Garber Smithsonian restoration facility- pictures, trivia, and ID request

AeroFranz

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
May 4, 2008
Messages
2,392
Reaction score
422
On Sunday I spent three hours at the Paul Garber facility in Silver Hill, MD. For those who don't know, it's where the Smithsonian keeps all the planes and space artifacts not on display or in unrestored condition. Obviously i took a bunch of pictures and wanted to share them, and ask for some identification help.

First picture is of a wooden prop. Looks like something that belongs in a YO-3 or rather a QT-2. I asked the docent, he confirmed it was from a quiet aircraft, but he said it predated QT-2...Any ideas?

Second picture is the restoration of the He-219 wing. The fuselage and nacelles are already waiting for it at the Udvar Hazy museum.

Third picture is from one of the hangars they showed me. It's full to the brim with aero engines. The shelves each can contain 4 large engines, more of the smaller variety. There must have been some 200 engines, ranging from one-offs to Conquerors, DB-601s, V-1710s, and obscure japanese ones. The docent says they have about as many engines as the rest of the world's collections combined. I believe him.

God only knows how many other things they have in the thousands of crates they have in the 20+ hangars. I think this one was the arch of the covenant (fourth pic).

Next picture is a bit of trivia. name the airplane this bare aluminum part belongs to.

Then there is a picture of one of the two Kika airframes they have in storage (as well as engines). there is talk of making a full airplane out of the two.

Last picture is of a set of wings I was not able to identify (white wings with strangely thin nacelles). the planform is straight rectangular, untapered. I estimate it's about 6-7 meters span. It must be for a high wing aircraft, I could see no sign of landing gear attachments. i am puzzled by those nacelles. Any ideas?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2053.JPG
    IMG_2053.JPG
    226.3 KB · Views: 161
  • He-219 wing.JPG
    He-219 wing.JPG
    232.8 KB · Views: 139
  • IMG_2076.JPG
    IMG_2076.JPG
    216.1 KB · Views: 141
  • IMG_2092.JPG
    IMG_2092.JPG
    261.3 KB · Views: 141
  • IMG_2100.JPG
    IMG_2100.JPG
    181.4 KB · Views: 150
  • Kika.JPG
    Kika.JPG
    226.1 KB · Views: 91
  • Mistery wings.JPG
    Mistery wings.JPG
    221.6 KB · Views: 91

AeroFranz

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
May 4, 2008
Messages
2,392
Reaction score
422
I could not not take pictures of the Horten flying wing. One picture shows some damage, which gives insight in the internal construction and materials.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2098.JPG
    IMG_2098.JPG
    201.5 KB · Views: 84
  • Damage.JPG
    Damage.JPG
    180.6 KB · Views: 78
  • Horten wings.JPG
    Horten wings.JPG
    184.4 KB · Views: 72

The Artist

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2009
Messages
638
Reaction score
292
My first thought on those wings was a Twin Otter but now I'm not sure as the engines look like they're too close to the wing tips to be a Twin Otter.
 

iverson

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Sep 24, 2009
Messages
534
Reaction score
456
Is the fifth (trivia) picture the remote-controlled tail turret of a Ju-388?
 

AeroFranz

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
May 4, 2008
Messages
2,392
Reaction score
422
Yeah, i thought about the twin otter, but I think this is smaller...however I think it must share the overall configuration, but I could be mistaken.

regarding the rotating structure, Iverson is correct! It's the tail turret of the 388. As a reward you get a frontal shot of the 388 next to the collection's Me-410.
I have to apologize for the sub-optimal angles from which i took the photos. All the airplanes are litterally crammed one next to the other and it's hard to get a good complete view.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2099.JPG
    IMG_2099.JPG
    192.9 KB · Views: 93

The Artist

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2009
Messages
638
Reaction score
292
I just had another thought. Could those wings be from one of the COIN prototypes? Didn't the early OV-10s have a shorter wingspan?
 

AeroFranz

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
May 4, 2008
Messages
2,392
Reaction score
422
I had the same thought. Looks like a slow but high-lift wing, and with two props you can get STOL out of it. But other than the OV-10 and the Model 48 charger, no LARA contender was built...and i don't think Garber would get a mockup.
Yeah, the OV-10 were supposed to have a 20' wingspan in order to takeoff from dirt roads, but that was dropped early in the life of the program.

By the way, is there any other explanation for the two structures I have been callling engine nacelles? they look awfully thin, IIRC they were little over a foot tall. What engine is that small?

If we can't positively ID this, i'll try pinging the docent, but even that does not guarantee we'll find out.
 

AeroFranz

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
May 4, 2008
Messages
2,392
Reaction score
422
A few more pictures of the -229, The fuselage of the BV-155, the sexy He-162, and a French Criquet and the XP-56
 

Attachments

  • Criquet He-162 XP-56.JPG
    Criquet He-162 XP-56.JPG
    215.2 KB · Views: 92
  • He-162.JPG
    He-162.JPG
    390.7 KB · Views: 70
  • BV-155.JPG
    BV-155.JPG
    243.4 KB · Views: 77
  • Horten nose.JPG
    Horten nose.JPG
    216.2 KB · Views: 72
  • Horten front.JPG
    Horten front.JPG
    212 KB · Views: 77

AeroFranz

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
May 4, 2008
Messages
2,392
Reaction score
422
I got in touch with one of the curators. Turns out the wing I was trying to identify belongs to the VZ-2. The small dimensions of the nacelles derives from the fact that there is no engine mounted there, as the props were shaft-driven from the fuselage.
 

Madoc

ACCESS: Confidential
Joined
Dec 14, 2006
Messages
119
Reaction score
11
Folks,

I went to school at George Washington University there in DC and lived in the DC area for a few years after that. Hitting up the NASM was a favorite pastime of mine. For one thing, it was free. For another, I could (and did) drop by there just to reset my watch to the relay display of the US Naval Observatory's Atomic Clock.

I did manage to get out to the Garber a couple of times and that was truly a place where dreams were stored. On my first trip, I went with a friend of mine, Paul Anderson, who was a pilot. He's the one who noted the dream aspect of that place. The NASM down on the Mall is a wonderful place but it's there in the crowded shed of the Garber facility that you really get the sense of that intense dream of flight that took the form of all that aviation hardware piled about.

During my second trip out there our little tour group was brought by the Enola Gay which was still in the midst of being restored. She was up on a workframe and was in pieces. We got to poke our heads up into the bomb bay. We were also admonished not to touch the aircraft itself due to the oils and salts present in our skin and the ultimate effect it would have on the metals.

I have to say though, that I lingered to let the tour move on and then quickly reached out and put hand on the machine. Just below the mission markings.

Some day soon I'm going out to the Hazy and spend days just drinking that place in.

Madoc
 

Trident

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
May 8, 2006
Messages
1,289
Reaction score
787
Madoc said:
Some day soon I'm going out to the Hazy and spend days just drinking that place in.

You will not regret it. I went there with a partially full 512Mb SD card in my camera (which I would later lose on the flight back to Europe :( ) and that filled up completely in no time flat. Desperately I looked through all the pictures on the memory card, ruthlessly deleting anything worthless, but since I usually get rid of such immediately it was hopeless and I had to buy a new 1Gb card :) No way was I going to accept not having photos of all the stuff I had not captured yet!

Word of warning though, the last shuttle bus transfer back to Dulles airport departs the instant the museum officially closes, not realising that I went for a comfort break before leaving the building and ended up having to call a taxi.
 

fightingirish

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2006
Messages
2,550
Reaction score
1,249
Another important step in finishing the Museum’s He 219 Uhu (Owl) night fighter has been completed. Recently, the wing was painted and transported to the Steven F. Udvar-Hazy Center in Chantilly, Virginia, for the aircraft’s final assembly. [...]The wing was transported to the Udvar-Hazy Center, and was on view during our recent Open House, but no date has been set for the final assembly of He 219. Before this can happen some major issues have to be resolved—among others, the installation of the He 219’s main landing gear and the reverse-engineering of the aircraft’s antennas, which were lost after the aircraft arrived in the U.S.
Link: The National Air and Space Museum - Heinkel Night Fighter He 219: Wing Painting Complete
 

Bill S

ACCESS: Top Secret
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
May 17, 2008
Messages
609
Reaction score
674
Here is a shot of the He-219 from this past Sunday.

bill
 

Attachments

  • zHe-219A-2-WNr-290202-Upper-Right-Front-NASM-BillSpidle-20200906.jpg
    zHe-219A-2-WNr-290202-Upper-Right-Front-NASM-BillSpidle-20200906.jpg
    1.6 MB · Views: 69

Apophenia

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2007
Messages
2,892
Reaction score
1,565
The original query was a looong way back ... but I was surprised that no-one has mentioned that 5-bladed propeller. For those who don't know, this was a NACA-designed propeller fitted to Stinson L-5E Sentinel (44-17939/'LD 939') in 1947.

NACA was investigating the potential for quieter light aircraft at the urging of the CAA, Aircraft Industries Association, and the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association. The object was to produce light aircraft designs which could operate from more conveniently-located airfields (ie: in densely-populated areas).

Comparison trials were flown in early 1947 against a standard L-5 (185 hp Lycoming O-435-1 HO6 direct-driving an 85 inch diameter 2-blade propeller at 2,500 rpm). The modified L-5E had the same engine but "geared down by a ratio of 2.8 to 1." The new, rubber-edged propeller had an increased diameter of 96 inches.

A large muffler was also installed - exhausting upwards near the fin. With the reduced propeller tip-speed and engine muffling, noise was reduced from a standard 90 decibels down to 66 decibels. The test were considered successful but such a great degree of noise-reduction was judged unnecessary.


Air Scoop, Issue 20, Vol. 6, 23 May 1947, pg 1 & pg 3.

National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Langley Field, Va.: An N.A.C.A. "Quiet" propeller designed by the donor to reduce noise in light airplanes (N. A. M. 688).


 

Attachments

  • Stinson-L-5E-NACA-quiet-prop.jpg
    Stinson-L-5E-NACA-quiet-prop.jpg
    70.8 KB · Views: 53
  • Stinson-L-5E-NACA-EL-2000-00263.jpg
    Stinson-L-5E-NACA-EL-2000-00263.jpg
    217.4 KB · Views: 53

planeguy

ACCESS: Restricted
Joined
Nov 23, 2020
Messages
1
Reaction score
1
A few more pictures of the -229, The fuselage of the BV-155, the sexy He-162, and a French Criquet and the XP-56
In the picture with the BV 155, there is also a Fairchild PT-19A Cornell. Though, I have found some info on this aircraft, this is the only picture I know of that has the Smithsonian's PT-19A.
 

Similar threads

Top