• Hi Guest! Forum rules have been updated. All users please read here.

Fisher XP-75

elider

ACCESS: Confidential
Joined
Feb 16, 2006
Messages
122
Reaction score
8
Got this while touring WPAFB restoration facility looking for YF-23. Was told it is only example existant.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0779-1.jpg
    IMG_0779-1.jpg
    230.5 KB · Views: 659

jzichek

ACCESS: Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2008
Messages
275
Reaction score
94
Website
www.patreon.com
Fisher P-75 Eagle Brochure from May 1944

Just posted a new article at RetroMechanix.com presenting a very rare 51 page document on the Fisher P-75 Eagle:

5757609564_aabeab629c_o.jpg


It contains numerous high resolution detail photos and drawings of this flawed but not entirely unappealing aircraft, one of a handful of types powered by the mighty 24 cylinder Allison V-3420. Many of the photos are heavily retouched and portray an interesting intermediate stage between the original XP-75 and the final P-75A, retaining the Douglas-style tail of the former but having the bubble canopy of the latter. Ideal information for the modeler, historian, or general enthusiast wishing to get an in depth look at GM's failed foray into fighter aircraft design.

-Jared
 

convairxf92

The Original Landspeeder
Joined
May 31, 2009
Messages
39
Reaction score
3
It was a very strange plane. Thanks for posting the pic and the article reference. here's a pic of the Anigrand 1/144 scale kit I built a few years back.
 

Attachments

  • xp-75.jpg
    xp-75.jpg
    259.2 KB · Views: 547

JFC Fuller

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2012
Messages
2,539
Reaction score
1,045
Synchronising 4 machine guns to fire through a 6 bladed contra-rotating propeller must have been fun! That said, the 10 .50 cal armament would have been devastating. It would have been interesting to see P-75's flying with B-39s (same engine).
 

pathology_doc

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Jun 7, 2008
Messages
1,007
Reaction score
294
sealordlawrence said:
Synchronising 4 machine guns to fire through a 6 bladed contra-rotating propeller must have been fun! That said, the 10 .50 cal armament would have been devastating.

One must ask oneself - with the unavoidable drop in rate of fire from the synchronised guns (because they can't be firing all the time), would one even get the same rounds per minute into the sky as the P-47 could with two less barrels?
 

Archibald

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2006
Messages
5,817
Reaction score
4,066
Could that machine have be re-engined with a Sabre engine ?
 

Apophenia

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2007
Messages
2,775
Reaction score
1,280
Archibald said:
Could that machine have be re-engined with a Sabre engine ?

Power would be about right but the shafting would be completely different.

http://www.enginehistory.org/Gallery/JimBuckel/Allison%20V-3420%20for%20Fisher%20P-75A%20Eagle%201-17.JPG
 

sienar

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2009
Messages
701
Reaction score
372
Re: Fisher P-75 Eagle Brochure from May 1944

jzichek said:
Just posted a new article at RetroMechanix.com presenting a very rare 51 page document on the Fisher P-75 Eagle:

5757609564_aabeab629c_o.jpg


It contains numerous high resolution detail photos and drawings of this flawed but not entirely unappealing aircraft, one of a handful of types powered by the mighty 24 cylinder Allison V-3420. Many of the photos are heavily retouched and portray an interesting intermediate stage between the original XP-75 and the final P-75A, retaining the Douglas-style tail of the former but having the bubble canopy of the latter. Ideal information for the modeler, historian, or general enthusiast wishing to get an in depth look at GM's failed foray into fighter aircraft design.

-Jared

Thank you!!!

In one fell swoop you have not only reignited my interest in making an accurate version of this aircraft for xplane, but also provided me with all the data I was more or less missing. Once a few other projects are done, that is.
 

Kevin Renner

ACCESS: Confidential
Joined
Nov 6, 2007
Messages
98
Reaction score
7
As I understand it GM proposed this abbortion simply to get out of producing B-29 engine nacalles
 

sienar

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2009
Messages
701
Reaction score
372
Does anyone have more info on this modification? I'm guessing it was an attempt to fix the stability problems.
4564975290_bd8a2fb886_o.jpg
 

GTX

All hail the God of Frustration!!!
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2006
Messages
3,217
Reaction score
971
Website
beyondthesprues.com
Does anyone know what was presumably being tested here with the probes(?) behind the props:

20597232_469172953453595_1324497507850506340_n.jpg
 

Sundog

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2006
Messages
2,889
Reaction score
379
It's a rake to get readings behind the entire disk of the propeller. They were probably using it to test the efficiency of the propellers. By measuring the pressure distribution they can determine the velocity profile of the airflow through propeller disk.
 

kitnut617

ACCESS: Secret
Joined
Dec 15, 2006
Messages
435
Reaction score
171
pathology_doc said:
sealordlawrence said:
Synchronising 4 machine guns to fire through a 6 bladed contra-rotating propeller must have been fun! That said, the 10 .50 cal armament would have been devastating.
Johnbr said:
I would love to see how they did it.
One must ask oneself - with the unavoidable drop in rate of fire from the synchronised guns (because they can't be firing all the time), would one even get the same rounds per minute into the sky as the P-47 could with two less barrels?

Not as difficult as you might think. I worked it out some time ago by drawing it in my AutoCAD. As simply as possible, the props were geared in the remote speed reduction unit so would be 'timed' to the gun synchronization. It would just be like it had just one 3-blade prop. I've even worked this out for two 4-blade contra-prop arrangement. The diagram below show the blades only moving 60 degrees of rotation, so times this by three for one complete rotation.
 

Attachments

  • 3blade-contrprop-sequence.JPG
    3blade-contrprop-sequence.JPG
    56.6 KB · Views: 502

Foo Fighter

I came, I saw, I drank some tea (and had a bun).
Senior Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2016
Messages
2,069
Reaction score
969
http://retromechanix.com/fisher-p-75-advance-descriptive-data-may-20-1944/nggallery/image/image-791
 

sienar

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2009
Messages
701
Reaction score
372
Yep, its a rake for testing. There was quite of bit of testing done both by Fisher and NACA.

Here are some photos I've collected. First few are the intermediate design canopy, the last showing the assembly lines and jigs/tooling


Generally, a drop of 10/15% is what I've read for guns firing through a prop disk. So about half a guns fire is lost in the case of a P-75, so better than the P-47s 8 guns in the wing.
 

Attachments

  • showimage (1).jpg
    showimage (1).jpg
    55 KB · Views: 166
  • showimage (3).jpg
    showimage (3).jpg
    51.2 KB · Views: 155
  • showimage (4).jpg
    showimage (4).jpg
    48.7 KB · Views: 168
  • showimage (7).jpg
    showimage (7).jpg
    46.5 KB · Views: 196
  • general-motors-p-75-p-75a-eagle-photo-print-3.jpg
    general-motors-p-75-p-75a-eagle-photo-print-3.jpg
    66 KB · Views: 457
  • kl 04-2013 P-75 Eagle (04).jpg.5857186.jpg
    kl 04-2013 P-75 Eagle (04).jpg.5857186.jpg
    83 KB · Views: 448
  • kjhkh.jpg
    kjhkh.jpg
    379.1 KB · Views: 477
  • 9b80432738b338699aaf1c36af0cc54b.jpg
    9b80432738b338699aaf1c36af0cc54b.jpg
    348 KB · Views: 500

Sherman Tank

I don't want to change my personal text
Joined
Oct 15, 2016
Messages
197
Reaction score
112
Does anyone know if the oft-told story that Fisher and GM created the P-75 was to avoid having their factory assigned to build B-29s in any way true? I suspect it isn't because it doesn't make much sense but I've never seen evidence either way besides anecdote.
 

iverson

ACCESS: Secret
Joined
Sep 24, 2009
Messages
432
Reaction score
290
Sherman Tank said:
Does anyone know if the oft-told story that Fisher and GM created the P-75 was to avoid having their factory assigned to build B-29s in any way true? I suspect it isn't because it doesn't make much sense but I've never seen evidence either way besides anecdote.
I don't know. But the story makes perfect sense (of a sort). Commercial motives and profiteering were common enough in WW2, as they were in wars before and after. A native design using its own engines (Allison was a GM subsidiary) would have offered higher profits than licensing a Curtiss-Wright powered, Boeing designed airplane.
 

Colonial-Marine

Fighting the UAV mafia.
Joined
Oct 5, 2009
Messages
741
Reaction score
106
The P-75 to me is quite a fascinating aircraft especially in its final form where it was a new airplane versus one made from various parts of other aircraft. It's a shame the final product failed to meet the original specifications by such a large degree.

Did Fisher have any plans for an XP-75B or P-75B to make up some of the lost performance? Was there any avenue to do so other than increasing engine power?
 
Last edited:

airman

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Oct 14, 2007
Messages
1,255
Reaction score
112
Website
zeef.com
The P-75 to me is quite a fascinating aircraft, in it's final form where it was a new airplane (versus one made from various parts of other aircraft). It's a shame the final product failed to meet the original specifications by such a large degree.

Did Fisher have any plans for an XP-75B or P-75B to make up some of the lost performance? Was there any avenue to do so other than increasing engine power?
No , all issues was fixed with a great delay of flight of P-75A . In anyway scenario was changed and there were aircraft like P-38 with an awesome range .
 

windswords

ACCESS: Secret
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
372
Reaction score
130
It is very similar in appearance to the Yokosuka R2Y1, which is not uprising since they both had a similar layout. The R2Y1 used a single 6 blade propeller though.
 

Attachments

  • R2Y1-11 prototype, Japan, May 27, 1945.jpg
    R2Y1-11 prototype, Japan, May 27, 1945.jpg
    51.2 KB · Views: 118

blackkite

Don't laugh, don't cry, don't even curse, but.....
Joined
May 31, 2007
Messages
7,892
Reaction score
3,736
Hi!
 

Attachments

  • 090615-F-1234P-005.JPG
    090615-F-1234P-005.JPG
    53.9 KB · Views: 86
  • 171114-F-IO108-011.JPG
    171114-F-IO108-011.JPG
    77.3 KB · Views: 88

sienar

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2009
Messages
701
Reaction score
372
.
 

Attachments

  • kl 04-2013 P-75 Eagle (07).jpg.5857222.jpg
    kl 04-2013 P-75 Eagle (07).jpg.5857222.jpg
    113.5 KB · Views: 72
  • P_75A_44_44553_01_large.jpg
    P_75A_44_44553_01_large.jpg
    202.3 KB · Views: 68
  • p-75.jpg
    p-75.jpg
    23.6 KB · Views: 74
  • 9c5201ec333076418fd9eef28cd68185.jpg
    9c5201ec333076418fd9eef28cd68185.jpg
    46.5 KB · Views: 73
  • 4564344013_944fc95fb7_o.jpg
    4564344013_944fc95fb7_o.jpg
    23.4 KB · Views: 68
  • 5022048160_56c07c4721_o.jpg
    5022048160_56c07c4721_o.jpg
    40.2 KB · Views: 65
  • 5022048178_570b55eaa6_o.jpg
    5022048178_570b55eaa6_o.jpg
    74.1 KB · Views: 69
  • 27930870883_3b14c7498d_o.jpg
    27930870883_3b14c7498d_o.jpg
    50.2 KB · Views: 89

blackkite

Don't laugh, don't cry, don't even curse, but.....
Joined
May 31, 2007
Messages
7,892
Reaction score
3,736
I can understand the radiator position of this aircraft.:D
But..............
Perhaps this picture shows ram air intake and exhaust nozzle. Inline..........:confused:
 

Attachments

  • 090615-F-1234P-003.JPG
    090615-F-1234P-003.JPG
    50.2 KB · Views: 92
Last edited:

WJPearce

ACCESS: Confidential
Joined
Mar 22, 2008
Messages
63
Reaction score
30
I can understand the radiator position of this aircraft.:D
But..............
Perhaps this picture shows ram air intake and exhaust nozzle. Inline..........:confused:

The P-75 had air-cooled exhaust manifolds. A jacket surrounded the exhaust manifold and air was fed through that jacket. The air entered through the ram-air scoop and exited via the area around the exhaust pipes.
 

blackkite

Don't laugh, don't cry, don't even curse, but.....
Joined
May 31, 2007
Messages
7,892
Reaction score
3,736
Oh thanks a lot. What a surprising exhaust system!!:oops:
According to top early model picture, two ram air intakes were located behind the wind shield and integrated to exhaust nozzle cover.
24 exhaust nozzles were integrated 8 by exhaust manifolds.
 

Attachments

  • early model.jpg
    early model.jpg
    379.1 KB · Views: 68
  • pic1.jpg
    pic1.jpg
    437.1 KB · Views: 67
  • pic2.JPG
    pic2.JPG
    57.7 KB · Views: 65
  • pic3.JPG
    pic3.JPG
    42.8 KB · Views: 63
Last edited:

blackkite

Don't laugh, don't cry, don't even curse, but.....
Joined
May 31, 2007
Messages
7,892
Reaction score
3,736
Perhaps these picture shows exhaust gas manifolds(bottom silver pipe).
And air cooling jacket cover this manifolds?
 

Attachments

  • exhaust manifolds.JPG
    exhaust manifolds.JPG
    77.3 KB · Views: 64
  • engine and propeller drive shaft.JPG
    engine and propeller drive shaft.JPG
    62 KB · Views: 64
Last edited:

blackkite

Don't laugh, don't cry, don't even curse, but.....
Joined
May 31, 2007
Messages
7,892
Reaction score
3,736
These two nozzles are for exhaust gas and exhaust manifolds cooling air outlet?
Forward air intake is for air cooling jacket?
 

Attachments

  • 090615-F-1234P-003.JPG
    090615-F-1234P-003.JPG
    50.2 KB · Views: 66
Last edited:

blackkite

Don't laugh, don't cry, don't even curse, but.....
Joined
May 31, 2007
Messages
7,892
Reaction score
3,736
Hi!
"The 2,600 hp (1,939 kW) Allison V-3420-19 engine with a two-stage supercharger was positioned in the fuselage behind the pilot. Each of the engine’s four cylinder banks had an air-cooled exhaust manifold with two exhaust stacks protruding out of the fuselage............"

 

Attachments

  • fisher-xp-75-line.jpg
    fisher-xp-75-line.jpg
    623.3 KB · Views: 63
  • fisher-xp-75a-long-range-side.jpg
    fisher-xp-75a-long-range-side.jpg
    162.1 KB · Views: 70
Last edited:

WJPearce

ACCESS: Confidential
Joined
Mar 22, 2008
Messages
63
Reaction score
30
I am not 100% certain with the information below, but I believe it is correct.

The early XP-75s took in air for exhaust cooling from the top ducts and distributed it to all manifolds. See the drawing. The early XP-75s did not have the scoop on the sides. See the image of 44-32162, which was the second of six aircraft that made up the second batch (XP-75A) of prototype aircraft. Also, the exhaust cooling jacket as seen in the drawing is visible in the image of an XP-75A under construction. This is either 44-32165 or 44-32166, the last two aircraft of the second batch.

The P-75A production aircraft (44-44549 to 44-44553) did have the side scoop. In the image of 44-44553 under restoration, I believe you can see the pipe just forward of the side exhaust manifold that would connect to the scoop in the cowling.

All the P-75s used the V-3420-B engine that had a two-stage supercharger. Air for the engine was fed into the impeller of the first stage at the back of the engine. I think the air for the engine came in via the belly scoop, perhaps on the right side before the coolant radiator.
 

Attachments

  • XP-75 exhaust manifold air jacket.JPG
    XP-75 exhaust manifold air jacket.JPG
    104.1 KB · Views: 76
  • Fisher XP-75A 44-32162 rear.jpg
    Fisher XP-75A 44-32162 rear.jpg
    190.2 KB · Views: 66
  • XP-75 under construction exhaust manifold air jacket.JPG
    XP-75 under construction exhaust manifold air jacket.JPG
    93.6 KB · Views: 59
  • P-75A 44-44553 under restoration.JPG
    P-75A 44-44553 under restoration.JPG
    77.5 KB · Views: 69

blackkite

Don't laugh, don't cry, don't even curse, but.....
Joined
May 31, 2007
Messages
7,892
Reaction score
3,736
Oh I see!! Thank you very much for excellent and detailed information.
Without your information, perhaps I can't understand this system forever.:D
https://flic.kr/p/2bZauGN
 
Last edited:

Foo Fighter

I came, I saw, I drank some tea (and had a bun).
Senior Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2016
Messages
2,069
Reaction score
969
Just for the sake of asking, how would the P-75a have fared against the TA-152h series in the escort role?
 

blackkite

Don't laugh, don't cry, don't even curse, but.....
Joined
May 31, 2007
Messages
7,892
Reaction score
3,736
Just for the sake of asking, how would the P-75a have fared against the TA-152h series in the escort role?
Very hard question indeed.

"This V-3420-B was the type installed in the Fisher XP-75. About 15 ft (4.6 m) of shafting separated the engine from the gear reduction. Note the much larger supercharger compared to the image of the V-3420-A engine. The V-3420-B used a two-stage supercharger and no turbosupercharger. (Gary Brossett image via the Aircraft Engine Historical Society)"

I can see two stage supercharger.

 

Attachments

  • allison-v-3420-b-nmusaf-rear.jpg
    allison-v-3420-b-nmusaf-rear.jpg
    328.6 KB · Views: 65
Last edited:

blackkite

Don't laugh, don't cry, don't even curse, but.....
Joined
May 31, 2007
Messages
7,892
Reaction score
3,736
WJPearce-san said that
"All the P-75s used the V-3420-B engine that had a two-stage supercharger. Air for the engine was fed into the impeller of the first stage at the back of the engine.I think the air for the engine came in via the belly scoop, perhaps on the right side before the coolant radiator."

I think this is excellent opinion.
Ducting from ram air intake to supercharger is easy.
Sorry all of my opinions are perfectly mistake.:D

Attachments


https://flic.kr/p/9FvbTP
 

Attachments

  • V-3420-2.jpg
    V-3420-2.jpg
    303.5 KB · Views: 66
Last edited:

WJPearce

ACCESS: Confidential
Joined
Mar 22, 2008
Messages
63
Reaction score
30
Glad I could help, blackkite. There is a lot of missing information on the XP-75.

I think the Ta 152H would have outclassed the P-75A. The Ta 152H was faster, especially at altitude, and had a higher ceiling. I think the Ta 152 was designed specifically for high-altitude, while the P-75 was a long-range fighter. The Ta 152 was a much more conventional design, and no one seemed to like how the P-75 flew, noting it as unstable and sluggish.

A few other points on the engine installation that led me to believe the info I posted previously.

In the engine installation image, note that there is a fair amount of room above the engine that could accommodate an induction system. However, the upper exhaust manifolds are not installed, and they would take up some of that room. Also, space is limited toward the rear of the engine were the induction pipe connects the first (auxiliary) stage and second (engine) stage superchargers. I believe an intercooler was planned for this location, and that would have further limited the space.

The image of the engine behind the P-75 wing shows the upper exhaust manifolds attached. There is enough room between them for an induction pipe, but this pipe would have been surrounded by the hot exhaust. Also, the induction would have to connect to the circular cover at the back of the engine, which is the auxiliary supercharger. This would require a fair amount of room and two 90-degree bends. It makes more sense (to me) to bring in air from the belly scoop, but I have not seen any images that confirm this.

The engine image provides a good view of the inlet/impeller of the auxiliary supercharger. Air existed the first stage via the silver pipe above the engine. This is where an intercooler was to be incorporated. The air was then fed through an injection carburetor and into the second, engine supercharger. The engine supercharger was coupled to the engine’s right crankshaft, and you can see its round housing with the horizontal ribs. You can also see the main induction manifold leading from the engine supercharger to between the right engine Vee.

The placement of the supercharger favors the right belly scoop providing induction air. Also, the right scoop just had a coolant radiator, while the left scoop had a coolant radiator and an oil cooler. Lastly, the exhaust manifolds on the display engine are not the same as those installed on the P-75.

I realize some of it is speculation, but it is the best I have.
 

Attachments

  • XP-75 engine installation.jpg
    XP-75 engine installation.jpg
    167.8 KB · Views: 57
  • Fisher P-75A engine.jpg
    Fisher P-75A engine.jpg
    107.3 KB · Views: 56
  • Allison V-3420-B NMUSAF rear.jpg
    Allison V-3420-B NMUSAF rear.jpg
    337.3 KB · Views: 52

Similar threads

Top