• Hi Guest! Forum rules have been updated. All users please read here.

Boeing Transonic Truss Braced Wing Concept

RavenOne

CLEARANCE: Secret
Joined
Jun 18, 2008
Messages
279
Reaction score
291
These ultra-thin folding wings measure more than half the length of a football field! Our new Transonic Truss-Braced Wing concept is revealed at #aiaaSciTech today. #TheFutureIsBuiltHere Read more: http://bit.ly/2VAnHks
 

Attachments

sublight is back

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2012
Messages
770
Reaction score
53
They already fly at mach .80- so now they'll do it more efficiently at a higher altitude? I wonder if that will make the Q corner a lot more hairy.....
 

Moose

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2010
Messages
1,251
Reaction score
236
Along with returning to the more market-friendly .80 mach, visually this is a lot less clunky looking which may help people buy-in. Interesting timing on this release too, wonder if they're closer to a real TTB product than previously indicated.
 

Sundog

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2006
Messages
2,805
Reaction score
247
sienar said:
Everything old is new again.
That was mentioned in the article at AW&ST.
 

litzj

BLOG : http://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/
Joined
Feb 4, 2012
Messages
257
Reaction score
35
Website
jaesan-aero.blogspot.com
structural and L/D characteristics could be advantage

but aerodynamic stability can be issue.

still it is not as radical as box wing type
 

Avimimus

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Joined
Dec 16, 2007
Messages
1,962
Reaction score
76
Isn't the goal a better L/D ratio, the truss as a way to increase rigidity to allow that, and the technological advance to push the braced wing concept to higher speeds than previous proposals?
 

malipa

TU Delft AE student
Joined
Jun 14, 2012
Messages
190
Reaction score
1
The aerodynamic stability isn't actually more of an issue with this concept. It is really not that more different than a more standard design, when looking at the planform, and thus the aerodynamic stability is comparable. The problem is the aerodynamic interaction between the truss and the wing, possibly creating structural instability (created by buffeting for instance when at trans-sonic speed). And they want to have very long slim wings to dramatically increase the aspect ratio, decreasing the lift dependent drag component.
 

malipa

TU Delft AE student
Joined
Jun 14, 2012
Messages
190
Reaction score
1
The difference in offset between the truss and the main wing is rather small and both act pretty near the aerodynamic center and center of mass of the aircraft. That is not the case with the box wing structure, where the surfaces lay quite a part further away from the center of mass and aerodynamic center of the aircraft.
 

litzj

BLOG : http://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/
Joined
Feb 4, 2012
Messages
257
Reaction score
35
Website
jaesan-aero.blogspot.com

Attachments

sferrin

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2011
Messages
13,270
Reaction score
1,295
Avimimus said:
Isn't the goal a better L/D ratio, the truss as a way to increase rigidity to allow that, and the technological advance to push the braced wing concept to higher speeds than previous proposals?
Isn't that basically what a diamond wing does? Why a truss over a diamond wing? Is one better than the other?
 

Attachments

litzj

BLOG : http://jaesan-aero.blogspot.com/
Joined
Feb 4, 2012
Messages
257
Reaction score
35
Website
jaesan-aero.blogspot.com
sferrin said:
Avimimus said:
Isn't the goal a better L/D ratio, the truss as a way to increase rigidity to allow that, and the technological advance to push the braced wing concept to higher speeds than previous proposals?
Isn't that basically what a diamond wing does? Why a truss over a diamond wing? Is one better than the other?
compared to pure diamond wing, it has less aerodynamic center change via flight condition change

and it can prevent downstream interference by positioning brace part under the main wing

for diamond wing, dowmstream part should be at the downstream of the front wing, and cannot be at the under side because of landing gear interference
 

bobbymike

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Joined
Apr 21, 2009
Messages
10,084
Reaction score
1,146

TomcatViP

Hellcat
Joined
Feb 12, 2017
Messages
2,008
Reaction score
701
And by the way

 

Grey Havoc

The path not taken.
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2009
Messages
11,717
Reaction score
1,839
I'll just mention the current thread title in this post so people won't get too confused if and when the title changes.
Boeing Transonic Truss Braced Wing Concept
 
Top