Thanks for that Triton.

I have seen basic specs for this project over the years, but this is the first time I have seen an illustration.
 
The project ended in 1966 since Italian Government decided to use the money allocated for the Trieste to build a new nuclear 18.000 ship dubbed "Enrico Fermi".
In September 1970 even the Fermi project was stopped and the funds were exploited to allow Italy to join the MRCA Panavia Tornado programme.


As the result of the collaboration between CNEN [Comitato Nafcionale Energia Nucleare - Italian Committee for Nuclear Energy] and the Italian Navy, the "Enrico Fermi" a logistic support ship of 18,000 tons, was to be constructed, powered by an 80 MWt PWR. The end of 1969 coincided with the terminal phase of CNEN's second five-year plan. In the course of this second Five-Year Plan, important work was done in the field of reactors of ship propulsion, as a result of the activities of a Committee of Experts formed with the sponsorship of CNEN and composed of representatives of the various industrial sectors and government agencies concerned. An agreement between CNEN and the Italian Navy has then resulted in the overcoming of the last obstacles to the launching of a programme for the building of a Naval logistic support ship, powered by a pressurized-water reactor.

Italy had undertaken studies for the construction of its first nuclear ship (the Enrico Fermi) on the basis of a co-operation agreement between the CDEN (National Committee for Nuclear Energy) and the National Defense Ministry - Military Navy (Rome, 9th December 1966). This project concerned a "pilot ship" rather than a mercantile one, whose traveiling, once it is commissioned, might give rise to serious legal problems also connected with the ship's special characteristics.

The FIAT forwarded an offer for the nuclear power system and in 1970 it was considered that definition of the industrial agreement would be reached very soon. Over ninety percent of the nuclear plant components, including all the internal reactor parts, will be built by the national industry. CNEN would obviously have responsibility for the more strictly nuclear aspects of the project, including the critical experiment which will be completed in the next days at the CNEN Casaccia Center, while the Italian Navy will handle the building of the vessel.

The Enrico Fermi logistic support ship, was to have an 18,000 ton displacement, and the power plant, with an 80 MWt IWR, will have a 22,000 SHP power and a maximum speed of 20 knots. With the definition of industrial contracts, times may be speeded up and in 1970 it was considered that the ship will be at sea by 1972/3. The overall project cost was estimated at about 35 million dollars.

About 40 firms had full capability in manufacturing equipment for nuclear installations (both power stations and fuel - fabrication or reprocessing - facilities). Of them, six companies qualify as "general contractors" for the construction of complete plants, acting also as "chef de file" of consortia or groups with possible connections with international manufacturers. Three of these were public concerns: Snam Progetti of Sandonato Milanese, as company in the field for the ENI State Group, Ansaldo Meccanico Nucleare of Genao, as the leading company for the IRI-Finmeccanica State Group and Breda-Termomecanica & Locomotive of Milan as leading company for the EFIM State Group. The other three are private concerns: Montecatini Edison, which had concentrated the experience of Edison in the construction of the Trino Veroellese plant, the activities undertaken by the nuclear section of Montecatini and SNIA Viscoaa of Bombrinl Parodi-Delfino, the chemical company active in the construction for CNEN of the fuel plants EUREX and PCUT, and FIAT of Turin whose activities in the nuolear field include also the construction of the reactor for the Italian nuclear ship Enrico Fermi.

Methods had been formulated to treat the rod cluster control for present-generation pressurized water reactors within the computational codes available at Comitato Nazionale per l'Energia Nucleare (CNEN) for light water reactors. The reliability of these procedures had been verified by comparing the calculated results with the most significant experimental data available from measurements performed by the Centre d'Etude de l'Energie Nucleaire-Studiecentrum Voor Kernenergie (Belgian Plutonium Recycling Program), Babcock and Wilcox (Lumped Burnable Poison Program), Westinghouse, and CNEN (Italian Nuclear Ship Propulsion Program).

Italy was planning to rent two tons of enriched uranium from France for the reactor of its first nuclear ship, the Enrico Fermi. By 1971 this project was in abeyance.
1667231711965.png

1667231767836.png
1667231798231.png
 
It seems odd not to have no missiles at all, but I think this just predates Aspide.
May it be that they wanted this design to serve a prototype for nuclear helicopter cruiser?

Of course, all the other Italian helicopter cruisers had Terrier.

If I was building this ship as a combatant, I'd absolutely strip off the 5-inch guns, put Terrier up front, and add a third pair of 3-inch guns on the hangar. But my word it would be expensive!
 
it does say support logistic ship which makes the cannons even more questionable tbf

why not just a pair (if that) of 3" guns on the front bow and the rest is like...RAS kingposts? bruh moment
 
Looks like she have enough guns for a helicopter cruiser...

Enough guns for a task force.
They certainly weren't underestimating the Soviet Mediterranean Fleet, or over-relying on escorts being available when needed.

It seems odd not to have no missiles at all, but I think this just predates Aspide.
Part of the Italian design philosophy was a belief that, in wartime, the Mediterranean would be a complex air and sea environment, with threats being identified at relatively short range and from multiple directions simultaneously. Guns were thought to have quicker response times than missiles, and could more easily be arranged to cover multiple axes.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom