• Hi Guest! Forum rules have been updated. All users please read here.

Boeing YAL-1 Airborne Laser Testbed

flateric

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
8,781
Reaction score
205
With a Rosdivan's hint here goes autopsy of YAL-1A.
Note that all these go from the open source....
 

Attachments

Kadija_Man

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
1,920
Reaction score
25
Why is the "target ranger" angled downwards? I'd have thought it would be aligned with the main laser.
 

flateric

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
8,781
Reaction score
205
rickshaw said:
Why is the "target ranger" angled downwards? I'd have thought it would be aligned with the main laser.
The key word is 'boost phase intercept' - YAL-1A purpose is to intercept missiles just after launch. Where you'd expect to see these while trying to do this while flying stright and level?
 

Kadija_Man

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
1,920
Reaction score
25
So, why isn't the laser therefore then aligned with the "target ranger"?
 

Triton

Donald McKelvy
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
9,723
Reaction score
186
Website
deeptowild.blogspot.com
Boeing promotional video for the Boeing YAL-1 Airborne Laser Testbed (formerly Airborne Laser).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v5SDo0rH1Xo


Future Weapons television series segment on Airborne Laser Testbed.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0LKk1bTL6fk


Cut-away illustration of Boeing YAL-1 Airborne Laser Testbed.

Source: http://www.airborne-laser.com/airborne_laser_photo_album/


Another cut-away illustration of Boeing YAL-1 Airborne Laser Testbed.

Source: http://www.jimonlight.com/2009/03/30/the-yal-1-might-get-scrapped/


Cut-away model of Boeing YAL-1 Airborne Laser Testbed.

Source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/robot-vs-monkey/1394147293/

Photograph of Boeing YAL-1 Airborne Laser Testbed.

Source: http://www.boeing-747.com/special_boeing_747s/
 

Attachments

Trident

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
May 8, 2006
Messages
821
Reaction score
18
rickshaw said:
So, why isn't the laser therefore then aligned with the "target ranger"?
Both systems are trainable AFAIK, so where their bore sight axis is pointed makes little difference. My guess is that the ranging system pod points down a bit because Boeing found this was preferable for some obscure aerodynamic reason.
 

Firebee

CLEARANCE: Confidential
Joined
Apr 1, 2011
Messages
100
Reaction score
1
There is also this book (circa 1997) about the development of the ABL.

By Robert W. Duffner
Published by Basic Books (USA)
ISBN: 9780306456220
 

coanda

CLEARANCE: Confidential
Joined
Feb 3, 2009
Messages
74
Reaction score
6
Trident said:
rickshaw said:
So, why isn't the laser therefore then aligned with the "target ranger"?
Both systems are trainable AFAIK, so where their bore sight axis is pointed makes little difference. My guess is that the ranging system pod points down a bit because Boeing found this was preferable for some obscure aerodynamic reason.
It's been positioned for minimum drag during cruise. So it's likely that the aircraft cruises with a slight nose up attitude, and the ranging laser pod is arranged to present minimum frontal area during that flight phase.
 

Triton

Donald McKelvy
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
9,723
Reaction score
186
Website
deeptowild.blogspot.com
Boeing promotional video for the YAL-1 Airborne Laser Testbed, a modified 747-400 that was developed to shoot down ballistic missiles during the first few minutes of flight.
 

sferrin

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2011
Messages
11,940
Reaction score
279
Cancelled ages ago.
 

Jos Heyman

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Joined
Feb 15, 2007
Messages
597
Reaction score
2
The only aircraft built, 00-0001, was sent to AMARC on 12 February 2012. The second one, 00-0002, was never built.
 

Stargazer2006

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2009
Messages
13,243
Reaction score
85
Do we have confirmation that the quoted YFC-36A was the initial designation of the YAL-1A, or was this just an educated guess?
 

Andreas Parsch

CLEARANCE: Secret
Joined
Mar 2, 2006
Messages
243
Reaction score
1
Stargazer2006 said:
Do we have confirmation that the quoted YFC-36A was the initial designation of the YAL-1A, or was this just an educated guess?
Educated guess.

The only confirmed information for the YFC-36A designator is the timeframe of the MDS reservation (early 1996), and that the plane was to have 4 engines. If you are looking for a project in 1996 for a 4-engined transport modified to a "prototype interceptor" (the official definition of the "F" modified mission prefix says "Aircraft modified to intercept and destroy other aircraft or missiles"), the ABL is a more or less perfect match. But I admit it's still only an educated guess :-\ .
 

circle-5

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
May 31, 2009
Messages
1,161
Reaction score
46
Excellent article by Northrop Grumman's own Tony Chong, here.
 
Top