C(X)-6 VSTOL/ STOL projects

boxkite

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2006
Messages
861
Reaction score
211
What was the CX-6 - a project number/designation, the abbreviation for a military cargo freighter competition or something else?

The illustration is from "Der Flieger" 2-3/1968, but I miss the details :( .
 

boxkite

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2006
Messages
861
Reaction score
211
As usual, I've forgotten to attach the drawing ... sorry.
 

Attachments

  • CX-6.gif
    CX-6.gif
    148.1 KB · Views: 1,468

lark

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2006
Messages
1,811
Reaction score
122
Maybe this could be usefull:

From:Aviation Week & Space Technology ,June 24,1968.page 74.

*North American.
With extensive lift-fan transport experience dating from
before the CX-6 V/STOL transport studies,North American has evolved a concept
that could serve as a commercial VTOL transport...
 

Jemiba

Moderator
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2006
Messages
8,349
Reaction score
1,552
The only CX-6 I could find, is this fan-in-wing model, built by
North American:
(from Aviation Week 10/65)
But it's just a model to test different wing/fan layouts, I think.
 

Attachments

  • NASA-CX-6A-1.JPG
    NASA-CX-6A-1.JPG
    37.8 KB · Views: 1,210
  • NASA-CX-6A-2.JPG
    NASA-CX-6A-2.JPG
    38.6 KB · Views: 1,166
  • NASA-CX-6A-3.JPG
    NASA-CX-6A-3.JPG
    26.6 KB · Views: 1,104

Jemiba

Moderator
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2006
Messages
8,349
Reaction score
1,552
Oops, pictures designated "Nasa" in the North American folder and the other way round ... ::)
Here's a model of a VSTOL transport with fan-in-pod design (from Aviation Week 1968 19-26) :
 

Attachments

  • NA-fan-in-pod-transport.JPG
    NA-fan-in-pod-transport.JPG
    37.5 KB · Views: 1,193

lark

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2006
Messages
1,811
Reaction score
122
Jemiba,

In the June 24 issue of 1968 there's only text...
 

Jemiba

Moderator
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2006
Messages
8,349
Reaction score
1,552
"In the June 24 issue of 1968 there's only text... "

Two years ago, I borrowed all issues of Avaition Week I could find in our largest
public library here and they came as very massive books. As I was in quite a hurry
to scan interesting pages, I gave the volume numbers as reference, which aren't
corresponding to the single issues, sorry. So, all I can say is, that these pictures
were shown in an issue between the 19th and 26th week of 1968 ...
 

overscan (PaulMM)

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 27, 2005
Messages
13,615
Reaction score
7,671
North American and Boeing studied 20,000lb payload VSTOL transport configurations for the C-6A program, and North American showed an early configuration at Paris (1965?).


Source:
Flying Review International, August 1965
 

Deino

Moderator
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2006
Messages
3,016
Reaction score
1,243
Hmmm interesting ... all I found so far about a C-6 is this small picture labled CX-6 !!
 

Attachments

  • CX-6.gif
    CX-6.gif
    148.1 KB · Views: 119

overscan (PaulMM)

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 27, 2005
Messages
13,615
Reaction score
7,671
Well- didn't take me long :)

Jemiba's NASA model

http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19670024125_1967024125.pdf
 

lark

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2006
Messages
1,811
Reaction score
122
and:
http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19940011245_1994011245.pdf
 

Jemiba

Moderator
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2006
Messages
8,349
Reaction score
1,552
A North American design for the USAF C-6A , 10t V/STOL transport.
Two engines with deflected thrust in wingroot pods

(from Aviation Week1965 18-26)
 

Attachments

  • NA_C-6A.JPG
    NA_C-6A.JPG
    39.4 KB · Views: 1,745

toura

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Apr 12, 2008
Messages
1,207
Reaction score
147
Hi all

A long time ago.....1963 ! in "aviation week and space techenologie"
I 've found this..it is an unbuild project from North American : the C 6 A.

DO YOU KNOW ???
 

Attachments

  • north.jpg
    north.jpg
    670.3 KB · Views: 846

Jemiba

Moderator
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2006
Messages
8,349
Reaction score
1,552
No problem ! Can you tell us, what the design on the lower
picture (with the four lift-fans) is ?
 

hesham

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
28,475
Reaction score
6,158
In the Bell papers which just display by Steve Pace ,the Bell D-2274 was
submitted to this tender,so may be it was this;
 

Attachments

  • CX-6.gif
    CX-6.gif
    148.1 KB · Views: 493

hesham

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
28,475
Reaction score
6,158
We can say,the competitors were;


Bell D-2274
Boeing or Boeing Vertol ---?
Lockheed CL-?
North American ----?
McDonnell M-?
Ryan ----?
 

hesham

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
28,475
Reaction score
6,158
pometablava said:
Could it be Lockheed CL-988?


My dear Pometablava,


do you have a more info or a drawing to it ?.
 

lark

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2006
Messages
1,811
Reaction score
122
What made you think , that the plane in reply#21 ,is a Bell design Hesham ?
 

hesham

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
28,475
Reaction score
6,158
OK my dear Pometablava,


I hope to know the McDonnell proposal.
 

lark

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2006
Messages
1,811
Reaction score
122
Yes , the Bell designation is mentioned indeed Hesham, but I
saw no relation the the drawing...

By the way , have you seen the customer for the
design on Steve's list.
 

hesham

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
28,475
Reaction score
6,158
OK my dear Lark,


we can say,also the General Dynamics/Convair submitted a proposal,but the
Bell responded about its support system study.
 

lark

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2006
Messages
1,811
Reaction score
122
To conclude for the moment , it seems that for only one contender (NAA) the illustrations
are for sure...
 

hesham

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
28,475
Reaction score
6,158
hesham said:
We can say,the competitors were;


Bell D-2274
Boeing or Boeing Vertol ---?
Lockheed CL-?
North American ----?
McDonnell M-?
Ryan ----?


My dear Lark,


also Boeing,Lockheed and McDonnell were confirmed by Flying Review magazine,to be enter this competition.
 
Last edited:

lark

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2006
Messages
1,811
Reaction score
122
I have the Flying Review magazine in my (paper) collection Hesham
but I was talking about the illustrations..
 

hesham

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
28,475
Reaction score
6,158
From; Flugwaffe und Fliegerabwehr 1967,


here is an artist drawing to CX-6 proposal,may be it was from Fairchild and
based on C-123 ?.
 

Attachments

  • CX-6.png
    CX-6.png
    350.5 KB · Views: 1,007

hesham

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
28,475
Reaction score
6,158
From Flyinf Review 3/1965,


here is a small info about CX-6 competition.
 

Attachments

  • CX-6  3-1965.png
    CX-6 3-1965.png
    95.8 KB · Views: 794

hesham

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
28,475
Reaction score
6,158
Hi,

here is un-cleared view to Boeing-Vertol CX-6 Proposal.

http://kulturserver-nds.de/home/hubtest/medien/Typenkartei3953xGUN7x9T3Z7.pdf
 

Attachments

  • 2.png
    2.png
    183.8 KB · Views: 651

overscan (PaulMM)

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 27, 2005
Messages
13,615
Reaction score
7,671
10-Ton-Payload USAF V/STOL Studied

Paris—Boeing Co. and North American Aviation are expected to receive Air Force approval soon for detailed design studies of powerplant configurations for a proposed C-6A 10-ton-payload V-STOL transport. If approved the aircraft would be a direct follow-on to the 4-ton-payload Ling-Temco-Vought XC-142 tilt-wing aircraft now under evaluation. Powerplants to be studied include vectored- thrust, direct-lift and fans.

Current C—6A studies being conducted by Boeing and North American under separate contracts of $330.000 each are designed primarily to determine penalties that must be paid in over-all performance, range and operating costs to gain capability of vertical flight as compared with aircraft designed solely for short takeoffs and landings.

Both firms are scheduled to present their findings this week to Air Force officials at the Pentagon.

The configuration of an early North American C-6A-type design was shown at the Paris Air Show here. It now has been superseded by later designs, including study of a compound vehicle using helicopter techniques for vertical lift and those of a conventional aircraft for range and endurance.

Air Force mission requirements laid down for both companies include a stipulation that the aircraft must have ferry range of at least 2,600 mi. The high-wing model shown by North American here was to have been powered by two high-bypass-ratio. vectored-thrust powerplants, housed in pods on either side of fuselage. Power would have been augmented by direct-lift engines located in root sections of the two pods. A tilt-wing design such as that employed on the XC-l42 is not being considered for the C-6A because of additional strains that would be involved in lifting relatively heavy loads and carrying them over long distances.

Primarily, the aircraft probably would be employed to carry cargo over medium ranges in support of combat troops in the field, although there are some proponents
in the Air Force who would employ it as vehicle to make deliveries from the continental U. S. or other major supply area directly to a battle zone. Current studies by the two contractors also include investigation of safety factors, the minimum time required for the aircraft to remain in an approach stage where it would be particularly susceptible to enemy ground fire and use considerable fuel and new techniques that might be required for identifying landing zones so that pilots could recognize them in various kinds of terrain.

An official of one of the two companies says initial assessments indicate there are no significant penalties for vertical as opposed to short-takeoff flight in an aircraft such as the C-6A if pilots can be trained to make minimum approach and hover. “If he needs 2,000 ft. to make an approach, then there's no need to have a vertical capability' he added. “Then vou might just as well stick with STOL"

Aviation Week & Space Technology, June 21, 1965
 

Attachments

  • NAA-C-6A.png
    NAA-C-6A.png
    324.2 KB · Views: 549

CJGibson

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
May 26, 2011
Messages
1,584
Reaction score
1,048
Looks like they nicked that design from Bristol Siddeley.

Chris
 

hesham

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
28,475
Reaction score
6,158
The Ryan CX-6A Proposal;

http://archive.aviationweek.com/image/spread/19650809/28/2
 

Attachments

  • CX-6A.png
    CX-6A.png
    125.9 KB · Views: 405

Similar threads

Top