and this report solves the problem in the H-33 topic;
 

Attachments

  • Grumman  III.png
    Grumman III.png
    146 KB · Views: 278
  • Grumman  II.png
    Grumman II.png
    114.1 KB · Views: 272
  • Grumman  I.png
    Grumman I.png
    138 KB · Views: 265
  • Grumman.png
    Grumman.png
    84.2 KB · Views: 243
Last edited by a moderator:
What a truly astonishing report. Packed with beautiful pictures. also exploring the feasibility of a F-1 powered booster, which made so much sense.
 
Factory model of the Grumman Design 518 Orbiter. Until this report, I had no idea the front panel line was for a swing-nose and the ones just behind the flight deck were for pop-out pairs of turbojets. What an exceptional document!
 

Attachments

  • Grumman Design 518 STS Orbiter.jpg
    Grumman Design 518 STS Orbiter.jpg
    47.9 KB · Views: 330
I just purchased this very model off eBay that is pictured in the report. Design 532.
Only the booster with the 5 F1 engines, too bad the orbiter has been lost to time.
This booster had 5 F1 engines and would fly back! Woof! What a monster.
 

Attachments

  • s-l1600.jpg
    s-l1600.jpg
    96.1 KB · Views: 129
  • s-l1601.jpg
    s-l1601.jpg
    138.9 KB · Views: 125
I just purchased this very model off eBay that is pictured in the report. Design 532.
Only the booster with the 5 F1 engines, too bad the orbiter has been lost to time.
This booster had 5 F1 engines and would fly back! Woof! What a monster.

The late John Aldaz (circle5) had the orbiter and was desperate to buy the booster, and his collection has been sold on, so the orbiter is out there somewhere.
 
I just purchased this very model off eBay that is pictured in the report. Design 532.
Only the booster with the 5 F1 engines, too bad the orbiter has been lost to time.
This booster had 5 F1 engines and would fly back! Woof! What a monster.
Its large...more like a piece of furniture than a model. I am boxing it up for shipment.... Hodson2000@aol.com
 
Hopefully this hasn't been posted before - I came across it while looking for something else:

Thank you for having posted that link Paul. I used it as a major reference to my lasted twitter thread:
View: https://twitter.com/ArnieHolmes/status/1391963028711780353
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom