Embraer C-390 Millennium (ex-KC-390)

Triton

Donald McKelvy
Senior Member
Joined
14 August 2009
Messages
9,707
Reaction score
2,021
Website
deeptowild.blogspot.com

Attachments

  • C-390.jpg
    C-390.jpg
    130.8 KB · Views: 1,103
  • C-390_06.jpg
    C-390_06.jpg
    61.4 KB · Views: 1,139
Last year, the KC-390 changed from a conventional tail formation to a T-tail formation. Most of the pictures posted so far are from a couple of years ago when Embraer first revealed the KC-390 concept.
 
Embraer's original concept in 2007 was to develop a “quick and simple” derivative of the Embraer 190 large regional jet with a high wing as a military transport. Initially designated the C-390, it was expected to cost $600 million to develop, with $400 million to be provided by the government and $200 million by Embraer and risk-sharing partners. This is the design I was documenting in this topic.

The KC-390 unveiled in 2009 is an all-new design according to Embraer. Embraer has launched the KC-390 military tanker/transport with a seven-year, $1.3 billion development contract from the Brazilian air force (FAB). The all-new aircraft is scheduled to fly in 2012 and enter service in 2015.

If Embraer comes up with another design, or if the prototype or built configuration does not match the T-tail design concepts we have seen, they should be added to this topic.

Source: Warwick, Graham. "Embraer Launches KC-390 Tanker/Transport" at Aviaton Week
http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story_generic.jsp?channel=aerospacedaily&id=news/KC390041509.xml
 
Anybody know if Embraer is planning a AEW&C, Martitime Patrol or even possible may I dare say a Gunship variant of this aircraft? or can this aircraft even be modified for those purposes. please any and all feed back would be welcomed. And will it be a serious threat to the C-130J transport aircraft? And Why would France even be considering looking at this aircraft after it has so much invested in the A-400M "Grizzly". :)
 
silkmonkey said:
And Why would France even be considering looking at this aircraft after it has so much invested in the A-400M "Grizzly". :)

AFAIK French involvement is linked to the eventual sale of the Dassault "Rafale" to the Brazilian AF.
 
silkmonkey said:
Anybody know if Embraer is planning a AEW&C, Martitime Patrol or even possible may I dare say a Gunship variant of this aircraft? or can this aircraft even be modified for those purposes. please any and all feed back would be welcomed.

Every producer has the tendency to make as much versions as possible to attract the customer. But the product itself is not ready nor matured yet, so it is a bit premature question now. It can be modified for almost every task, presuming that somebody is going to pay a bill.

silkmonkey said:
And will it be a serious threat to the C-130J transport aircraft?

Not likely. Purchase of the military aircraft is always politics vs. performance matter, mostly in the favor of the first. Brazil hardly has the same lobby as the US has, no matter how good the KC-390 will be.

silkmonkey said:
And Why would France even be considering looking at this aircraft after it has so much invested in the A-400M "Grizzly". :)

Rafale as the return plus they are not the same category. The same question should be why the US is buying the C-17, C-130 and C-27J in the same time...
 

Attachments

  • 2-kc-390.jpg
    2-kc-390.jpg
    59.3 KB · Views: 148
  • AIR_KC-390_Refuels_AMX_Concept_lg.jpg
    AIR_KC-390_Refuels_AMX_Concept_lg.jpg
    93.7 KB · Views: 182
  • kc3902.jpg
    kc3902.jpg
    149.1 KB · Views: 230
  • kc390.jpg
    kc390.jpg
    84.9 KB · Views: 249
  • kc-390_2.jpg
    kc-390_2.jpg
    43.5 KB · Views: 227
I was reading this post on Ares

http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/defense/index.jsp?plckController=Blog&plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&newspaperUserId=27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7&plckPostId=Blog%3a27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7Post%3aa740522f-7aae-40d7-a7cd-a643073898a8&plckScript=blogScript&plckElementId=blogDest

about the inspection of the KC-390 mockup. The journalists saw what looked like a 'garage door-style' movable pressure bulkhead. I'm trying to figure out its purpose. One obvious reason would be to enable the depressurization of the aft compartment whilst keeping the front pressurized, but, operationally, why would that capability be worth the complication?
Also, do you know of other aircraft featuring internal movable pressure bulkheads?
 
I'd worry about the DC-10 effect, albeit in reverse...
 
you mean sudden (and unintentional) depressurization? yeah, that probably wouldn't be good...
 
I'm trying to figure out its purpose.

Possibly to allow pressurised section to carry troops in a combi type arrangement (i.e. troops in pressurised part/equipment in pressurised)? Not sure if it is cost effective, though it would allow flight at higher altitude without the need for pressurising the entire fuselage, which might help with fuel burn. Just speculating.

Regards,

Greg
 
I wonder what they'd do with the loadmaster. He'd probably have to stay in the unpressurized side of the fuselage. I think there are operations that cannot be performed sitting in front of monitors in the forward section.
 
Are you talking about the cargo mission or some other mission?
I guess all is possible, but for now I'm assuming that the functions performed by the loadmaster during a cargo resupply mission, or worse yet in an airdrop mission, are just too complex, or require too much actual physical activity to be replaced. Contrast this with the functions of the flight engineer, whose job was mostly to just monitor parameters, and was more easily replaced by sensors and software.
I'm also guessing there are sets of missions where the loadmaster may not be necessary, and would be replaced by mission specialists (refueling drogue operator, sensor operators, etc.).
 
Rather than be a pressure bulkhead it could be a partition for fire protection purposes (i.e. to reduce the volume to insert halon into in the event of a fire).
 
If it is, then they are paying a whole lot of weight penalty to carry it. I am still thinking that the more obvious reason is the right one. But the implementation of such a novel device must stem from some interesting CONOPS. I wonder what that is ???
 
Artist's impression of frozen design configuration of Embraer KC-390 circa 2011 and mockup.

Source:
http://www.aviationweek.com/Blogs.aspx?plckBlogId=Blog:27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7&plckController=Blog&plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&newspaperUserId=27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7&plckPostId=Blog%253A27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7Post%253Aa740522f-7aae-40d7-a7cd-a643073898a8&plc
http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/Embraer-Launches-KC-390-Tactical-Air-Transport-Program-05380/
http://www.mecanicodeaeronaves.com/noticias.html
 

Attachments

  • kc-390.jpg
    kc-390.jpg
    45.3 KB · Views: 228
  • k390int.jpg
    k390int.jpg
    224.4 KB · Views: 224
  • AIR_KC-390_Refuels_AMX_Concept_lg.jpg
    AIR_KC-390_Refuels_AMX_Concept_lg.jpg
    93.7 KB · Views: 114
  • 82d437f9-623b-4248-ac2d-c75047df87c2.Full.jpg
    82d437f9-623b-4248-ac2d-c75047df87c2.Full.jpg
    662.4 KB · Views: 99
  • fcd7c882-aef6-47bf-ab7e-cfe0bd4bf1bb.Full.jpg
    fcd7c882-aef6-47bf-ab7e-cfe0bd4bf1bb.Full.jpg
    51 KB · Views: 113
  • 6d4f52ee-46ad-4dd7-89f3-b388c496d289.Full.jpg
    6d4f52ee-46ad-4dd7-89f3-b388c496d289.Full.jpg
    383.5 KB · Views: 106
Model of Embraer KC-390.

Source:
http://combatace.com/gallery/image/22460-embraer-kc-390-model/
 

Attachments

  • gallery_24248_751_1170311.jpg
    gallery_24248_751_1170311.jpg
    1.2 MB · Views: 96
Artist's impression of Embraer KC-390.

Source:
http://www.aereo.jor.br/tag/forca-aerea-brasileira/
 

Attachments

  • kc-390_3.jpg
    kc-390_3.jpg
    109.9 KB · Views: 753
  • 1_KC-390_02.jpg
    1_KC-390_02.jpg
    135 KB · Views: 794
  • KC-390-ilustração-via-FAB.jpg
    KC-390-ilustração-via-FAB.jpg
    115 KB · Views: 851
KC-390 airframe work-sharing.

KC-390 parts suppliers.

Source:
http://difusiontecnologiaavanzada.blogspot.com/2012/07/kc-390-tankertransport-embraer-big.html
http://www.latinaero.com/news/civilian/2012_06/nws_civ_120627-001.html
 

Attachments

  • KC-390 1.jpg
    KC-390 1.jpg
    111.5 KB · Views: 763
  • nws_civ_120627_01-003.jpg
    nws_civ_120627_01-003.jpg
    309.3 KB · Views: 774
KC-390 wind tunnel model.

Source:
http://interdefensa.argentinaforo.net/t322p90-embraer-kc-390
 

Attachments

  • kc390model1.jpg
    kc390model1.jpg
    63.7 KB · Views: 116
  • kc390model2.jpg
    kc390model2.jpg
    57.5 KB · Views: 106
  • kc390model3.jpg
    kc390model3.jpg
    75 KB · Views: 124
This video clip from NLR and DNW shows the manufacturing and aerodynamic testing of the EMBRAER KC-390 CMS5 wind tunnel model. This model is an update of the EMBRAER KC-390 CMS4 model that was tested earlier. In the current test, the refueling system during flight is simulated as well as payload parachute testing. In addition, three dimensional velocity flow field investigations are performed with a Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) measurement technique.

http://youtu.be/m-YXCC_9hEg
 
Model of Embraer KC-390.

Source:
http://www.aereo.jor.br/2012/11/22/companhia-nacional-perde-espaco-no-kc-390/
 

Attachments

  • LAAD-2011-KC390-com-fundo-desfocado-foto-poder-aereo-poggio1.jpg
    LAAD-2011-KC390-com-fundo-desfocado-foto-poder-aereo-poggio1.jpg
    58.6 KB · Views: 99
Embraer KC-390 "Jupiter"?

Source:
http://www.aereo.jor.br/2011/05/07/a-repercussao-do-kc-390/
 

Attachments

  • C-390F_correios.jpg
    C-390F_correios.jpg
    77.4 KB · Views: 281
  • KC-390_ordenados.jpg
    KC-390_ordenados.jpg
    131.3 KB · Views: 308
  • Zeus_y_Jupiter_para.jpg
    Zeus_y_Jupiter_para.jpg
    130.9 KB · Views: 311
  • KC-390-e-Hercules.jpg
    KC-390-e-Hercules.jpg
    115.7 KB · Views: 303
  • EKC-390_Vs_KC-390.jpg
    EKC-390_Vs_KC-390.jpg
    96.3 KB · Views: 218
BAE Systems artist's impression of Embraer KC-390.

Source:
http://www.baesystems.com/image/BAES_027601/kc-390---image?_afrLoop=1388171423041000&_afrWindowMode=0&_afrWindowId=null&baeSessionId=QgHrQGqQj12HQhbTpdVvdsG3hsrRn0G2rjwbJYtM2tPTp21QWH2z!791695071
 

Attachments

  • BAES_027601_940x529.jpg
    BAES_027601_940x529.jpg
    121.2 KB · Views: 134
Have any of the C-/KC-390 versions depicted above been ordered at all, or is it all mere wishful thinking?
 
I'm pretty sure it is still in development with absolutely no orders...including from Brazil.
 
That's what I've found, too. A lot of "letters of intent" (from Brazil, Peru and Colombia) and
interest to evaluate the aircraft (Portugal and Sweden), but no firm orders.
 
Artist's impressions of Embraer KC-390 and expected performance.

Source:
http://www.embraerdefensesystems.com/english/content/cargo/performance.asp
http://www.embraerdefensesystems.com/english/content/cargo/overview.asp
 

Attachments

  • img_zoom_aircraft_overview.jpg
    img_zoom_aircraft_overview.jpg
    43.5 KB · Views: 95
  • img_zoom_aircraft_overview2.jpg
    img_zoom_aircraft_overview2.jpg
    58 KB · Views: 108
  • img_performance_cargavsalcance.jpg
    img_performance_cargavsalcance.jpg
    71.5 KB · Views: 142
  • img_performance_medidas_internas.jpg
    img_performance_medidas_internas.jpg
    23.5 KB · Views: 177
Published on May 21, 2013

The KC-390 is the largest airplane ever built by the Brazilian aeronautics industry and will set a new standard for medium-sized military transport aircraft in terms of performance and payload capacity. With its 23-ton capacity and a maximum cruising speed of 465 knots (860 km/h), the KC-390 will provide significant mobility gains for its operators and considerably reduce mission time.

http://youtu.be/N6OZTF-Q8Fo
 
AeroFranz said:
...
Also, do you know of other aircraft featuring internal movable pressure bulkheads?

It's a simple question with a simply answer: Il-76, An-70, An-178
 
so the tail cone is not pressurized, the seal being formed by this movable bulkhead?
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom