JohnR said:IMO aesthetically she resembles the Foch/Clemenceau rather than CdeG, the island being in the more central position.
What was the intended powerplant, from the number of exhausts I would guess Gas Turbines?
The Freench did sign up for a CTOL version of the Thales CVF design and were looking at a joint build effort with the UK, however with the change in government, the PA2 however was droped from the first 5 yr budget and the UK pressed ahead with ordering CVF.HeavyG said:I think all of these variants are going to fall by the wayside...I believe the French are cooperating with the British. The most likely design will be a variant of the new Queen Elizabeth class which the British just started building.
Lets hope so for everyones sake!HeavyG said:I think all of these variants are going to fall by the wayside...I believe the French are cooperating with the British. The most likely design will be a variant of the new Queen Elizabeth class which the British just started building.
I think they tried, suggesting the hull be built at Brest. But seeing as steel has been cut and advance preparations made in the UK it's moot. IMHO the most economical thing for the French would be to let the UK build the hull, then fit it out in France, much as they did with the Mistral. But somehow I do not think the French Unions would wear it.Pioneer said:Lets hope so for everyones sake!HeavyG said:I think all of these variants are going to fall by the wayside...I believe the French are cooperating with the British. The most likely design will be a variant of the new Queen Elizabeth class which the British just started building.
Although I find it hard to believe that the French would not want control and biggest say in such a large project! (Not being derogatory to the French - its just past history I am reflecting on when it comes to joint military projects - especially with Britian!!)
Because DCNS are pushing their revamped Julliet design, and this has just one Gas turbine along with diesels so the intakes and exhausts are all truncked together in to one island. The CVF design had two seperate engine rooms and thus the twin islands as opposed to one long one.westlife_100 said:one island again? why? ???
Only the 300m plus sized carriers have more than two lifts. The CdG, CVF and PA2 designs have always had two lifts (except for the BAE CVF proposal that had three small F-35 sized lifts but that design was rejected)zen said:Just two lifts too? Or did I miss one?
How so?H_K said:
- First, 3 shafts will be more efficient than 2 shafts (counter-intuitive, I know - the return-to-grace of 3-shaft arrangements seems to be driven by very recent advances in fluid dynamics).
Specs for the lastest PA2 design (source : DCNS) :H_K said:
The new PA2 design by DCNS unveiled at Euronaval 2010 is 85 MW, of which 64 MW for propulsion.H_K said:That said, I would have preferred to see a hybrid propulsion setup with two diesel-electric shafts for cruise and a gas turbine directly driving a centreline sprint-optimized variable pitch propeller, since I think that would be even cheaper and mechanically simpler. Something along these lines - ideal for a carrier or fast amphib set-up.
Smaller propellers are more efficient, and the centerline propeller is set-back from the two others and thus benefits from their rotational energy. Wartsila claims installed power savings of ~7% from adding a centreline shaft: www.wartsila.com/Wartsila/global/docs/en/ship_power/media_publications/technical_papers/coded_machinery.pdfgral_rj said:
Interesting, do you have a source for the 85MW installed power on the latest PA2 design? AFAIK, the Euronaval press release only gave the size of the 3 electric motors: 63 MW (19MW x2 + 25MW).Matt R. said:The new PA2 design by DCNS unveiled at Euronaval 2010 is 85 MW, of which 64 MW for propulsion.
The British CVF design is 108 MW, of which 80 MW for propulsion.
CDG is 61 MW for propulsion and another 21 MW for electric power.
According to the diagram above, installed power is 74 MW, of which 63 MW for propulsion. This won't be enough to generate the required 20+ MW required for electric power.
Source is this November 2010 article from Mer et Marine :H_K said:Interesting, do you have a source for the 85MW installed power on the latest PA2 design? AFAIK, the Euronaval press release only gave the size of the 3 electric motors: 63 MW (19MW x2 + 25MW).
"Le modèle présenté par DCNS et STX adopte une propulsion tout électrique, avec trois diesel-alternateurs, une turbine à gaz et trois moteurs électriques de propulsion. L'ensemble développe 85MW, dont 64 MW pour la seule propulsion, qui doit permettre au porte-avions de filer à 26 noeuds."
1) DCNS propulsionH_K said:I've updated my drawing to reflect DCNS' "big diesel" layout, as best as I can guess. It doesn't make sense to me, because the big diesels have less power density and less redundancy than smaller diesels. I've drawn two alternative propulsion configurations:
Continuous flight ops with 90m catapults requires nothing less than a USN-sized super carrier. A good third of PA2's bow catapult is on the wrong side of the foul deck line, so an extra 10 meters isn't going to be enough.Thorvic said:Whats the idea with the stern of the new DCNS PA2 design, why extend the rear deck but not the flight deck, surely if they extended the flight deck over this area the angled deck would start further back and avoid the issue of the fwd catapult fouling the sngled landing deck providing for continuous flight ops if required ?
For reference purposes :H_K said:AFAIK, the Euronaval press release only gave the size of the 3 electric motors: 63 MW (19MW x2 + 25MW).
PA2 Aircraft Carrier
DCNS has been working on definition studies for ‘PA2’, a second aircraft carrier for the French Navy, since 2003. The aim is to ensure the continuous availability at all times, to France and to Europe, of a key power projection capability, air/sea dominance and deep strike missions. From the time the PA2 project received the initial go-ahead in January 2005, DCNS and its partners launched a study to exploit the similarities between the British CVF (Carrier Vessel of the Future) programme and the French PA2 programme. This led DCNS to define a French version of the CVF, dubbed CVF-FR-V2i, to meet the PA2 requirement.
The need for a constantly operational carrier-based air wing was confirmed in the 2008 white paper on defence and national security. The French government has put off its final decision concerning this programme until 2012.
To maintain its skillset, DCNS continues to study, in liaison with the DGA, variants of the proposed carrier meeting the needs of the French Navy and international customers. These studies are conducted as part of the Group’s Championship improvement strategy to meet customer needs to the best of our ability and in compliance with strict budgetary guidelines.
The version presented at Euronaval 2010 has a displacement of 60.000 tonnes and is optimised for efficient flight deck operations (90-metre catapults, sizing of deck and hangar areas, munitions payload), high operational availability, low cost of ownership and compliance with Bureau Veritas Naval Rules for habitability and safety.
Carrier group centrepiece
The PA2's capabilities include air/sea control over a wide area, strike attacks against land and maritime targets along with missions as the centrepiece of a French carrier group or in cooperation with allied forces. On operational deployments with an air wing of 40 aircraft, the PA2 will be able to carry out up to 75 air missions per day for extended periods.
To increase the French Navy's force projection capabilities, every effort is being made to ensure that the PA2 offers high at-sea availability. In particular, DCNS proposes to apply lessons learned and the progress achieved in through-life support for French warships in recent years. Operational availability will be improved by ensuring that the ship is laid up less often and for shorter periods. Provision will also be made for easier access, handling and removal of heavy or cumbersome equipment.
The PA2 is being designed for reduced crewing, specifically a complement of just 900. The ship will also accommodate an air wing of 620, a command team of up to 100 and up to 100 other passengers or crew for special missions. Every effort is being made to improve living and working conditions. Accommodation and living areas will be separated from work areas.
Platform and propulsion system
The design is for an ‘all-electric’ ship with a powerplant comprising three diesel-alternator sets in the engine room with a gas turbine and backup diesel-alternator set under the island.
Propulsion will be provided by three shaftlines with fixed-pitch propellers.
The direct-drive electric propulsion motors will have power ratings of 2x19 MW for the port and starboard shaftlines and 25 MW for the centre shaftline.
The proposed design calls for two 90-m catapults and additional decks under the hangar deck to ensure more space for aircraft operations. The flight deck will be operational up to sea state 5/6. The air wing spaces will be both larger and more efficient. More specifically:
- fixed-wing aircraft will be launched at 300 km/h by two 90-m catapults
- flight deck launch rate will be one aircraft every 30 seconds, or a complete strike of 24 in about 12 minutes
- air wing and flight deck facilities will be fully interoperable with the latest aircraft types operated by leading navies.
The PA2 will be able to deploy an air group of 35 to 40 aircraft including some in the 15/25 tonne class:
- Rafale combat aircraft, in the F3 configuration, taken as the main sizing template, along with provision for three E-2C airborne early warning aircraft
- oblique runway inclined at 8°30’ to ship’s centreline
- midships island between the two lifts
- hangar with storage space for part of the air wing, but reserved primarily for aircraft maintenance
- additional storage areas for support equipment and optional items
- two starboard lifts, each with a useful payload of 36 tonnes, linking the hangar to the flight deck.
Combat system and weapons
The PA2 systems are designed to deploy and command an air wing and provide self-defence capabilities consistent with the defensive capabilities of the carrier’s air wing and the carrier group as a whole.
The systems include the carrier’s combat system – with its surveillance sensors, EW suite, self-defence systems and CMS – an integrated bridge with its navigation system, a multi-service network and the communications system. The Setis® CMS is based on that developed for the FREMM multimission frigate programme.
Technical data (conventional propulsion option)
- Length overall (flight deck): 285 m
- Beam overall (flight deck): 69 m
- Displacement (end of life): 62,000 t
- Speed: 26 knots (> 20 knots on (n-1) shaftlines)
- Accommodation: 1,690
- Flight deck, area: 13,400 m2